| Literature DB >> 21455763 |
Dorota Formanowicz1, Piotr Formanowicz.
Abstract
Transferrin (Tf) is a glycoprotein responsible for iron transport in the human body. Physiologically in reaction with Concanavalin A, Tf occurs in four distinct variants Tf1, Tf2, Tf3 (apo-Tf) and Tf4. It was reported recently that Tf is changing, particularly during acute phase response, taking place among others in end-stage renal disease. In this study, we wanted to find the answer to three main questions: firstly, how Tf is changing in patients treated with maintenance haemodialysis (mHD), secondly, whether there are any Tf changes in the course of mHD treatment, and thirdly, what factors can affect Tf microheterogeneity in these patients. Studies were performed on 80 haemodialysed patients and 21 healthy volunteers. The Tf concentration was determined by the rocket immunoelectrophoresis, and its microheterogeneity was assessed by the ConA crossed immunoaffinity electrophoresis. During the annual observation of the distribution of the Tf variants, we have found both changes of the percentage contents of all Tf variants in the whole Tf concentration and a significant decrease in Tf2, Tf3 and Tf4 serum concentrations. Moreover, we found that decrease in the renal function, duration of mHD, and inflammation may contribute to these above-mentioned changes, which are probably the factors that should be taken into account when explaining the mechanisms of persistence of anaemia in haemodialysed patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21455763 PMCID: PMC3358588 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-011-9947-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Urol Nephrol ISSN: 0301-1623 Impact factor: 2.370
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the transferrin molecule. (a) Tetra-sialo-Tf while in (b) penta-sialo-Tf are shown
General characteristics of the studied groups
| Studied groups | mHD | HV as controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| mHD1 | mHD2 | ||
| Number of studied subjects (men/women) | 50/30 | 13/8 | |
| Age (years) | 55.6 ± 14 | 56.6 ± 14 | 54.8 ± 16 |
| eGFR (kg/min/1.73 m2) | 5.5 ± 6.9 | 4.31 ± 2.9 | 115.6 ± 31.9 |
| Diagnosis (number of subjects) | Glomerulonephritis (40) | — | |
| Diabetic nephropathy (31) | |||
| Hypertensive nephrosclerosis (9) | |||
| Number of subjects with cardiovascular disease | 64 | — | |
| Number of subjects supplemented with rHuEPO | 70 | 74 | — |
| Weekly doses of rHuEPO [IU] (mean dose among patients getting rHuEPO) | 4039 ± 2592 | 4260 ± 2847 | — |
| Number of subjects supplemented with iron | 65 | 69 | — |
| Weekly doses of iron [mg] (mean dose among patients getting iron) | 41.05 ± 63.758 | 106 ± 84.297 | — |
| Time of ESRD before enrolling to HD (months) | 19 ± 2 | — | |
| Time of HD treatment (months) | 46 ± 6 | 58 ± 6 | — |
Subjects were divided into patients treated with maintenance haemodialysis (mHD1—at the beginning of the study, mHD2—after 1 year of the study) and healthy volunteers (HV) as controls
Results were given as mean ± SD
eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, rHuEPO recombinant human erythropoietin, ESRD end-stage renal disease, HD haemodialysis
Anthropometrical parameters, liver metabolism parameters and inflammatory markers in mHD group (mHD1—at the beginning of the study, mHD2—after 1 year of the study) and in healthy volunteers (HV) as controls
| Parameter | mHD |
