Eukaryotic sodium channels are important membrane proteins involved in ion permeation, homeostasis, and electrical signaling. They are long, multidomain proteins that do not express well in heterologous systems, and hence, structure/function and biochemical studies on purified sodium channel proteins have been limited. Bacteria produce smaller, homologous tetrameric single domain channels specific for the conductance of sodium ions. They consist of N-terminal voltage sensor and C-terminal pore subdomains. We designed a functional pore-only channel consisting of the final two transmembrane helices, the intervening P-region, and the C-terminal extramembranous region of the sodium channel from the marine bacterium Silicibacter pomeroyi. This sodium "pore" channel forms a tetrameric, folded structure that is capable of supporting sodium flux in phospholipid vesicles. The pore-only channel is more thermally stable than its full-length counterpart, suggesting that the voltage sensor subdomain may destabilize the full-length channel. The pore subdomains can assemble, fold, and function independently from the voltage sensor and exhibit similar ligand-blocking characteristics as the intact channel. The availability of this simple pore-only construct should enable high-level expression for the testing of potential new ligands and enhance our understanding of the structural features that govern sodium selectivity and permeability.
Eukaryotic sodium channels are important membrane proteins involved in ion permeation, homeostasis, and electrical signaling. They are long, multidomain proteins that do not express well in heterologous systems, and hence, structure/function and biochemical studies on purified sodium channel proteins have been limited. Bacteria produce smaller, homologous tetrameric single domain channels specific for the conductance of sodium ions. They consist of N-terminal voltage sensor and C-terminal pore subdomains. We designed a functional pore-only channel consisting of the final two transmembrane helices, the intervening P-region, and the C-terminal extramembranous region of the sodium channel from the marine bacteriumSilicibacter pomeroyi. This sodium "pore" channel forms a tetrameric, folded structure that is capable of supporting sodium flux in phospholipid vesicles. The pore-only channel is more thermally stable than its full-length counterpart, suggesting that the voltage sensor subdomain may destabilize the full-length channel. The pore subdomains can assemble, fold, and function independently from the voltage sensor and exhibit similar ligand-blocking characteristics as the intact channel. The availability of this simple pore-only construct should enable high-level expression for the testing of potential new ligands and enhance our understanding of the structural features that govern sodium selectivity and permeability.
Voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) are membrane proteins responsible for rapid electrical
signaling in eukaryotic organisms ranging from humans to electric eels to flies. In
humans, VGSCs are current pharmaceutical targets for the treatment of pain (1), epilepsy (2), cardiovascular disease (3),
and prostate (4) and breast (5) cancer. In prokaryotic organisms, VGSCs play
vital roles in chemotaxis and homeostasis (6,
7). Our understanding of their mode of
action, sodium selectivity, permeability, and the dynamics of how they achieve the
different, distinct conformations that bind ligands is limited by the current lack
of detailed structural information for this family of proteins.Eukaryotic VGSCs are large (>200 kDa) monomeric heavily glycosylated membrane
proteins composed of four pseudo-repeated domains, each of which contains six
transmembrane segments that consist of a four-transmembrane (helices
S1–S4) N-terminal
voltage sensor subdomain and a two-transmembrane (helices S5 and S6) C-terminal pore
subdomain. Although they can be expressed in mammalian cells at the low levels
necessary for electrophysiological studies, as of yet, there have been no reports of
high-level expression in any systems in the quantities necessary for biophysical or
structural characterization.Bacterial VGSCs are simpler, being composed of shorter polypeptides, each consisting
of a single six-transmembrane domain, that assemble as tetramers to form active
channels. Since the identification of the first of these bacterial channels, NaChBac
