Literature DB >> 17909371

Methodologic challenges to studying patient safety and comparative effectiveness.

Brian L Strom1.   

Abstract

Studies of patient safety and comparative effectiveness entail unique methodologic challenges. These studies may be susceptible to systematic error, including selection bias, exposure misclassification, and outcome misclassification. They may also be vulnerable to random error, or confounding by a variable such as another drug, a disease, or the drug indication itself. Finally, special logistical issues can arise, including data access problems, difficulties in conveying the need for studies of certain interventions, and obstacles to gaining institutional review board approval. This article provides a conceptual overview of these methodologic issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17909371     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318041f752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  15 in total

1.  The body of evidence for advanced technology in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Stephen M Hahn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Orphan therapies: making best use of postmarket data.

Authors:  Judith C Maro; Jeffrey S Brown; Gerald J Dal Pan; Lingling Li
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  The relationship between benzodiazepine use and traffic accidents: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Beitske E Smink; Antoine C G Egberts; Klaas J Lusthof; Donald R A Uges; Johan J de Gier
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Completion imaging after carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Study Group of New England.

Authors:  Jessica B Wallaert; Philip P Goodney; John J Vignati; David H Stone; Brian W Nolan; Daniel J Bertges; Daniel B Walsh; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  The missing link in preconceptional care: the role of comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Hamisu M Salihu; Abraham Salinas; Mulubrhan Mogos
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

6.  Preliminary competencies for comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Jodi B Segal; Wishwa Kapoor; Timothy Carey; Pamela H Mitchell; Michael D Murray; Kenneth G Saag; Glen Schumock; Daniel Jonas; Michael Steinman; Rosemarie Filart; Morris Weinberger; Harry Selker
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.689

7.  Testing bias in clinical databases: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Karin J Velthove; Hubert Gm Leufkens; Patrick C Souverein; René C Schweizer; Wouter W van Solinge
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05-14

8.  Is aspirin useful in patients on lithium? A pharmacoepidemiological study related to bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Pieter Stolk; Patrick C Souverein; Ingeborg Wilting; Hubert G M Leufkens; Donald F Klein; Stanley I Rapoport; Eibert R Heerdink
Journal:  Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 4.006

9.  Prophylactic antiepileptic drug use is associated with poor outcome following ICH.

Authors:  Steven R Messé; Lauren H Sansing; Brett L Cucchiara; Susan T Herman; Patrick D Lyden; Scott E Kasner
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 10.  The policy debate over public investment in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Eugene C Rich
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.