| HV as controls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mHD1 | mHD2 | |||
| WHR | 0.95 ± 0.22 | 0.94 ± 0.12 | 0.86 | 0.97 ± 0.05 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.16 ± 4.69 | 24.56 ± 4.75 | 0.07 | 25.6 ± 4.3 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dl) | 178.9 ± 47.4 | 173 ± 36.6 | 0.49 | 170.8 ± 24.3 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 179 ± 22.6** | 175.7 ± 23.2** | 0.54 | 92.3 ± 26.5 |
| Albumin (g/l) | 38.091 ± 5.34** | 36.73 ± 4.12** | 0.19 | 44.7 ± 1.71 |
| Bilirubin (mg/dl) | 0.6 ± 0.22 | 0.6 ± 0.13 | 0.91 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| ALT (IU/l) | 15.34 ± 7.8 | 15.38 ± 6.2 | 0.83 | 15.57 ± 7.4 |
| AST (IU/l) | 16.39 ± 5.7 | 16.44 ± 7.42 | 0.87 | 16.57 ± 6.31 |
| hsCRP (mg/l) | 7.42 ± 3.56** | 13.29 ± 12.03*** | 0.00018 | 2.3 ± 0.6 |
| IL-1 (pg/ml) | 3.98 ± 0.67*** | 8.41 ± 1.88*** | 0.00000 | 0.6 ± 0.01 |
| IL-6 (pg/ml) | 36.82 ± 39.84*** | 48.01 ± 109.72*** | 0.5 | 4.3 ± 0.7 |
| TNF-alpha (pg/ml) | 28.74 ± 70.7*** | 25.57 ± 21.10*** | 0.79 | 1.2 ± 0.1 |
The differences between mHD1 and mHD2 were estimated by paired t test. To compare mHD1 and mHD2 with HV as controls, unpaired the Student’s t test for normally distributed variables and the Mann–Whitney rank sum test for the variables with non-normal distribution were used
Data were given are means ± SD
WHR waist-to-hip ratio, BMI body mass index calculated as follows: BMI = weight (kg)/[height (m)]2, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, hsCRP high sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL-1 interleukin 1, IL-6 interleukin 6, TNF-alpha tumour necrosis factor-alpha
Significant differences when P < 0.05
** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001 versus HV
Selected haematological parameters used for characteristics of the studied groups
| Parameter | mHD |
| HV as controls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mHD1 | mHD2 | |||
| RBC (1012/l) | 3.25 ± 0.47*** | 3.11 ± 0.42*** | 0.03 | 4.6 ± 0.8 |
| HCT (%) | 33.3 ± 318*** | 32.31 ± 3.9*** | 0.64 | 44.3 ± 7.2 |
| HGB (g/dl) | 10.62 ± 1.54*** | 10.5 ± 1.21*** | 0.76 | 14.9 ± 2.0 |
| MCH (pg) | 32.86 ± 4.79 | 34.16 ± 3.7 | 0.15 | 34.2 ± 3.7 |
| MCV (fL) | 98.68 ± 5.86*** | 98.91 ± 5.72*** | 0.81 | 104.6 ± 11.1 |
| TIBC (μmol/l) | 37.66 ± 5.27*** | 42.4.8 ± 8.47*** | 0.0001 | 59.6 ± 5.3 |
| UIBC (μmol/l) | 21.92 ± 8.04*** | 17.942 ± 8.2*** | 0.0021 | 36.4 ± 3.1 |
| Fe (μmol/l) | 15.73 ± 6.68*** | 15.06 ± 7.86*** | 0.63 | 22.7 ± 9.1 |
| sFn (ng/ml) | 1749.55 ± 179.98*** | 1804.72 ± 1086.53*** | 0.88 | 188.2 ± 10.6 |
| TSAT (%) | 42.6 ± 18.95*** | 37.84.8 ± 24.7*** | 0.21 | 38.4 ± 6.5 |
Subjects were divided into patients treated with maintenance haemodialysis (mHD1—at the beginning of the study, mHD2—after 1 year of the study) and healthy volunteers (HV) as controls
The differences between mHD1 and mHD2 were estimated by paired t test. To compare mHD1 and mHD2 with HV as controls, unpaired the Student’s t test for normally distributed variables and the Mann–Whitney rank sum test for the variables with non-normal distribution were used
Data were given are means ± SD
mHD1 patients treated with maintenance haemodialysis at the beginning of the study, mHD2 patients treated with maintenance haemodialysis after 1 year of the study, RBC red blood cells, HCT haematocrit, HGB haemoglobin, MCH mean haemoglobin concentration, MCV mean corpuscular volume, TIBC total iron-binding capacity, UIBC unsaturated iron-binding capacity, Fe serum iron, sFn serum ferritin, TSAT transferrin saturation