from Bacillus halodurans (8),
a large related subfamily of bacterial sodium channels has been identified with high
sequence similarities (7, 9–11). Electrophysiology
studies following recombinant expression in mammalian cells have shown that the
VGSCs NavBP from Bacillus pseudofirmus,
NavSheP from Shewanella putrefaciens, NavBacL
from Bacillus licheniformis, NavRosD from
Roseobacter denitrificans, Navsp from
Silicibacter pomeroyi, and Navpz from
Paracoccus zeaxanthinifaciens, as well as NaChBac, are highly
selective for Na+ ions, bind calcium channel-blocking drugs, and
exhibit activation, inactivation, and recovery similar to those of humansodium
channels, albeit at ∼10–100× slower rates (8, 9,
11). Bacterial VGSCs have
∼20–25% identity with human VGSCs, but more importantly, have
nearly identical hydrophobicity profiles and predicted topologies as each of the
pseudo-repeated eukaryotic domains; therefore they are expected to have similar
overall structures. High-level bacterial expression, purification, and
characterization of NaChBac and a thermally stabilized mutant of this channel have
been described (12, 13).VGSCs are members of the same family as voltage-gated potassium channels, for which
there are a number of crystal structures available (14–16). In those channels, the two subdomains appear to be
spatially independent. Recent studies using disulfide cross-linking to trap regions
of proximity (17) suggest that NaChBac forms
a similar three-dimensional arrangement to the voltage-gated potassium channels. The
pore subdomains form a compact central transmembrane pathway capable of
accommodating ions in both selectivity and cavity regions; this is surrounded by the
relatively loosely associated voltage sensor subdomains. Isolation and expression of
the N-terminal four-transmembrane voltage sensor subdomain of the NaChBac channel
(17) showed that the voltage sensor alone
was capable of folding in the absence of the pore subdomain, and EPR measurements
confirmed that it has a more tightly packed but similar overall fold to that of
potassium voltage sensors (18). Here we
designed a pore-only version of the Navsp bacterial sodium channel and
investigated whether it formed folded, stable tetramers and was capable of
supporting Na+-specific ion channel permeability in the absence of
the voltage sensor.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials
The prokaryotic homologue gene isolated from S. pomeroyi
was supplied by Prof. David E. Clapham (Howard Hughes Medical Institute,
Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) (9). Quick ligase, restriction
enzymes, and DH5α chemically competent cells were purchased from
New England Biolabs. Syntheses of PCR primers and all DNA sequencing
were performed by Eurofins MWG Operon. Ni-NTA and all DNA purification
supplies were purchased from Qiagen, Inc. Thrombin and the pET15b vector
were purchased from Novagen, Inc. (EMD Chemicals, Darmstadt, Germany).
Decyl maltoside detergent (DM) was obtained from Anatrace, Inc., and
lipids were from Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc. Unless otherwise noted,
chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich.
Cloning Expression Constructs
The pore-only construct (see Fig. 1,
gray residues), composed of the C-terminal region
beginning at transmembrane helix 5, was designed based on multiple
sequence alignment (ClustalW (19)) across the family of prokaryotic voltage-gated sodium
channels and with the MlotiK, Kv1.2-Kv2.1 chimera, and KcsA potassium
channel crystal structures (PDB codes 3beh, 2r9r and 1bl8, respectively) (14, 16, 20). Dictionary of Protein
Secondary Structure (DSSP) (21)
analyses of the crystal structures via the 2Struc server (22) were use to define the ends of
the helical regions. The full-length construct (Navsp) and
the pore-only construct (sp-pore) were PCR-amplified to incorporate an
N-terminal NdeI site and a C-terminal BamHI site using the following
primers: Navsp forward primer,
5′-GGAGAAATTACATATGGGACAAAGAATG-3′, and reverse primer,
5′-CCCTGAAAATACGGATCCTACTTTTTGGT-3′; sp-pore forward
primer, 5′-TGCGCTGCCCCATATGGCCAGCGTG-3′, and reverse
primer, 5′-GTTAGCAGCCGGATCCTACTTTTTGG-3′. These
restriction sites enabled simple restriction digest and ligation into
the pET15b vector. Both constructs were transformed into C41(DE3) cells
for expression.
FIGURE 1.
