Literature DB >> 20165702

Who assesses the quality of systematic reviews?

Johannes Jongen, Volker Kahlke, Sven Petersen.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20165702      PMCID： PMC2822960          DOI： 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0057a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN： 1866-0452            Impact factor:   5.594


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials.

Authors:  Ping Lan; Xjiaojian Wu; Xuyu Zhou; Jianping Wang; Longjuan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapled haemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  W-J Shao; G-C H Li; Z H-K Zhang; B-L Yang; G-D Sun; Y-Q Chen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 3.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Laughlan; D G Jayne; D Jackson; F Rupprecht; G Ribaric
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses: part 6 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.

Authors:  Meike Ressing; Maria Blettner; Stefanie J Klug
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 5.594
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Six years after: complications and long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy with different devices.

Authors:  Volker Kahlke; Jens Uwe Bock; Hans Günter Peleikis; Johannes Jongen
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.445
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.