Literature DB >> 2145399

Assessing the clinical effectiveness of preventive maneuvers: analytic principles and systematic methods in reviewing evidence and developing clinical practice recommendations. A report by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

S H Woolf1, R N Battista, G M Anderson, A G Logan, E Wang.   

Abstract

This paper examines a process for evaluating clinical effectiveness and developing recommendations in which systematic methods are used to review evidence from published clinical research and to reach sound conclusions about appropriate medical policy. The methodology addresses four important components of the analytic process: (1) the criteria that must be satisfied for a clinical practice to be considered effective; (2) proper methods for reviewing evidence from published clinical research to determine whether a clinical practice meets these criteria (including methods for performing comprehensive literature reviews, for judging the quality of individual studies, and for synthesizing or pooling the results of multiple studies); (3) theoretical and practical concerns in translating the results of the scientific review into sound clinical practice recommendations; and (4) the importance of documentation, guidelines, and other safeguards to minimize the effect the reviewers themselves have on the objectivity and consistency of the analytic methods.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2145399     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90073-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  44 in total

Review 1.  Which guidelines can we trust?: Assessing strength of evidence behind recommendations for clinical practice.

Authors:  A Liberati; R Buzzetti; R Grilli; N Magrini; S Minozzi
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-04

2.  Canadian Consensus Conference on Dementia. Summary of the issues and key recommendations.

Authors:  S Wetmore; J Feightner; D Gass; G Worrall
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  [Development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines; a model project integrating external evidence and clinical expertise].

Authors:  S Steiner; K W Lauterbach
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-11-15

4.  Direct and indirect randomized trials of screening: the A's and D's of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  J Mahon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-04-04       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Ringash
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventions.

Authors:  L Rychetnik; M Frommer; P Hawe; A Shiell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 7.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening and management of developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborns.

Authors:  H Patel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Varicella vaccination--a critical review of the evidence.

Authors:  S A Skull; E E Wang
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 9.  Common errors and controversies in pharmacoeconomic analyses.

Authors:  S Byford; S Palmer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  New grades for recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.