Primary structure of full-length Na
Expression and Purification
5 μl of LB medium (containing 50 μg/ml ampicillin) was
inoculated from a single colony and grown for 8 h at 37 °C. 100
μl of LB medium containing ampicillin (50 μg/ml) was
inoculated with 100 μl of culture and grown overnight at 30
°C. The overnight culture was used to inoculate 6 liters of LB
medium containing ampicillin (50 μg/ml). Cultures were grown at
37 °C until an A600 of 0.6, at which
time isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside was added to a
final concentration of 500 μm. Cultures were harvested 4
h after induction via centrifugation at 6,000 ×
g at 4 °C. All cell pellets were stored at
−80 °C.Cell pellets were suspended in TBS (20 mm Tris, pH 7.5, 150
mm NaCl) buffer supplemented with 0.2 mm of the
protease inhibitor phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (VWR International)
and 2 μg/ml DNase I and 2.5 mm MgSO4 and
lysed by cell disruption using an Avestin EmulsiFlex-C5. The lysate was
centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 30 min to pellet unlysed cells and
insoluble cellular debris. The supernatant was centrifuged at 43,000
× g for 1 h to pellet membranes. The membranes
were resuspended in TBS with 50 mm decyl maltoside and
incubated at 4 °C for 4 h.Approximately 1.5 ml of Ni-NTA slurry was equilibrated with TBS buffer
and added to the solubilized membranes from a 6-liter culture.
Histidine-tagged proteins were allowed to bind overnight at 4 °C.
Solubilized membranes containing Ni-NTA resin were spun down at 2,000
× g for 5 min, and buffer was poured off. The
resin was resuspended three times in TBS, 0.2% DM, 300
mm NaCl, containing progressively 25, 30, and 35
mm imidazole, for 0.5 h each to wash away non-specifically
bound proteins. Four consecutive elutions, at 4 ml each, were performed
in TBS with 0.2% DM and 300 mm imidazole. Elutants were
checked for purity on SDS-PAGE and combined. These were then filtered
using a 0.22-μm filter and concentrated using an Amicon
ultrafiltration device (50-kDa molecular mass cutoff for sp-pore and 100
kDa for Navsp, respectively) prior to thrombin cleavage.
During concentration, imidazole was removed via buffer exchange.
Thrombin cleavage took place at room temperature overnight at 20 units/4
mg of protein. The cleaved protein, cleaved His tag, and remaining
His-tagged protein were incubated with Ni-NTA, and the flow-through was
collected.
Gel Filtration Chromatography
The Ni-NTA flow-through was filtered through a 0.22-μm filter and
then concentrated in preparation for loading onto a gel filtration
column. Gel filtration (Superdex 200 10/300 GL, GE Healthcare) was used
to isolate the predicted tetrameric channel. Protein was eluted with 10
mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mm NaCl, 0.02%
NaN3, and 0.2% DM at a rate of 0.5 ml/min.
Circular Dichroism (CD) Spectroscopy
Synchrotron radiation circular dichroism (SRCD) spectra were collected on
the CD1 beamline at the Institute for Storage Ring Facilities in Aarhus
(ISA) Synchrotron, Aarhus, Denmark. For all CD measurements, the protein
concentrations were determined immediately prior to measurement. The
beamline was calibrated with camphorsulfonic acid at the beginning of
the data collection. The extinction coefficient at 280 nm was calculated
from the amino acid sequence using the ExPASy ProtParam website (23), and the concentration was
determined from the A280 measured on a
Nanodrop 1000 UV spectrophotometer.Navsp (5.7 mg/ml) or sp-pore (5 mg/ml) in the gel filtration
buffer was loaded into a 0.009-mm path length quartz Suprasil
demountable cell (Hellma UK Ltd.), and three spectra were collected at
25 °C over the wavelength range from 280 to 170 nm, with a 1-nm
step size and a 2-s dwell time. The replicates were averaged, and the
averaged baselines (consisting of the buffer, including detergent but no
protein) were subtracted from the averaged sample spectra. Data
processing was carried out with the CDtool software (24), using mean residue weights of
112.3 and 113.9 for Navsp and sp-pore, respectively. Data
were analyzed with the DichroWeb analysis server (25); the reported values were the averaged results
using three different algorithms (CONTINLL (26, 27),
SELCON3 (28), and CDDSTR (28)) and the SP175t reference
dataset (29). The goodness-of-fit
parameters for both samples were <0.08, indicating reliable
analyses.Thermal melts were undertaken using an Aviv 62ds spectropolarimeter with
a detector acceptance angle of >90° (for membrane/scattering
samples). Two thermal denaturation experiments were performed for each
protein sample using a 0.1-mm path length Suprasil cuvette. Measurements
were made on samples at >1 mg/ml at the wavelength 222 nm using set
temperature interval steps of 5 °C between 15 and 100 °C.
