Literature DB >> 25794622

In Vitro, Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Safety Comparisons of Single and Combined Administration of Tiotropium and Salmeterol in COPD Patients Using Different Dry Powder Inhalers.

Stephen T Horhota1, Jan A van Noord, Cynthia B Verkleij, Loek J Bour, Ashish Sharma, Michael Trunk, Piet J G Cornelissen.   

Abstract

In vitro Andersen cascade impactor-sized mass (ISM) and aerodynamic fine particle mass (FPM) <5 μm for tiotropium and salmeterol combined in a novel inhalation powder formulation containing 7.5 μg tiotropium/25 μg salmeterol (TSHH) were similar (within ±15%) to reference products containing 18 μg of tiotropium (Spiriva® HandiHaler®) (TioHH) and 50 μg of salmeterol (Serevent® Diskus®) (SalD). The pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of the novel fixed-dose TSHH formulation administered once daily was compared with the single-agent therapies TioHH (once daily [qd]) and SalD (twice daily [bid]) and with the jointly administered combination of TioHH (qd) plus SalD (bid) in a randomized, 22-week, open-label, four-way crossover study in 50 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). For tiotropium, TSHH and TioHH were bioequivalent based on mean steady-state plasma area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC), while the urinary excretion amount was higher for TSHH and not bioequivalent to TioHH. Tiotropium peak plasma concentrations at steady state (C max,ss) were 40% higher with TSHH. For salmeterol, substantial differences were observed in plasma AUCs and Cmax,ss. No significant differences in 8-h forced expiratory volume in 1 s or forced vital capacity were detected for the TSHH (qd) against the combination of TioHH (qd) with SalD (bid). Maintenance therapy with tiotropium plus salmeterol as TSHH or as the jointly administered reference products is superior to either agent alone, safe, and well tolerated in COPD patients. In vitro results were not predictive of clinical PK findings for both tiotropium and salmeterol for the TSHH dry powder inhaler product.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25794622      PMCID: PMC4476986          DOI: 10.1208/s12248-015-9751-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  19 in total

Review 1.  Solubility prediction of salmeterol xinafoate in water--dioxane mixtures.

Authors:  A Jouyban-Gharamaleki; P York; M Hanna; B J Clark
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2001-03-23       Impact factor: 5.875

2.  A pharmacokinetic simulation tool for inhaled corticosteroids.

Authors:  Benjamin Weber; Guenther Hochhaus
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 3.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of salmeterol.

Authors:  Mario Cazzola; Renato Testi; Maria Gabriella Matera
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Inhaled salmeterol: a review of its efficacy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  B Jarvis; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Workshop summary.

Authors:  R A Pauwels; A S Buist; P M Calverley; C R Jenkins; S S Hurd
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol delivered as a combination dry powder from a capsule-based inhaler and a multidose inhaler in asthma and COPD patients.

Authors:  Peter T Daley-Yates; Rashmi Mehta; Robert H Chan; Simona X Despa; Margaret D Louey
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.849

7.  Influence of the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system on nocturnal bronchial obstruction.

Authors:  D S Postma; J J Keyzer; G H Koëter; H J Sluiter; K De Vries
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 6.124

Review 8.  Minimal clinically important differences in pharmacological trials.

Authors:  Paul W Jones; Kai M Beeh; Kenneth R Chapman; Marc Decramer; Donald A Mahler; Jadwiga A Wedzicha
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 9.  Combination bronchodilator therapy in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Donald P Tashkin; Gary T Ferguson
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2013-05-08

10.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tiotropium solution and tiotropium powder in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  J M Hohlfeld; A Sharma; J A van Noord; P J G Cornelissen; E Derom; L Towse; V Peterkin; B Disse
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.126

View more
  6 in total

1.  Current Scientific and Regulatory Approaches for Development of Orally Inhaled and Nasal Drug Products: Overview of the IPAC-RS/University of Florida Orlando Inhalation Conference.

Authors:  Guenther Hochhaus; Craig Davis-Cutting; Martin Oliver; Sau L Lee; Svetlana Lyapustina
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Bioequivalence Evaluations of Generic Dry Powder Inhaler Drug Products: Similarities and Differences Between Japan, USA, and the European Union.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kuribayashi; Toru Yamaguchi; Hanaka Sako; Tomoko Takishita; Kazunori Takagi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Response to Sharma et al.: Long Pulmonary Residence Time and Plasma Half-Life of Tiotropium: Implications for Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence Studies.

Authors:  Jaime Algorta
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Pharmacodynamic model of slow reversible binding and its applications in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling: review and tutorial.

Authors:  Tianjing Ren; Xu Zhu; Natalie M Jusko; Wojciech Krzyzanski; William J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.410

Review 5.  What to consider before prescribing inhaled medications: a pragmatic approach for evaluating the current inhaler landscape.

Authors:  Federico Lavorini; Christer Janson; Fulvio Braido; Georgios Stratelis; Anders Løkke
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

6.  Lung deposition of inhaled once-daily long-acting muscarinic antagonists via standard jet nebulizer or dry powder inhaler, measured using functional respiratory imaging, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Glenn D Crater; Karmon Johnson; Jonathan Ward; Jan De Backer
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 4.031

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.