Literature DB >> 11290685

Which guidelines can we trust?: Assessing strength of evidence behind recommendations for clinical practice.

A Liberati1, R Buzzetti, R Grilli, N Magrini, S Minozzi.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11290685      PMCID： PMC1071354          DOI： 10.1136/ewjm.174.4.262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN： 0093-0415


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

1.  Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal.

Authors:  R Grilli; N Magrini; A Penna; G Mura; A Liberati
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  J D Emerson; E Burdick; D C Hoaglin; F Mosteller; T C Chalmers
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1990-10

3.  Assessing the clinical effectiveness of preventive maneuvers: analytic principles and systematic methods in reviewing evidence and developing clinical practice recommendations. A report by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  S H Woolf; R N Battista; G M Anderson; A G Logan; E Wang
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials. Current issues and future directions.

Authors:  D Moher; A R Jadad; P Tugwell
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  Rating the quality of evidence for clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  D C Hadorn; D Baker; J S Hodges; N Hicks
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Recommendations for preventive pediatric health care. Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  North of England evidence based guidelines development project: methods of guideline development.

Authors:  M Eccles; Z Clapp; J Grimshaw; P C Adams; B Higgins; I Purves; I Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-23

8.  [Evaluation of scientific evidence].

Authors:  A J Jovell; M D Navarro-Rubio
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  1995-12-02       Impact factor: 1.725

9.  Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials.

Authors:  K F Schulz; I Chalmers; R J Hayes; D G Altman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Randomized versus historical controls for clinical trials.

Authors:  H Sacks; T C Chalmers; H Smith
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 4.965
View more
  4 in total

1.  Evidence, hierarchies, and typologies: horses for courses.

Authors:  M Petticrew; H Roberts
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

3.  The emergence of clinical practice parameter guidelines in neuro-oncology: promise of utility tempered with caution.

Authors:  Mark E Linskey
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  The impact of cancer research: how publications influence UK cancer clinical guidelines.

Authors:  G Lewison; R Sullivan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 7.640
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.