The actual sample temperature (as opposed to the set temperature) was
determined using a thermistor probe inserted in the sample cell. An
equilibration time of 3 min was used at each temperature point. Melting
curves were produced using a two-parameter Boltzmann sigmoidal fit
function in SciDAVis (Scientific Data Analysis and Visualization).
22Na+ Uptake Assay
1-Palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-3-phosphatidylethanolamine and liver
l-α-phosphatidylinositol were solubilized in buffer A
(450 mm NaCl, 10 mm HEPES, 4 mm NMG, pH 7.5)
with 35 mm CHAPS at 10 mg/ml, mixed in a 3:1 ratio, and
incubated at room temperature for 2 h. Polystyrene columns (Pierce) were
packed with Sephadex G-50 beads, presoaked overnight in buffer A, and
spun on a Beckman TJ6 centrifuge until reaching 3,000 rpm. 20 μg
of Navsp or 30 μg of sp-pore protein was added to 100
μl of lipid (1 mg) and incubated for 30 min. Liposomes were
formed by adding the protein/lipid sample to the partially dehydrated
columns and spinning to 2,500 rpm. The extra-liposomal solution was
exchanged by spinning the sample to 2,500 rpm in partially dehydrated
columns, now containing beads soaked in buffer B (400 mm
sorbitol, 10 mm HEPES, 4 mm NMG, pH 7.5).
22Na+ uptake was initiated by adding
400 μl of buffer B containing 22Na+
and the indicated concentration of mibefradil. The addition of
mibefradil to buffer B at concentrations greater than 500
μm rapidly induced a thick precipitate even before
being added to the proteoliposomes and thus could not screened. At
various time points, aliquots of the liposome uptake reaction were
flowed through 0.5-ml Dowex cation exchange columns charged with NMG in
protonated form to remove extra-liposomal
22Na+. These aliquots were then mixed
with scintillation fluid and counted in a liquid scintillation counter.
Fractional flux at 60 min in the presence of mibefradil was determined
following data subtraction from uptake counts measured at each time
point from protein-free liposomes.
RESULTS
Construct Design and Protein Expression and Purification
Sequence alignments were used to predict the locations of the six
transmembrane segments of the Navsp channel (Fig. 1). Numerous key residues, such
as the voltage-sensing charges on S4 and the residues involved with ion
selectivity, were used to confirm the sequence alignment. The minimal
pore construct designed (Fig. 1,
gray residues) included only S5, the S5-S6 P-linker
with the proposed selectivity filter, S6, and the C-terminal domain that
is predicted to form a coiled-coil domain when the four subunits
associate (10).Primary structure of full-length NaBoth Navsp and sp-pore were readily expressed (at similar
levels) in Escherichia coli, and roughly comparable
yields of the solubilized purified proteins were produced. The purified
Navsp and sp-pore proteins migrate in SDS denaturing gels
near their predicted monomeric molecular masses (∼29 and 15 kDa,
respectively) (Fig.
2A). The slightly higher value than
predicted for Navsp (∼25 kDa) is commonly seen for
membrane proteins that have reduced SDS solvation (30). Western blot analyses suggest that the small
higher molecular weight band for Navsp is likely to be a
dimer.
