BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Computed tomography is an essential modality for imaging of the temporal bone. Newest generation scanners allow the coverage of large examination volumes with a single gantry rotation. The objective of this study was to compare a 128-section SST (1 single rotation of the x-ray tube) with conventional spiral MSCT (ultra-high-resolution mode) for imaging of the temporal bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four temporal bones in 27 patients were scanned with both a conventional MSCT and 128-section SST. After blinding and randomization of both examinations, 2 observers assessed the visualization of 38 anatomic structures (eg, various segments of the facial nerve canal, mallear ligaments) by using multiplanar reconstructions in the axial and coronal planes. The differences in evaluation scores obtained for the 2 techniques were analyzed by using a Wilcoxon signed rank test, with a P value of < .05 considered significant. For both methods, imaging time and radiation exposure were noted. RESULTS: Overall visualization of anatomic structures did not differ significantly between the 2 techniques (P > .05). When we compared the anatomic structures separately, there was better visualization of the lateral mallear ligament with MSCT, whereas the cochlear septa were ranked higher with SST (P < .05). Imaging time and average DLP for MSCT were 12.3 seconds and 306 mGy cm, respectively; for SST, values they were 1 second and 64 mGy cm, respectively (ie, a dose reduction of 79%). CONCLUSIONS: For imaging of the temporal bone with adequate diagnostic quality, 128-section SST can be used. The main advantages over MSCT are the dramatic reductions of imaging time and radiation exposure, which are particularly important when scanning uncooperative patients or children.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Computed tomography is an essential modality for imaging of the temporal bone. Newest generation scanners allow the coverage of large examination volumes with a single gantry rotation. The objective of this study was to compare a 128-section SST (1 single rotation of the x-ray tube) with conventional spiral MSCT (ultra-high-resolution mode) for imaging of the temporal bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four temporal bones in 27 patients were scanned with both a conventional MSCT and 128-section SST. After blinding and randomization of both examinations, 2 observers assessed the visualization of 38 anatomic structures (eg, various segments of the facial nerve canal, mallear ligaments) by using multiplanar reconstructions in the axial and coronal planes. The differences in evaluation scores obtained for the 2 techniques were analyzed by using a Wilcoxon signed rank test, with a P value of < .05 considered significant. For both methods, imaging time and radiation exposure were noted. RESULTS: Overall visualization of anatomic structures did not differ significantly between the 2 techniques (P > .05). When we compared the anatomic structures separately, there was better visualization of the lateral mallear ligament with MSCT, whereas the cochlear septa were ranked higher with SST (P < .05). Imaging time and average DLP for MSCT were 12.3 seconds and 306 mGy cm, respectively; for SST, values they were 1 second and 64 mGy cm, respectively (ie, a dose reduction of 79%). CONCLUSIONS: For imaging of the temporal bone with adequate diagnostic quality, 128-section SST can be used. The main advantages over MSCT are the dramatic reductions of imaging time and radiation exposure, which are particularly important when scanning uncooperative patients or children.
Authors: R Klingebiel; H C Bauknecht; P Rogalla; U Bockmühl; O Kaschke; M Werbs; R Lehmann Journal: Acta Otolaryngol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 1.494
Authors: K S Caldemeyer; K Sandrasegaran; C N Shinaver; V P Mathews; R R Smith; K K Kopecky Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Lorenz Jäger; Harald Bonell; Martin Liebl; Sudesh Srivastav; Viktor Arbusow; Martin Hempel; Maximilian Reiser Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-02-09 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Mathias Meyer; Holger Haubenreisser; Rainer Raupach; Bernhard Schmidt; Florian Lietzmann; Christianne Leidecker; Thomas Allmendinger; Thomas Flohr; Lothar R Schad; Stefan O Schoenberg; Thomas Henzler Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-09-08 Impact factor: 5.315