Literature DB >> 21451099

Early identification and management of psychological risk factors ("yellow flags") in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal.

Michael K Nicholas1, Steven J Linton, Paul J Watson, Chris J Main.   

Abstract

Originally the term "yellow flags" was used to describe psychosocial prognostic factors for the development of disability following the onset of musculoskeletal pain. The identification of yellow flags through early screening was expected to prompt the application of intervention guidelines to achieve secondary prevention. In recent conceptualizations of yellow flags, it has been suggested that their range of applicability should be confined primarily to psychological risk factors to differentiate them from other risk factors, such as social and environmental variables. This article addresses 2 specific questions that arise from this development: (1) Can yellow flags influence outcomes in people with acute or subacute low back pain? and (2) Can yellow flags be targeted in interventions to produce better outcomes? Consistent evidence has been found to support the role of various psychological factors in prognosis, although questions remain about which factors are the most important, both individually and in combination, and how they affect outcomes. Published early interventions have reported mixed results, but, overall, the evidence suggests that targeting yellow flags, particularly when they are at high levels, does seem to lead to more consistently positive results than either ignoring them or providing omnibus interventions to people regardless of psychological risk factors. Psychological risk factors for poor prognosis can be identified clinically and addressed within interventions, but questions remain in relation to issues such as timing, necessary skills, content of treatments, and context. In addition, there is still a need to elucidate mechanisms of change and better integrate this understanding into the broader context of secondary prevention of chronic pain and disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21451099     DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20100224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  157 in total

1.  Distressed, immobilized, or lacking employer support? A sub-classification of acute work-related low back pain.

Authors:  Silje Endresen Reme; William S Shaw; Ivan A Steenstra; Mary Jane Woiszwillo; Glenn Pransky; Steven J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-12

2.  Construct and predictive validity of the German Örebro questionnaire short form for psychosocial risk factor screening of patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; T Kohlmann; M Pfingsten; G Lindena; U Marnitz; K Pfeifer; J F Chenot
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Advances in the diagnosis of degenerated lumbar discs and their possible clinical application.

Authors:  Marco Brayda-Bruno; Marta Tibiletti; Keita Ito; Jeremy Fairbank; Fabio Galbusera; Alberto Zerbi; Sally Roberts; Ellen Wachtel; Yulia Merkher; Sarit Sara Sivan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Development of appropriateness criteria for the surgical treatment of symptomatic lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS).

Authors:  A F Mannion; V Pittet; F Steiger; J-P Vader; H-J Becker; F Porchet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Work disability prevention research: current and future prospects.

Authors:  G S Pransky; P Loisel; J R Anema
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-09

6.  Subgrouping for patients with low back pain: a multidimensional approach incorporating cluster analysis and the STarT Back Screening Tool.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 5.820

7.  Does Coordinated, Multidisciplinary Treatment Limit Medical Disability and Attrition Related to Spine Conditions in the US Navy?

Authors:  Gregg Ziemke; Marco Campello; Rudi Hiebert; Shira Schecter Weiner; Chris Rennix; Margareta Nordin
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Core Outcome Measure Index for low back patients: do we miss anxiety and depression?

Authors:  C Cedraschi; M Marty; D S Courvoisier; V Foltz; G Mahieu; C Demoulin; A Gierasimowicz Fontana; M Norberg; P de Goumoëns; S Rozenberg; S Genevay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Psychometric Evaluation of the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) Tool: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity.

Authors:  Katie A Butera; Steven Z George; Trevor A Lentz
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 10.  Practical assessment in patients suffering from musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Mohammad Keilani; Andrew J Haig; Richard Crevenna
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2015-12-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.