Literature DB >> 21457855

Is there an optimal force level for sutural expansion?

Sean Shih-Yao Liu1, Lynne A Opperman, Hee-Moon Kyung, Peter H Buschang.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to establish the causal relationships between expansion force magnitudes, sutural separation, and sutural bone formation.
METHODS: Thirty-seven 6-week-old rabbits were randomly assigned to 4 force groups (0, 50, 100, or 200 g). Constant forces were delivered for 42 days by nickel-titanium open-coil springs to miniscrew implants (MSIs) placed in the frontal bone on both sides of the midsagittal suture. Inter-MSI and bone marker widths were measured biweekly to quantify sutural separation and MSI movements. Sutural bone formation was quantified based on the incorporation of fluorescent bone labels administered at days 18, 28, and 38.
RESULTS: Nine of 74 MSIs failed between days 0 and 14, including 4 in the controls and 5 in the 50-g group. A decelerating curvilinear pattern of sutural separation was evident in the 50-g, 100-g, 200-g groups. Bone markers showed that sutural widths increased by 0.6, 3.2, 5.1, and 6.2 mm in the control, 50-g, 100-g, and 200-g groups, respectively. Except for the 200-g group, significantly greater amounts of bone formation were observed between days 18 and 28 than between days 28 and 38. Sutural bone formation also increased with increasing forces up to 100 g; there was no difference between the 100-g and the 200-g groups. Sutural separation explained 71% and 53% of the variations in bone formation between days 18 and 28 and days 28 and 38, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of this study, sutural bone formation is directly related to the amount of sutural separation, which is in turn related to the amount of force applied. The results suggest that there is a level of induced sutural separation that provides the greatest amount of bone formation.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21457855     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of BALP, CTX-I, and IL-4 levels around miniscrew implants during orthodontic tooth movement between two different amounts of force.

Authors:  Mine Gecgelen Cesur; V Ozgen Ozturk; Beral Afacan; F Burcu Sirin; Afra Alkan; Torun Ozer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  The Combination of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy and Photobiomodulation Therapy for the Treatment of Palatal Ulcers: A Case Report.

Authors:  Rafael Maya; Lorena Lúcia Costa Ladeira; Juliana Elaine Pinto Maya; Letícia Machado Gonçalves Mail; Sandra Kalil Bussadori; Marco Aurélio Benini Paschoal
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-15

Review 3.  Suture Cells in a Mechanical Stretching Niche: Critical Contributors to Trans-sutural Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Wei Liang; Enzhe Zhao; Guan Li; Hongsen Bi; Zhenmin Zhao
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Effects of screw and host factors on insertion torque and pullout strength.

Authors:  Ankit H Shah; Rolf G Behrents; Ki Beom Kim; Hee-Moon Kyung; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Stretch force guides finger-like pattern of bone formation in suture.

Authors:  Bo-Hai Wu; Xiao-Xing Kou; Ci Zhang; Yi-Mei Zhang; Zhen Cui; Xue-Dong Wang; Yan Liu; Da-Wei Liu; Yan-Heng Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Stability of immediately loaded 3 mm long miniscrew implants: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Danielle Geshay; Phillip Campbell; Larry Tadlock; Emet Schneiderman; Hee-Moon Kyung; Peter Buschang
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2021-03-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.