Literature DB >> 31541719

Psychometric Evaluation of the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) Tool: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity.

Katie A Butera1, Steven Z George2, Trevor A Lentz3.   

Abstract

Psychological characteristics consistently predict clinical outcomes for musculoskeletal pain conditions. The Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) tool assesses negative mood, fear-avoidance, and positive affect/coping. Psychometric testing of the tool is needed to guide clinical use. The purpose of this secondary analysis was to determine the OSPRO-YF factor structure (17- and 10-item versions) and test factor reliability and concurrent validity. Data from 2 musculoskeletal pain cohorts (n1 = 428; n2 = 440) were used. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) identified the factor structure in the first cohort; a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) validated the factor structure in the second cohort. EFA yielded 4 factors for the 17-item version (catastrophizing, positive coping, negative mood, fear-avoidance) and 3 factors for the 10-item version (negative coping, negative mood positive affect/coping). CFA indicated good fit for the10-item and 17-item models. Factors from both versions demonstrated moderate to good test-retest reliability. Regression results revealed that factors from both versions contributed significantly to variance in pain intensity, disability, and quality of life. Results indicate the OSPRO-YF is a reliable and valid multidimensional psychological assessment tool for individuals with musculoskeletal pain. Future studies are needed to establish the OSPRO-YF as a prognostic and treatment monitoring tool. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the psychometric properties of the OSPRO-YF tool. Findings indicate the OSPRO-YF is a reliable and valid multidimensional psychological assessment tool for individuals with musculoskeletal pain. Implementation of the OSPRO-YF tool may better guide clinical decision making and may lead to improved musculoskeletal pain management strategies.
Copyright © 2019 United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pain-related psychological characteristics; multidimensional screening; musculoskeletal pain; pain; psychological assessment; psychometric evaluation; yellow flags

Year:  2019        PMID: 31541719      PMCID: PMC7078059          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain        ISSN: 1526-5900            Impact factor:   5.820


  47 in total

1.  Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures.

Authors:  M P Jensen; J A Turner; J M Romano; L D Fisher
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 2.  The Neck Disability Index: state-of-the-art, 1991-2008.

Authors:  Howard Vernon
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Report of the NIH Task Force on research standards for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Samuel F Dworkin; Dagmar Amtmann; Gunnar Andersson; David Borenstein; Eugene Carragee; John Carrino; Roger Chou; Karon Cook; Anthony Delitto; Christine Goertz; Partap Khalsa; John Loeser; Sean Mackey; James Panagis; James Rainville; Tor Tosteson; Dennis Turk; Michael Von Korff; Debra K Weiner
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-02

4.  Depressive symptoms, anatomical region, and clinical outcomes for patients seeking outpatient physical therapy for musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Rogelio A Coronado; Jason M Beneciuk; Carolina Valencia; Mark W Werneke; Dennis L Hart
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-01-13

Review 5.  Early identification and management of psychological risk factors ("yellow flags") in patients with low back pain: a reappraisal.

Authors:  Michael K Nicholas; Steven J Linton; Paul J Watson; Chris J Main
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-03-30

6.  Low back pain subgroups using fear-avoidance model measures: results of a cluster analysis.

Authors:  Jason M Beneciuk; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Race, care seeking, and utilization for chronic back and neck pain: population perspectives.

Authors:  Timothy S Carey; Janet K Freburger; G Mark Holmes; Anne Jackman; Stefanie Knauer; Andrea Wallace; Jane Darter
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 5.820

Review 8.  Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review.

Authors:  Matthew J Bair; Rebecca L Robinson; Wayne Katon; Kurt Kroenke
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-11-10

9.  Differential predictors of pain and disability in patients with whiplash injuries.

Authors:  Michael J L Sullivan; William Stanish; Maureen E Sullivan; Dean Tripp
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.037

10.  The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity.

Authors:  H Vernon; S Mior
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.437

View more
  8 in total

1.  Injury-related psychological distress and the association with perceived running ability in injured runners.

Authors:  Benjamin Maschke; Allison Palmsten; Evan O Nelson; Michael C Obermeier; Megan Reams; Bryan Heiderscheit; Hayley Russell; Terese L Chmielewski
Journal:  Phys Ther Sport       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 2.365

2.  Elevated Kinesiophobia Is Associated With Reduced Recovery From Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Injuries in Military and Civilian Cohorts.

Authors:  Ruth L Chimenti; Molly S Pacha; Natalie A Glass; Mathew Frazier; Amy O Bowles; Andrew D Valantine; Kristin R Archer; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2022-02-01

3.  Empirically derived back pain subgroups differentiated walking performance, pain, and disability.

Authors:  Katie A Butera; Emily J Fox; Mark D Bishop; Stephen A Coombes; Steven Z George
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 7.926

4.  Development of Reliable and Valid Negative Mood Screening Tools for Orthopaedic Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain.

Authors:  Trevor A Lentz; Michael A Kallen; Daniel Deutscher; Steven Z George
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish Yellow Flag Questionnaire in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  Meltem Koç; Zilan Bazancir; Hakan Apaydın; Burcu Talu; Kılıçhan Bayar
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2021-10-01

6.  Psychometric evaluation of the Decision Support Tool for Functional Independence in community-dwelling older people.

Authors:  S C van Bijsterveld; J A Barten; E A L M Molenaar; N Bleijenberg; N J de Wit; C Veenhof
Journal:  J Popul Ageing       Date:  2022-03-29

7.  Willingness to use nonpharmacologic treatments for musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Stephanie A Eucker; Shawna Foley; Sarah Peskoe; Alexander Gordee; Thomas Risoli; Frances Morales; Steven Z George
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2022-08-17

8.  Derivation of a Risk Assessment Tool for Prediction of Long-Term Pain Intensity Reduction After Physical Therapy.

Authors:  Maggie E Horn; Steven Z George; Cai Li; Sheng Luo; Trevor A Lentz
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.133

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.