Literature DB >> 21444867

Long-term outcome and quality of life of patients with endometrial carcinoma treated with or without pelvic radiotherapy in the post operative radiation therapy in endometrial carcinoma 1 (PORTEC-1) trial.

Remi A Nout1, Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse, Marnix L M Lybeert, Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis, Jan J Jobsen, Jan Willem M Mens, Ludy C H W Lutgens, Betty Pras, Wim L J van Putten, Carien L Creutzberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the long-term outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) treated with or without pelvic radiotherapy in the Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma 1 (PORTEC-1) trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1990 and 1997, 714 patients with stage IC grade 1 to 2 or IB grade 2 to 3 EC were randomly allocated to pelvic external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or no additional treatment (NAT). HRQL was evaluated with the Short Form 36-Item (SF-36) questionnaire; subscales from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PR25 module for bowel and bladder symptoms and the OV28 and CX24 modules for sexual symptoms; and demographic questions. Analysis was by intention-to-treat.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 13.3 years. The 15-year actuarial locoregional recurrence rates were 5.8% for EBRT versus 15.5% for NAT (P < .001), and 15-year overall survival was 52% versus 60% (P = .14). Of the 351 patients confirmed to be alive with correct address, 246 (70%) returned the questionnaire. Patients treated with EBRT reported significant (P < .01) and clinically relevant higher rates of urinary incontinence, diarrhea, and fecal leakage leading to more limitations in daily activities. Increased symptoms were reflected by the frequent use of incontinence materials after EBRT (day and night use, 42.9% v 15.2% for NAT; P < .001). Patients treated with EBRT reported lower scores on the SF-36 scales "physical functioning" (P = .004) and "role-physical" (P = .003).
CONCLUSION: EBRT for endometrial cancer is associated with long-term urinary and bowel symptoms and lower physical and role-physical functioning, even 15 years after treatment. Despite its efficacy in reducing locoregional recurrence, EBRT should be avoided in patients with low- and intermediate-risk EC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21444867     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.4590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  54 in total

1.  Endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Kimberly K Leslie; Kristina W Thiel; Michael J Goodheart; Koen De Geest; Yichen Jia; Shujie Yang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Effects of radiation therapy on the structure and function of the pelvic floor muscles of patients with cancer in the pelvic area: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stéphanie Bernard; Marie-Pier Ouellet; Hélène Moffet; Jean-Sébastien Roy; Chantale Dumoulin
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Radiotherapy: avoiding EBRT for those without high-risk endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Lisa Hutchinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Rectal bleeding after radiation therapy for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Devarati Mitra; Remi Nout; Paul J Catalano; Carien Creutzberg; Nicole Cimbak; Larissa Lee; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 5.  Lymphovascular Space Invasion as a Risk Factor in Early Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Azmat H Sadozye; Rosie L Harrand; Nick S Reed
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Radiotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: Current Standards and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Matthias F Häfner; Jürgen Debus
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2016-06-16

7.  Surgical and systemic management of endometrial cancer: an international survey.

Authors:  Christina Fotopoulou; Robert Kraetschell; Sean Dowdy; Keiichi Fujiwara; Nobuo Yaegashi; Domenica Larusso; Antonio Casado; Sven Mahner; Thomas J Herzog; Sean Kehoe; Ignace Vergote; David Scott Miller; Christian Marth; Shingo Fujii; Jalid Sehouli
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.344

8.  MR- versus CT-based high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Sophia C Kamran; Matthias M Manuel; Paul Catalano; Linda Cho; Antonio L Damato; Larissa J Lee; Ehud J Schmidt; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  To operate or to radiate: the added value of the maximal standardized uptake value in PET-FDG in cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Itamar Netzer; Shehrban Sobeh; Zohar Keidar; Lior Lowenstein; Ofer Lavie; Rahamim Ben Yosef; Amnon Amit
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Assessment of patient-reported measures of bowel function before and after pelvic radiotherapy: an ancillary study of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group study N00CA.

Authors:  Pamela J Atherton; Michele Y Halyard; Jeff A Sloan; Robert C Miller; Richard L Deming; T H Patricia Tai; Kathy J Stien; James A Martenson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.