FIGURE 2.
Purification and isolation of tetrameric Na
A, Navsp and sp-pore migrate as
monomers of ∼25 and 15 kDa, respectively, on SDS-PAGE.
B, Navsp and sp-pore elute as
tetramers from a Superdex 200 gel filtration column after
purification in 0.2% DM. The peaks positions indicated
with an asterisk correspond to ∼155 kDa
for Navsp and ∼92 kDa for sp-pore,
respectively.
Purification and isolation of tetrameric Na
A, Navsp and sp-pore migrate as
monomers of ∼25 and 15 kDa, respectively, on SDS-PAGE.
B, Navsp and sp-pore elute as
tetramers from a Superdex 200 gel filtration column after
purification in 0.2% DM. The peaks positions indicated
with an asterisk correspond to ∼155 kDa
for Navsp and ∼92 kDa for sp-pore,
respectively.
Quaternary Structure Analysis
Both protein constructs eluted at the predicted tetrameric size
(Navsp ∼155 kDa and sp-pore ∼92 kDa), which
are the molecular masses of the protein tetramers plus the approximate
mass of a DM micelle (∼33 kDa) (Fig. 2B) in the presence of sodium ions. No
monomers were evident. In the absence of sodium ions or in the presence
of other monovalent cations, tetramers are destabilized, with the pore
construct being less stable than the full-length construct (data not
shown).
Secondary Structure Determination
The secondary structures of both Navsp and sp-pore in DM were
examined using SRCD spectroscopy. This method was used rather than
conventional CD spectroscopy to enable the collection of low wavelength
data in the detergent-containing buffer and more accurate analyses of
the proteins. Navsp and sp-pore tetramers have spectra
typical of folded α helical-rich proteins (with the pore having
the appearance of a slightly more helical structure due to the larger
magnitudes of its peaks at ∼190, 208, and 222 nm) (Fig. 3A). The
secondary structures of Navsp and sp-pore were calculated to
be 52 and 55% helical, respectively. The estimated helix content
for the sp-pore based on the homology model is ∼56%, a
close match to the calculated value. The helical regions in the voltage
sensor are less well aligned with potassium sequences, so it is more
difficult to predict their extent and thus the precise secondary
structure content of the whole channel. However, it is clear that it
should be slightly lower percentage-wise than the sp-pore due to the
less extensive helical nature of S4 and the five non-helical
extramembranous segments (four loops and the N terminus). Hence, the
52% helix measured for the intact protein is in line with what
would be expected. These measurements thus indicate that both proteins
are folded with well ordered, mostly helical secondary structures.
FIGURE 3.
Secondary structures and thermal stabilities.
A, synchrotron radiation circular dichroism
spectra of Navsp (black) and sp-pore
(gray) tetramers in decyl maltoside.
B, thermal melts using CD spectroscopy
monitored at 222 nm (Navsp in black
and sp-pore in gray).
Secondary structures and thermal stabilities.
A, synchrotron radiation circular dichroism
spectra of Navsp (black) and sp-pore
(gray) tetramers in decyl maltoside.
B, thermal melts using CD spectroscopy
monitored at 222 nm (Navsp in black
and sp-pore in gray).
Stability in Vitro
The overall thermal stabilities of Navsp and sp-pore were
compared by monitoring the unfolding of the proteins using circular
dichroism spectroscopy. The secondary structures (specifically the
helical components monitored at 222 nm) of both proteins indicated that
the proteins unfolded with two-state profiles and that the channel had a
lower T than the pore (Fig. 3B). The unfolding was
irreversible for both constructs. The T
calculated for Navsp was 58 °C. However, the
T for the pore could not be
accurately measured as it had clearly not completed unfolding even at
>90 °C. The pore retained a residual helical content of
∼30% helix at this temperature, whereas the corresponding
residual helical structure of the channel was only 19%. Taken
together, these results indicate that the pore-only construct was
considerably more thermally stable than the full-length protein and
suggest either that the voltage sensor subdomain was more thermally
labile itself or that it imparted an instability/flexibility to the
intact protein.
