Literature DB >> 21455701

Six years after: complications and long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy with different devices.

Volker Kahlke1, Jens Uwe Bock, Hans Günter Peleikis, Johannes Jongen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) was introduced in 1998. Early in the experience, a standard circular stapler was often used, while later specifically designed staplers for SH were developed. Although the diameter of the circular cutting knife differ significantly, it remains unclear, if the volume of the excised tissue differs and if this has an influence on the long-term results and complications.
METHODS: We evaluated in a prospective consecutive database that underwent SH from January 2003 through April 2004. There were three devices used during the study period: end-to-end-anastomosis (EEA) 31, stapler device for haemorrhoids (SDH) and procedure for prolapse and haemorrhoids (PPH). Procedure selection was at the discretion of the surgeon; however, the indications for surgery were similar for all involved surgeons. Demographic and operative characteristics were analysed. Follow-up data were collected continuously over the time, and in May 2010, these patients received a questionnaire. Data were compared by t test and chi-square test, respectively.
RESULTS: There were 214 (97 females) evaluable patients. Seventy-three patients were operated with EEA-31, 52 with SDH- and 89 with PPH. The median follow-up was 6.8 years and complete data were available for 131 (61.2%) patients. Demographic characteristics were comparable within the three groups. SDH (6 ml) and PPH (6.5 ml) resected significantly (p < 0.05) more tissue than EEA (5 ml). Early postoperative incontinence rate was significantly higher in the PPH group (6%) as compared to EEA (1%) and SDH (0%). The incidence of other early complications was similar across techniques. The overall complication rates and reoperation rates were similar. Although 41% of the patients had minor anorectal complaints (itching and soiling), incontinence rates were low (2-3%) without any significant differences between the devices.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of cohort of SH patients support the conclusion that short- and long-term outcomes are device independent, although each approach is associated with a modest degree of ongoing anorectal symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21455701     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-011-0787-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  31 in total

1.  [The Longo and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. A prospective comparative study of 300 patients].

Authors:  J J Kirsch; G Staude; A Herold
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Who assesses the quality of systematic reviews?

Authors:  Johannes Jongen; Volker Kahlke; Sven Petersen
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles.

Authors:  G Basdanis; V N Papadopoulos; A Michalopoulos; S Apostolidis; N Harlaftis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials.

Authors:  Ping Lan; Xjiaojian Wu; Xuyu Zhou; Jianping Wang; Longjuan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Meta-analysis results need to be evaluated with caution.

Authors:  Sven Petersen; Johannes Jongen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Complications and reoperations in stapled anopexy: learning by doing.

Authors:  Johannes Jongen; Jens-Uwe Bock; Hans-Günter Peleikis; Anne Eberstein; Karin Pfister
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-11       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; N J Mortensen; P O Nystrom; M A Kamm; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  A prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy: perioperative and one-year results.

Authors:  A J Senagore; M Singer; H Abcarian; J Fleshman; M Corman; S Wexner; S Nivatvongs
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Randomized comparison between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids in Taiwan: a prospective study.

Authors:  Wen-Shih Huang; Chih-Chien Chin; Chong-Hung Yeh; Paul Y Lin; Jeng-Yi Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 10.  Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures.

Authors:  M Pescatori; G Gagliardi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  3 in total

1.  A comparison of surgical devices for grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease. Results from the LigaLongo Trial comparing transanal Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy and circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Aurelien Venara; Juliette Podevin; Philippe Godeberge; Yann Redon; Marie-Line Barussaud; Igor Sielezneff; Michel Queralto; Cecile Bourbao; Anne Chiffoleau; Paul A Lehur
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdinando D'Amico; Steven D Wexner; Carolynne J Vaizey; Célia Gouynou; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.623

3.  Effects of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy on Anorectal Function: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Seyed Vahid Hosseini; Mehdi Tahamtan; Hajar Khazraei; Alimohammad Bananzadeh; Fahimeh Hajihosseini; Seyedeh Saeedeh Shahidinia
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2018-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.