Literature DB >> 21458209

Completion imaging after carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Study Group of New England.

Jessica B Wallaert1, Philip P Goodney, John J Vignati, David H Stone, Brian W Nolan, Daniel J Bertges, Daniel B Walsh, Jack L Cronenwett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We studied surgeons' practice patterns in the use of completion imaging (duplex or arteriography), and their association with 30-day stroke/death and 1-year restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
METHODS: Using a retrospective analysis of 6115 CEAs, we categorized surgeons based on use of completion imaging as rarely (<5% of CEAs), selective (5% to 90%), or routine (≥90%). Crude and risk-adjusted 30-day stroke/death and 1-year restenosis rates were examined across surgeon practice patterns. Finally, we audited 90 operative reports of patients who underwent re-exploration and characterized findings and interventions. We analyzed the effect of re-exploration on outcomes.
RESULTS: Practice patterns in completion imaging varied: 51% of surgeons performed completion imaging rarely, 22% selectively, and 27% routinely. Crude 30-day stroke/death rates were highest among surgeons who routinely used completion imaging (rarely: 1.7%; selectively: 1.2%, routinely: 2.4%; P = .05). However, after adjusting for patient characteristics predictive of stroke/death, the effect of surgeon practice pattern was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] for routine-use surgeons, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.93-2.17; P = .10; selective-use surgeons, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.40-1.41; P = .366). Stenosis >70% at 1 year showed a trend toward lowest rates for surgeons who performed completion imaging (rarely: 2.8%, selectively: 1.1%, and routinely: 1.1%; P = .09). This effect became statistically significant for selective-use surgeons after adjustment (hazard risk [HR] for selective-use surgeons, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.92; P = .02). Overall, 178 patients (2.9%) underwent operative re-exploration. Routine-use surgeons were most likely to perform re-exploration (7.6% routine, 0.8% selective, 0.9% rare; P < .001). An audit of 90 re-explored patients demonstrated technical problems, the most common being flap, debris, and plaque. Rates of stroke/death were higher among patients who underwent re-exploration (3.9% vs 1.7%; P = .03); however, this affect was attenuated after adjustment (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.9-5.0; P = .08).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of completion imaging during CEA varies widely across our region. There is little evidence that surgeons who use completion imaging have lower rates of 30-day stroke/death, although selective use of completion imaging is associated with a small but a significant reduction in stenosis 1 year after surgery. We also demonstrate an association between re-exploration and higher risk of 30-day stroke/death, although this effect was attenuated after adjustment for patient-level predictors of stroke/death. Future work is needed to direct the selective use of completion imaging to prevent stroke, rather than cause unnecessary re-exploration. Published by Mosby, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21458209      PMCID: PMC3237118          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  31 in total

Review 1.  Intraoperative imaging: does it really improve perioperative outcomes of carotid endarterectomy?

Authors:  Caron B Rockman; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  Semin Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Methodologic challenges to studying patient safety and comparative effectiveness.

Authors:  Brian L Strom
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Intraoperative duplex scanning for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  O K Steinmetz; K MacKenzie; P Nault; F Singher; J Dumaine
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  Completion angiography, is it really necessary?

Authors:  J J Ricotta; M S O'Brien-Irr
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Intraoperative assessment of technical perfection in carotid endarterectomy: a prospective analysis of 1305 completion procedures. Collaborators of the EVEREST study group. Eversion versus standard carotid endartectomy.

Authors:  S Zannetti; P Cao; P De Rango; G Giordano; G Parlani; M Lenti; A Nora
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.069

6.  Intraoperative duplex scanning reduces both residual stenosis and postoperative morbidity of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  J R Dykes; T M Bergamini; D A Lipski; R L Fulton; R N Garrison
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Use of intraoperative duplex ultrasonography and routine patch angioplasty in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  M H Seelig; W A Oldenburg; A Chowla; E J Atkinson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Relationship between intraoperative color-flow duplex findings and early restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: a preliminary report.

Authors:  G Papanicolaou; C Toms; A E Yellin; F A Weaver
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  A regional registry for quality assurance and improvement: the Vascular Study Group of Northern New England (VSGNNE).

Authors:  Jack L Cronenwett; Donald S Likosky; Margaret T Russell; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Andrew C Stanley; Brian W Nolan
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Intraoperative duplex ultrasonography in carotid endarterectomy: the impact on indication for immediate revision and intermediate-term outcome.

Authors:  C Ott; G Heller; M Odermatt; M Furrer
Journal:  Vasa       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.961

View more
  6 in total

1.  Asymptomatic dissecting intimal lesions of common carotid arteries after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Hrvoje Budincevic; Ante Ivkosic; Miran Martinac; Tomislav Trajbar; Ivan Bielen; Laszlo Csiba
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Association of Quality Improvement Registry Participation With Appropriate Follow-up After Vascular Procedures.

Authors:  Benjamin S. Brooke; Adam W. Beck; Larry W. Kraiss; Andrew W. Hoel; Andrea M. Austin; Amir A. Ghaffarian; Jack L. Cronenwett; Philip P. Goodney
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Clinical relevance of cranial nerve injury following carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  M Fokkema; G J de Borst; B W Nolan; J Indes; D B Buck; R C Lo; F L Moll; M L Schermerhorn
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 7.069

4.  Carotid Endarterectomy in the Southern California Vascular Outcomes Improvement Collaborative.

Authors:  Kaelan Chan; Ahmed Abouzamzam; Karen Woo
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 1.466

5.  Intraoperative completion studies in carotid endarterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Christoph Knappich; Thomas Lang; Pavlos Tsantilas; Sofie Schmid; Michael Kallmayer; Bernhard Haller; Hans-Henning Eckstein
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

6.  [Intraoperative angiography in carotid artery reconstruction-Pathological findings, reliability and importance of the procedure].

Authors:  Jasmin Dillner; Frank Meyer; Zuhir Halloul; Michael Görtler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 0.955

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.