Significant differences when P < 0.05
*** P < 0.001 versus HV
Fig. 2The Tf patterns analysed by the rocket immunoelectrophoresis according to Laurell. (I–II) Standard solutions (controls); (1–6) sera samples from selected patients from mHD1group, (6–12) sera samples from selected patients from mHD2 group
The serum concentrations of total Tf were estimated by the rocket immunoelectrophoresis according to Laurell. After the obtainment of the precipitates, the results were counted on the basis on the planimetrical analysis of the surfaces of these precipitates
| Parameter (mg/l) | mHD |
| HV as controls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| mHD1 | mHD2 | |||
| Tf | 1408.27 ± 410.98*** | 1386.486 ± 426.726*** | 0.82 | 3532.123 ± 761.31 |
| Tf1 | 132.035 ± 63.17* | 152.34 ± 62.97 | 0.19 | 150.12 ± 51.1 |
| Tf2 | 227.412 ± 76.56*** | 324.513 ± 124.59 | 0.0002 | 332.11 ± 121.1 |
| Tf3 | 942.957 ± 321.25*** | 802.21 ± 401.31*** | 0.021 | 2882.91 ± 721.3 |
| Tf4 | 150.865 ± 60.70 | 97.21 ± 44.46*** | 0.00024 | 150.871 ± 91.23 |
Subjects were divided into patients treated with maintenance haemodialysis (mHD1—at the beginning of the study, mHD2—after 1 year of the study) and in healthy volunteers (HV) as controls
The differences between mHD1 and mHD2 were estimated by paired t test. To compare mHD1 and mHD2 with HV as controls, unpaired Student’s t test for normally distributed variables and the Mann–Whitney rank sum test for the variables with non-normal distribution were used
Tf—serum transferrin, Tf1–Tf4—Tf variants
Data were given are means ± SD
Significant differences when P < 0.05
* P < 0.05; *** P < 0.001 versus HV
Fig. 3Tf microheterogeneity patterns of serum of selected healthy volunteer analysed by the crossed affinoimmunoelectrophoresis according to Bog-Hansen in the presence of Concanavalin A in the first-dimension gel (the horizontal pointer) and rabbit anti-human transferrin in the second-dimension gel (the perpendicular pointer)
Fig. 4Tf microheterogeneity patterns of sera of selected patients treated with maintenance haemodialysis analysed by the crossed affinoimmunoelectrophoresis according to Bog-Hansen in the presence of Concanavalin A in the first-dimension gel (the horizontal pointer) and rabbit anti-human transferrin in the second-dimension gel (the perpendicular pointer)
Fig. 5Per cent distribution of Tf variants in the whole transferrin serum concentration in studied groups. Subjects were divided into patients treated with maintenance haemodialysis (mHD patients) and healthy volunteers (HV). In the mHD group, there are two subgroups: mHD1 (patients at the beginning of the study) and mHD2 (the same group of patients after 12 months of the study)
Statistically significant correlations found in haemodialysed patients
| Tf3 | ||
|---|---|---|
| mHD1 | mHD2 | |
| Duration of HD treatment |
|
|
| eGFR |
|
|
| RBC |
|
|
| HGB |
|
|
| Fe |
|
|
| hsCRP |
|
|
| IL-6 |
|
|
mHD1—patients at the beginning of study and mHD2—patients after 1 year of the study
To calculate the correlations—Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used
Tf3 variant of transferrin, HD haemodialysis, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, RBC red blood cells, HGB haemoglobin, Fe serum iron, hsCRP high sensitivity C-reactive protein, IL-6 interleukin 6
Significant correlation when P < 0.05