Literature DB >> 21453049

Role of pharmacokinetics in establishing bioequivalence for orally inhaled drug products: workshop summary report.

Dennis O'Connor1, Wallace P Adams, Mei-Ling Chen, Peter Daley-Yates, John Davis, Hartmut Derendorf, Murray P Ducharme, Anders Fuglsang, Myra Herrle, Günther Hochhaus, Susan M Holmes, Sau L Lee, Bing V Li, Svetlana Lyapustina, Stephen Newman, Martin Oliver, Beverley Patterson, Joanne Peart, Guirag Poochikian, Partha Roy, Tushar Shah, Gur Jai Pal Singh, Sandra Suarez Sharp.   

Abstract

In April 2010 a workshop on the "Role of Pharmacokinetics in Establishing Bioequivalence for Orally Inhaled Drug Products" was sponsored by the Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI) in coordination with Respiratory Drug Delivery (RDD) 2010. The objective of the workshop was to evaluate the current state of knowledge and identify gaps in information relating to the potential use of pharmacokinetics (PK) as the key indicator of in vivo bioequivalence (BE) of locally acting orally inhaled products (OIPs). In addition, the strengths and limitations of the PK approach to detect differences in product performance compared with in vitro and pharmacodynamic (PD)/clinical/therapeutic equivalence (TE) studies were discussed. The workshop discussed the relationship between PK and lung deposition, in vitro assessment, and PD studies and examined potential PK study designs that could serve as pivotal BE studies. It has been recognized that the sensitivity to detect differences in product performance generally decreases as one moves from in vitro testing to PD measurements. The greatest challenge in the use of PD measurements with some OIPs (particularly inhaled corticosteroids) is the demonstration of a dose-response relationship (for local effects), without which the bioassay, and hence a PD study, may not have sufficient sensitivity to detect differences in product performance. European authorities allow demonstration of in vivo BE of OIPs based solely on pharmacokinetic studies. This workshop demonstrated broader interest among discipline experts and regulators to explore approaches for the use of PK data as the key determinant of in vivo equivalence of locally acting OIPs. If accepted, the suggested approach (PK alone or in conjunction with in vitro tests) could potentially be applied to demonstrate BE of certain orally inhaled drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21453049     DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2011.0878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv        ISSN: 1941-2711            Impact factor:   2.849


  9 in total

1.  A Systematic Analysis of the Sensitivity of Plasma Pharmacokinetics to Detect Differences in the Pulmonary Performance of Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate Products Using a Model-Based Simulation Approach.

Authors:  Benjamin Weber; Guenther Hochhaus
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Regulatory Considerations for Approval of Generic Inhalation Drug Products in the US, EU, Brazil, China, and India.

Authors:  Sau L Lee; Bhawana Saluja; Alfredo García-Arieta; Gustavo Mendes Lima Santos; Ying Li; Sarah Lu; Shuguang Hou; Juliet Rebello; Abhijit Vaidya; Jaideep Gogtay; Shrinivas Purandare; Svetlana Lyapustina
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  Pharmacokinetics of Orally Inhaled Drug Products.

Authors:  Günther Hochhaus; Stephen Horhota; Leslie Hendeles; Sandra Suarez; Juliet Rebello
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  In Vivo-Relevant Transwell Dish-Based Dissolution Testing for Orally Inhaled Corticosteroid Products.

Authors:  Masahiro Sakagami; Hua Li; Jügen Venitz
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Introduction: Aerosol delivery of orally inhaled agents.

Authors:  Timothy E Corcoran; Sunalene G Devadason; Philip J Kuehl
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.849

6.  Validating Whole-Airway CFD Predictions of DPI Aerosol Deposition at Multiple Flow Rates.

Authors:  P Worth Longest; Geng Tian; Navvab Khajeh-Hosseini-Dalasm; Michael Hindle
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.849

7.  In Vitro, Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Safety Comparisons of Single and Combined Administration of Tiotropium and Salmeterol in COPD Patients Using Different Dry Powder Inhalers.

Authors:  Stephen T Horhota; Jan A van Noord; Cynthia B Verkleij; Loek J Bour; Ashish Sharma; Michael Trunk; Piet J G Cornelissen
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Performance of Multiple-Batch Approaches to Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence Testing for Orally Inhaled Drug Products with Batch-to-Batch Variability.

Authors:  Elise Burmeister Getz; Kevin J Carroll; J David Christopher; Beth Morgan; Scott Haughie; Alessandro Cavecchi; Christopher Wiggenhorn; Hayden Beresford; Helen Strickland; Svetlana Lyapustina
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.246

9.  Pharmacokinetic studies for proving bioequivalence of orally inhaled drug products-critical issues and concepts.

Authors:  Karan Thakkar; Suyog Mhatre; Manish Jadhav; Sailendra Goswami; Rajen Shah
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.810

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.