Literature DB >> 21454622

Dependence of proteasome processing rate on substrate unfolding.

Allen Henderson1, Jenny Erales, Martin A Hoyt, Philip Coffino.   

Abstract

Protein degradation by eukaryotic proteasomes is a multi-step process involving substrate recognition, ATP-dependent unfolding, translocation into the proteolytic core particle, and finally proteolysis. To date, most investigations of proteasome function have focused on the first and the last steps in this process. Here we examine the relationship between the stability of a folded protein domain and its degradation rate. Test proteins were targeted to the proteasome independently of ubiquitination by directly tethering them to the protease. Degradation kinetics were compared for test protein pairs whose stability was altered by either point mutation or ligand binding, but were otherwise identical. In both intact cells and in reactions using purified proteasomes and substrates, increased substrate stability led to an increase in substrate turnover time. The steady-state time for degradation ranged from ∼5 min (dihydrofolate reductase) to 40 min (I27 domain of titin). ATP turnover was 110/min./proteasome, and was not markedly changed by substrate. Proteasomes engage tightly folded substrates in multiple iterative rounds of ATP hydrolysis, a process that can be rate-limiting for degradation.
© 2011 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21454622      PMCID: PMC3093823          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.212027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  52 in total

1.  Effects of protein stability and structure on substrate processing by the ClpXP unfolding and degradation machine.

Authors:  R E Burton; S M Siddiqui; Y I Kim; T A Baker; R T Sauer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Keepers at the final gates: regulatory complexes and gating of the proteasome channel.

Authors:  M Bajorek; M H Glickman
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  An unstructured initiation site is required for efficient proteasome-mediated degradation.

Authors:  Sumit Prakash; Lin Tian; Kevin S Ratliff; Rebecca E Lehotzky; Andreas Matouschek
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 15.369

4.  Binding of a specific ligand inhibits import of a purified precursor protein into mitochondria.

Authors:  M Eilers; G Schatz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Jul 17-23       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Coupled assay of Na+,K+-ATPase activity.

Authors:  J G Nørby
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  A 26 S protease subunit that binds ubiquitin conjugates.

Authors:  Q Deveraux; V Ustrell; C Pickart; M Rechsteiner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1994-03-11       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Ornithine decarboxylase is degraded by the 26S proteasome without ubiquitination.

Authors:  Y Murakami; S Matsufuji; T Kameji; S Hayashi; K Igarashi; T Tamura; K Tanaka; A Ichihara
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Methotrexate inhibits proteolysis of dihydrofolate reductase by the N-end rule pathway.

Authors:  J A Johnston; E S Johnson; P R Waller; A Varshavsky
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-04-07       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Prevention of rapid intracellular degradation of ODC by a carboxyl-terminal truncation.

Authors:  L Ghoda; T van Daalen Wetters; M Macrae; D Ascherman; P Coffino
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-03-17       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds.

Authors:  D Mumberg; R Müller; M Funk
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1995-04-14       Impact factor: 3.688

View more
  24 in total

1.  The proteasome-associated protein Ecm29 inhibits proteasomal ATPase activity and in vivo protein degradation by the proteasome.

Authors:  Alina De La Mota-Peynado; Stella Yu-Chien Lee; Brianne Marie Pierce; Prashant Wani; Chingakham Ranjit Singh; Jeroen Roelofs
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Ubiquitinated proteins activate the proteasomal ATPases by binding to Usp14 or Uch37 homologs.

Authors:  Andreas Peth; Nikolay Kukushkin; Marc Bossé; Alfred L Goldberg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Impact of Losing hRpn13 Pru or UCHL5 on Proteasome Clearance of Ubiquitinated Proteins and RA190 Cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Vasty Osei-Amponsa; Vinidhra Sridharan; Mayank Tandon; Christine N Evans; Kimberly Klarmann; Kwong Tai Cheng; Justin Lack; Raj Chari; Kylie J Walters
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 4.  Disordered proteinaceous machines.

Authors:  Monika Fuxreiter; Ágnes Tóth-Petróczy; Daniel A Kraut; Andreas Matouschek; Andreas T Matouschek; Roderick Y H Lim; Bin Xue; Lukasz Kurgan; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Substrate Ubiquitination Controls the Unfolding Ability of the Proteasome.

Authors:  Eden L Reichard; Giavanna G Chirico; William J Dewey; Nicholas D Nassif; Katelyn E Bard; Nickolas E Millas; Daniel A Kraut
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Mode of targeting to the proteasome determines GFP fate.

Authors:  Christopher Eric Bragança; Daniel Adam Kraut
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Principles of cotranslational ubiquitination and quality control at the ribosome.

Authors:  Stefanie Duttler; Sebastian Pechmann; Judith Frydman
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Slippery substrates impair function of a bacterial protease ATPase by unbalancing translocation versus exit.

Authors:  Priscilla Hiu-Mei Too; Jenny Erales; Joana Danica Simen; Antonija Marjanovic; Philip Coffino
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Structural insights into proteasome activation by the 19S regulatory particle.

Authors:  Aaron Ehlinger; Kylie J Walters
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  ATP binding by proteasomal ATPases regulates cellular assembly and substrate-induced functions of the 26 S proteasome.

Authors:  Young-Chan Kim; Xiaohua Li; David Thompson; George N DeMartino
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.