BACKGROUND: The role of continued trastuzumab after progression in women with human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2+ metastatic breast cancer is controversial. Controlled clinical trials that establish a benefit from continued trastuzumab have been difficult to complete. METHODS: In the National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network (NCCN) Breast Cancer Outcomes Database, we identified women treated with trastuzumab for metastatic or relapsed HER-2+ breast cancer at eight NCCN centers who subsequently progressed. Patients were eligible for this analysis if they initiated treatment at an NCCN institution between July 1997 and December 2004, received trastuzumab-containing treatment, and progressed while on therapy. We calculated the proportion of patients who received trastuzumab after progression, and in a multivariate analysis assessed the association of patient and provider characteristics with continued trastuzumab therapy. RESULTS: Our final cohort consisted of 218 women who experienced disease progression while on trastuzumab-containing therapy. Of these, 168 (77%) continued trastuzumab. Of these, 36 patients (17%) received therapy as part of a clinical trial. The only factors significantly associated with continuation of trastuzumab beyond progression were the presence of bone metastases and more recent year of development of progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to the availability of any high-quality evidence supporting this practice, over three quarters of patients treated with trastuzumab for HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer at eight NCCN centers continued therapy beyond progression. Further work is needed to understand how physicians adopt new treatments when there is ambiguity surrounding their benefit.
BACKGROUND: The role of continued trastuzumab after progression in women with humanepidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2+ metastatic breast cancer is controversial. Controlled clinical trials that establish a benefit from continued trastuzumab have been difficult to complete. METHODS: In the National Comprehensive Cancer Center Network (NCCN) Breast Cancer Outcomes Database, we identified women treated with trastuzumab for metastatic or relapsed HER-2+ breast cancer at eight NCCN centers who subsequently progressed. Patients were eligible for this analysis if they initiated treatment at an NCCN institution between July 1997 and December 2004, received trastuzumab-containing treatment, and progressed while on therapy. We calculated the proportion of patients who received trastuzumab after progression, and in a multivariate analysis assessed the association of patient and provider characteristics with continued trastuzumab therapy. RESULTS: Our final cohort consisted of 218 women who experienced disease progression while on trastuzumab-containing therapy. Of these, 168 (77%) continued trastuzumab. Of these, 36 patients (17%) received therapy as part of a clinical trial. The only factors significantly associated with continuation of trastuzumab beyond progression were the presence of bone metastases and more recent year of development of progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to the availability of any high-quality evidence supporting this practice, over three quarters of patients treated with trastuzumab for HER-2+ metastatic breast cancer at eight NCCN centers continued therapy beyond progression. Further work is needed to understand how physicians adopt new treatments when there is ambiguity surrounding their benefit.
Authors: Rupert Bartsch; Catharina Wenzel; Gabriela Altorjai; Ursula Pluschnig; Margaretha Rudas; Robert M Mader; Michael Gnant; Christoph C Zielinski; Guenther G Steger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-08-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Caprice K Christian; Joyce Niland; Stephen B Edge; Rebecca A Ottesen; Melissa E Hughes; Richard Theriault; John Wilson; Charles A Hergrueter; Jane C Weeks Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: D J Slamon; B Leyland-Jones; S Shak; H Fuchs; V Paton; A Bajamonde; T Fleming; W Eiermann; J Wolter; M Pegram; J Baselga; L Norton Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-03-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: José A García-Sáenz; Miguel Martín; Javier Puente; Sara López-Tarruella; Antonio Casado; Fernando Moreno; Enrique Grande; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Filippo Montemurro; Stefania Redana; Giuseppe Viale; Giuseppina Sanna; Michela Donadio; Giorgio Valabrega; Barbara del Curto; Alberto Bottini; Gerardo Botti; Angelo Paolo dei Tos; Maria Elena Jacomuzzi; Maurizio Di Bonito; Saverio Danese; Matteo Clavarezza; Janina Kulka; Silvana Di Palma; Antonio Durando; Anna Sapino; Massimo Aglietta Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Gunter von Minckwitz; Andreas du Bois; Marcus Schmidt; Nicolai Maass; Tanja Cufer; Felix E de Jongh; Eduard Maartense; Christoph Zielinski; Manfred Kaufmann; Wolfgang Bauer; Klaus H Baumann; Michael R Clemens; Ralph Duerr; Christoph Uleer; Michael Andersson; Robert C Stein; Valentina Nekljudova; Sibylle Loibl Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jean-Marc Extra; Eric C Antoine; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Thierry Delozier; Pierre Kerbrat; Anne Bethune-Volters; Jean-Paul Guastalla; Marc Spielmann; Louis Mauriac; Jean-Louis Misset; Daniel Serin; Mario Campone; Christophe Hebert; Céline Remblier; Loïc Bergougnoux; Frank Campana; Moïse Namer Journal: Oncologist Date: 2010-07-29