Literature DB >> 21456088

Classification NanoSAR development for cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles.

Rong Liu1, Robert Rallo, Saji George, Zhaoxia Ji, Sumitra Nair, André E Nel, Yoram Cohen.   

Abstract

A classification-based cytotoxicity nanostructure-activity relationship (nanoSAR) is presented based on a set of nine metal oxide nanoparticles to which transformed bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B) were exposed over a range of concentrations (0.375-200 mg L(-1) ) and exposure times up to 24 h. The nanoSAR is developed using cytotoxicity data from a high-throughput screening assay that was processed to identify and label toxic (in terms of the propidium iodide uptake of BEAS-2B cells) versus nontoxic events relative to an unexposed control cell population. Starting with a set of fourteen intuitive but fundamental physicochemical nanoSAR input parameters, a number of models were identified which had a classification accuracy above 95%. The best-performing model had a 100% classification accuracy in both internal and external validations. This model is based on three descriptors: atomization energy of the metal oxide, period of the nanoparticle metal, and nanoparticle primary size, in addition to nanoparticle volume fraction (in solution). Notwithstanding the success of the present modeling approach with a relatively small nanoparticle library, it is important to recognize that a significantly larger data set would be needed in order to expand the applicability domain and increase the confidence and reliability of data-driven nanoSARs.
Copyright © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21456088      PMCID: PMC3970551          DOI: 10.1002/smll.201002366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Small        ISSN: 1613-6810            Impact factor:   13.281


  35 in total

1.  Novel variable selection quantitative structure--property relationship approach based on the k-nearest-neighbor principle

Authors: 
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2000-01

Review 2.  Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: role of physicochemical interactions.

Authors:  Adamo R Petosa; Deb P Jaisi; Ivan R Quevedo; Menachem Elimelech; Nathalie Tufenkji
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Correlating physico-chemical with toxicological properties of nanoparticles: the present and the future.

Authors:  Pilar Rivera Gil; Günter Oberdörster; Alison Elder; Víctor Puntes; Wolfgang J Parak
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 4.  Nanotechnology and human health: risks and benefits.

Authors:  Anna Giulia Cattaneo; Rosalba Gornati; Enrico Sabbioni; Maurizio Chiriva-Internati; Everardo Cobos; Marjorie R Jenkins; Giovanni Bernardini
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.446

5.  Accurate quantitative structure-property relationship model to predict the solubility of C60 in various solvents based on a novel approach using a least-squares support vector machine.

Authors:  Huanxiang Liu; Xiaojun Yao; Ruisheng Zhang; Mancang Liu; Zhide Hu; Botao Fan
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-11-03       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 6.  Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel.

Authors:  Andre Nel; Tian Xia; Lutz Mädler; Ning Li
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Statistical methods for analysis of high-throughput RNA interference screens.

Authors:  Amanda Birmingham; Laura M Selfors; Thorsten Forster; David Wrobel; Caleb J Kennedy; Emma Shanks; Javier Santoyo-Lopez; Dara J Dunican; Aideen Long; Dermot Kelleher; Queta Smith; Roderick L Beijersbergen; Peter Ghazal; Caroline E Shamu
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticle aggregate size on gene expression.

Authors:  Junko Okuda-Shimazaki; Saiko Takaku; Koki Kanehira; Shunji Sonezaki; Akiyohshi Taniguchi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Copper oxide nanoparticles are highly toxic: a comparison between metal oxide nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes.

Authors:  Hanna L Karlsson; Pontus Cronholm; Johanna Gustafsson; Lennart Möller
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory responses induced by silica nanoparticles in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Park; Kwangsik Park
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.372

View more
  37 in total

Review 1.  QSAR without borders.

Authors:  Eugene N Muratov; Jürgen Bajorath; Robert P Sheridan; Igor V Tetko; Dmitry Filimonov; Vladimir Poroikov; Tudor I Oprea; Igor I Baskin; Alexandre Varnek; Adrian Roitberg; Olexandr Isayev; Stefano Curtarolo; Denis Fourches; Yoram Cohen; Alan Aspuru-Guzik; David A Winkler; Dimitris Agrafiotis; Artem Cherkasov; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Relating Nanoparticle Properties to Biological Outcomes in Exposure Escalation Experiments.

Authors:  T Patel; D Telesca; C Low-Kam; Zx Ji; Hy Zhang; T Xia; J I Zinc; A E Nel
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Physicochemical signatures of nanoparticle-dependent complement activation.

Authors:  Dennis G Thomas; Satish Chikkagoudar; Alejandro Heredia-Langer; Mark F Tardiff; Zhixiang Xu; Dennis E Hourcade; Christine T N Pham; Gregory M Lanza; Kilian Q Weinberger; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Comput Sci Discov       Date:  2014-03-21

4.  Optimal nano-descriptors as translators of eclectic data into prediction of the cell membrane damage by means of nano metal-oxides.

Authors:  Alla P Toropova; Andrey A Toropov; Emilio Benfenati; Rafi Korenstein; Danuta Leszczynska; Jerzy Leszczynski
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  Toward a systematic exploration of nano-bio interactions.

Authors:  Xue Bai; Fang Liu; Yin Liu; Cong Li; Shenqing Wang; Hongyu Zhou; Wenyi Wang; Hao Zhu; David A Winkler; Bing Yan
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 4.219

6.  Predicting Nano-Bio Interactions by Integrating Nanoparticle Libraries and Quantitative Nanostructure Activity Relationship Modeling.

Authors:  Wenyi Wang; Alexander Sedykh; Hainan Sun; Linlin Zhao; Daniel P Russo; Hongyu Zhou; Bing Yan; Hao Zhu
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  How should the completeness and quality of curated nanomaterial data be evaluated?

Authors:  Richard L Marchese Robinson; Iseult Lynch; Willie Peijnenburg; John Rumble; Fred Klaessig; Clarissa Marquardt; Hubert Rauscher; Tomasz Puzyn; Ronit Purian; Christoffer Åberg; Sandra Karcher; Hanne Vriens; Peter Hoet; Mark D Hoover; Christine Ogilvie Hendren; Stacey L Harper
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 7.790

8.  NanoEHS beyond Toxicity - Focusing on Biocorona.

Authors:  Sijie Lin; Monika Mortimer; Ran Chen; Aleksandr Kakinen; Jim E Riviere; Thomas P Davis; Feng Ding; Pu Chun Ke
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  A quantitative framework to group nanoscale and microscale particles by hazard potency to derive occupational exposure limits: Proof of concept evaluation.

Authors:  Nathan M Drew; Eileen D Kuempel; Ying Pei; Feng Yang
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 10.  Implementation of alternative test strategies for the safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  A E Nel
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.