Literature DB >> 17972722

Neurophysiological evidence for transfer appropriate processing of memory: processing versus feature similarity.

Haune E Schendan1, Malra Kutas.   

Abstract

Transfer appropriate processing (TAP) accounts propose that memory is a function of the degree to which the same neural processes transfer appropriately from the study experience to the memory test. However, in prior research, study and test stimuli were often similar physically. In two experiments, event-related brain potentials (ERPs) were recorded to fragmented objects during an indirect memory test to isolate transfer of a specific perceptual process from overlap of physical features between experiences. An occipitotemporoparietal P2(00) at 200 msec showed implicit memory effects only when similar perceptual grouping processes of good continuation were repeatedly engaged-despite physical feature differences--as TAP accounts hypothesize. This result provides direct neurophysiological evidence for the critical role of process transfer across experiences for memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17972722     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  25 in total

1.  Time course of processes and representations supporting visual object identification and memory.

Authors:  Haline E Schendan; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Selective and nonselective transfer: positive and negative priming in a multiple-task environment.

Authors:  Jason P Leboe; Bruce W A Whittlesea; Bruce Milliken
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Neurophysiological evidence for the time course of activation of global shape, part, and local contour representations during visual object categorization and memory.

Authors:  Haline E Schendan; Marta Kutas
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Priming contour-deleted images: evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition.

Authors:  I Biederman; E E Cooper
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Effects of size and orientation change on hippocampal activation during episodic recognition: a PET study.

Authors:  D L Schacter; A Uecker; E Reiman; L S Yun; D Bandy; K Chen; L A Cooper; T Curran
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-12-22       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. II. Contours bridging gaps.

Authors:  E Peterhans; R von der Heydt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Perceptual identification thresholds for 150 fragmented pictures from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart picture set.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1988-08

8.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding.

Authors:  Irving Biederman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; M Vanderwart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Learn       Date:  1980-03

10.  Neural correlates of relational memory: successful encoding and retrieval of semantic and perceptual associations.

Authors:  Steven E Prince; Sander M Daselaar; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  10 in total

1.  Never Seem to Find the Time: Evaluating the Physiological Time Course of Visual Word Recognition with Regression Analysis of Single Item ERPs.

Authors:  Sarah Laszlo; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014

2.  Electrophysiological distinctions between recognition memory with and without awareness.

Authors:  Philip C Ko; Bryant Duda; Erin P Hussey; Brandon A Ally
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  The temporal dynamics of visual object priming.

Authors:  Philip C Ko; Bryant Duda; Erin P Hussey; Emily J Mason; Brandon A Ally
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Top-down modulation of visual processing and knowledge after 250 ms supports object constancy of category decisions.

Authors:  Haline E Schendan; Giorgio Ganis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-16

5.  Early spatial frequency processing of natural images: an ERP study.

Authors:  Andrea De Cesarei; Serena Mastria; Maurizio Codispoti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Event-Related Potential Effects of Object Repetition Depend on Attention and Part-Whole Configuration.

Authors:  Angela Gosling; Volker Thoma; Jan W de Fockert; Alan Richardson-Klavehn
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  How the visual cortex handles stimulus noise: insights from amblyopia.

Authors:  Éva M Bankó; Judit Körtvélyes; Béla Weiss; Zoltán Vidnyánszky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Emotional face recognition deficit in amnestic patients with mild cognitive impairment: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Linlin Yang; Xiaochuan Zhao; Lan Wang; Lulu Yu; Mei Song; Xueyi Wang
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.570

9.  Validation of the C.A.R.E. stimulus set of 640 animal pictures: Name agreement and quality ratings.

Authors:  Natalie Russo; Carl Erick Hagmann; Rosemary Andrews; Conner Black; Magenta Silberman; Nicole Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Perception Accuracy of Affiliative Relationships in Elementary School Children and Young Adolescents.

Authors:  João R Daniel; Rita R Silva; António J Santos; Jordana Cardoso; Leandra Coelho; Miguel Freitas; Olívia Ribeiro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-03
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.