Activity
Sodium influx was measured in the presence and absence of the calcium
channel blocker (mibefradil) previously shown to be effective against
bacterial VGSCs. Both Navsp and sp-pore demonstrated sodium
permeability (Fig. 4,
A and B). The addition of greater
than 100 μm mibefradil reduced Na+
flux in both proteins by ∼50% (Fig. 4C). This is similar to the
level of mibefradil inhibition observed in NaChBac assessed by sodium
green fluorescence (12). Thus,
both the full-length and the pore-only proteins were capable of forming
the correct pore arrangements required for Na+ channel
activity.
FIGURE 4.
Sodium flux activities of Na
A, representative time course of
22Na+ uptake into 3:1
1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-3-phosphatidylethanolamine
l-α-phosphatidylinositol liposomes reconstituted
with full-length Navsp in the absence
(circles) and presence
(triangles) of mibefradil. Background
22Na+ into protein-free
liposomes is shown for comparison (squares)
(n = 6). B, same as
in A, except that sp-pore was reconstituted
instead (n = 5). C,
concentration dependence of mibefradil block at 60 min in
Navsp (closed squares) and
sp-pore (open squares). In all cases, the lines
are simply connections between the data points rather than
theoretical fits to any model; any apparent differences between
the curves are within the experimental errors of the
measurements. The asterisks denote significance
(*, p < 0.05) at those concentrations
for both proteins relative to 0 μm mibefradil.
Error bars indicate S.E.
Sodium flux activities of Na
A, representative time course of
22Na+ uptake into 3:1
1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-3-phosphatidylethanolamine
l-α-phosphatidylinositol liposomes reconstituted
with full-length Navsp in the absence
(circles) and presence
(triangles) of mibefradil. Background
22Na+ into protein-free
liposomes is shown for comparison (squares)
(n = 6). B, same as
in A, except that sp-pore was reconstituted
instead (n = 5). C,
concentration dependence of mibefradil block at 60 min in
Navsp (closed squares) and
sp-pore (open squares). In all cases, the lines
are simply connections between the data points rather than
theoretical fits to any model; any apparent differences between
the curves are within the experimental errors of the
measurements. The asterisks denote significance
(*, p < 0.05) at those concentrations
for both proteins relative to 0 μm mibefradil.
Error bars indicate S.E.
DISCUSSION
In an attempt to make a minimal functional sodium channel based on a bacterial VGSC,
we designed and constructed a pore-only version of the Navsp channel. The
notion that this could be possible arose from the naturally occurring KcsA potassium
channel (20, 31), which contains only two-transmembrane helices and shows strong
topological similarities with the Navsp channel. In addition, various
six-transmembrane potassium channel structures have shown a wide diversity in the
geometries of the interactions between the pore and voltage sensor subdomains (14–16), and it has been
shown that it is possible to create a monomeric standalone voltage sensor subdomain
of a bacterial VGSC (17). These all suggested
that the voltage sensor and pore subdomains might both fold and function relatively
independently, and hence, a pore-only channel might be viable. Chen et
al. (32) showed that it was
possible to express a “minimal” eukaryotic sodium channel in mammalian
cells consisting of four two-transmembrane regions tethered together; this protein
exhibited toxin binding but did not conduct sodium currents. We sought to design and
purify an even simpler functional bacterial sodium pore and compare its in
vitro properties with that of the cognate full-length channel. The aim
was to create a minimalistic channel that would be suitable for biochemical,
structural, functional, and computational (molecular dynamics) studies and for
pore-blocking ligand binding studies and that could be used to test the hypothesis
that the pore subdomain is capable of folding and functioning separately of the
voltage sensor.The full-length Navsp channel and the sp-pore both formed stable tetramers
following isolation and purification in the mild non-ionic detergent DM in the
presence of NaCl. The sp-pore was tetrameric in the absence of the voltage sensor
subdomain, which suggests that the association between monomers in the channel is
largely mediated at the interfaces between the S5 and S6 transmembrane segments.
