Literature DB >> 2145392

Priming effects in picture fragment completion: support for the perceptual closure hypothesis.

J G Snodgrass1, K Feenan.   

Abstract

The perceptual closure hypothesis says that priming will be optimum when just enough information is available in the prime to support closure. Across 5 experiments, a moderately complete fragmented image (Level 4) produced more priming than an almost complete (Level 7) or a very incomplete (Level 1) fragmented image. Only Level 4 priming was improved by increases in prime duration and by showing the prime again after Ss attempted to identify it. Explicit memory played little role in primed fragment completion except for Level 1 priming, in which specific fragment memory was responsible for the entire effect. In contrast, true perceptual learning was shown to be responsible for Level 4 and Level 7 priming. These priming effects cannot be accounted for by the transfer-appropriate procedures approach of Roediger and his colleagues because Level 1 priming produced less transfer to Level 1 identification at test than Level 4 priming did.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2145392     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.119.3.276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  37 in total

1.  Direct comparison of auditory implicit memory tests.

Authors:  M Pilotti; E T Bergman; D A Gallo; M Sommers; H L Roediger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-06

2.  Perceptual and lexical components of auditory repetition priming in young and older adults.

Authors:  Maura Pilotti; Tim Beyer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-03

3.  Adapting a memory framework (source monitoring) to the study of closure processes.

Authors:  Mary Ann Foley; Hugh J Foley; Lisa M Korenman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

4.  A front end to a theory of picture recognition.

Authors:  G R Loftus; J E McLean
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-09

5.  Neuroimaging evidence for object model verification theory: Role of prefrontal control in visual object categorization.

Authors:  Giorgio Ganis; Haline E Schendan; Stephen M Kosslyn
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Neurophysiological evidence for transfer appropriate processing of memory: processing versus feature similarity.

Authors:  Haune E Schendan; Malra Kutas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

7.  Object imagery and object identification: object imagers are better at identifying spatially-filtered visual objects.

Authors:  Manila Vannucci; Giuliana Mazzoni; Carlo Chiorri; Lavinia Cioli
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-01-24

8.  Not all visual features are created equal: early processing in letter and word recognition.

Authors:  Sophie N Lanthier; Evan F Risko; Jennifer A Stolz; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

9.  Do already grasped objects activate motor affordances?

Authors:  Cristina Iani; Luca Ferraro; Natale Vincenzo Maiorana; Vittorio Gallese; Sandro Rubichi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-07

10.  Differential effects of diazepam and lorazepam on repetition priming in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  F Sellal; J M Danion; F Kauffmann-Muller; D Grangé; J L Imbs; M Van der Linden; L Singer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.