Isolated voltage sensor domains do not assemble as tetramers (17, 18). It is therefore
likely that the pore region (including its C terminus) is pivotal for forming the
tetramers in the intact channels.Circular dichroism spectroscopy has demonstrated that both the full-length and the
sp-pore are folded structures and that sp-pore is exceptionally stable under heat
treatment. The reason for this stability may be because the central core includes
intimate helix-helix interactions in the transmembrane region (a structural feature
that has been shown to be highly resistant to thermal unfolding in model systems
(33)). The pore-only construct also
contains the large C-terminal region, which has been shown to be helical (10) and has been proposed to form a coiled-coil
structure, which although not required for tetramer stability (34) may be important for initial tetramer assembly (10, 34).
The lower overall helical content found for the full-length channel suggests that on
average, it contains less ordered secondary structure, which might suggest some
flexibility in the voltage sensor loops and N-terminal region. This may be further
reflected in its loss of ordered structure at a lower temperature than in the
pore.After reconstitution, both the full-length Navsp and the sp-pore were able
to support sodium ion flux, which was blockable by the ligand mibefradil. This
ligand is believed to bind in the permeability pathway, and hence, because its
efficacy is maintained in the pore, this further suggests that the central ion
binding region is properly folded in the pore construct.In summary, these studies have indicated that the pore subdomain alone is capable of
functioning as a channel and that the selectivity filter and permeability pathways
are correctly folded. This is evidence that the pore-only protein is very similar to
the pore structure when it is associated with the voltage sensor and suggests this
simple channel could be an important tool for elucidating the structural basis of
sodium channel activity and the design and screening of potential new pore-blocking
drugs.
Authors: Gina M Clayton; Steve Altieri; Lise Heginbotham; Vinzenz M Unger; João H Morais-Cabral Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-01-23 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Ghasem Nurani; Matthew Radford; Kalypso Charalambous; Andrias O O'Reilly; Nora B Cronin; Sharmeen Haque; B A Wallace Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2008-07-12 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: M A Larkin; G Blackshields; N P Brown; R Chenna; P A McGettigan; H McWilliam; F Valentin; I M Wallace; A Wilm; R Lopez; J D Thompson; T J Gibson; D G Higgins Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2007-09-10 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Zhenhui Chen; Carmen Alcayaga; Benjamin A Suarez-Isla; Brian O'Rourke; Gordon Tomaselli; Eduardo Marban Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-04-24 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Arianna Rath; Mira Glibowicka; Vincent G Nadeau; Gong Chen; Charles M Deber Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-01-30 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Yi Liu; George J Yohrling; Yan Wang; Tasha L Hutchinson; Douglas E Brenneman; Christopher M Flores; Boyu Zhao Journal: Epilepsy Res Date: 2008-11-14 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Andrias O O'Reilly; Kalypso Charalambous; Ghasem Nurani; Andrew M Powl; B A Wallace Journal: Mol Membr Biol Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 2.857
Authors: David Shaya; Mohamed Kreir; Rebecca A Robbins; Stephanie Wong; Justus Hammon; Andrea Brüggemann; Daniel L Minor Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Shizhen Wang; Elena N Makhina; Ricard Masia; Krzysztof L Hyrc; Mary Lynn Formanack; Colin G Nichols Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Claire E Naylor; Claire Bagnéris; Paul G DeCaen; Altin Sula; Antonella Scaglione; David E Clapham; B A Wallace Journal: EMBO J Date: 2016-02-12 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Emily C McCusker; Claire Bagnéris; Claire E Naylor; Ambrose R Cole; Nazzareno D'Avanzo; Colin G Nichols; B A Wallace Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2012 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Nazzareno D'Avanzo; Emily C McCusker; Andrew M Powl; Andrew J Miles; Colin G Nichols; B A Wallace Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 3.240