Literature DB >> 25315381

Surgical and systemic management of endometrial cancer: an international survey.

Christina Fotopoulou1, Robert Kraetschell, Sean Dowdy, Keiichi Fujiwara, Nobuo Yaegashi, Domenica Larusso, Antonio Casado, Sven Mahner, Thomas J Herzog, Sean Kehoe, Ignace Vergote, David Scott Miller, Christian Marth, Shingo Fujii, Jalid Sehouli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To ascertain the spectrum of clinical management of endometrial carcinoma (EC) the largest international survey was conducted to evaluate and identify differences worldwide.
METHODS: After validation of a 15-item questionnaire regarding surgical and adjuvant treatment of EC in Germany, an English-adapted questionnaire was put online and posted to all the major gynecological cancer Societies worldwide for further distribution commencing in 2010 and continued for 26 months.
RESULTS: A total of 618 Institutions around the world participated: Central Europe (CE), Southern Europe (SE), Northern Europe (NE), Asia and USA/Canada/UK. Both a therapeutic and staging value was attributed to systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection (LND) in CE (74.6%) and in Asia (67.2%), as opposed to USA/UK where LND was mainly for staging purposes (53.5%; p < 0.001). LND was performed up to the renal veins in CE in 86.8%, in Asia in 80.8%, in USA/UK in 51.2% and in SE in 45.1% (p < 0.001) of cases. In advanced disease, centers from Asia were treated most with adjuvant chemotherapy alone (93.6%), as opposed to centers in SE, CE and UK/USA that employed combination chemo-radiotherapy in 90.9% (p < 0.001) of cases. Paclitaxel/carboplatin was mostly used followed by doxorubicin/cisplatin (75 vs. 23.3%; p < 0.001). In total, 94% of all participants supported the concept of treating EC patients within appropriate clinical trials.
CONCLUSIONS: There is broad range in both the surgical and adjuvant treatment of EC across different countries. Large-scale multicenter prospective trials are warranted to establish consistent, evidence-based guidelines to optimize treatment worldwide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25315381      PMCID: PMC5814301          DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3510-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  30 in total

1.  New surgical staging of endometrial cancer: 20 years later.

Authors:  Andrea Mariani; Sean C Dowdy; Karl C Podratz
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 2.  Current therapy of patients with endometrial carcinoma. A critical review.

Authors:  S Marnitz; C Köhler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Vaginal brachytherapy versus pelvic external beam radiotherapy for patients with endometrial cancer of high-intermediate risk (PORTEC-2): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised trial.

Authors:  R A Nout; V T H B M Smit; H Putter; I M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; J J Jobsen; L C H W Lutgens; E M van der Steen-Banasik; J W M Mens; A Slot; M C Stenfert Kroese; B N F M van Bunningen; A C Ansink; W L J van Putten; C L Creutzberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Survival after relapse in patients with endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  Carien L Creutzberg; Wim L J van Putten; Peter C Koper; Marnix L M Lybeert; Jan J Jobsen; Carla C Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Karin A J De Winter; Ludy C H W Lutgens; Alfons C M van den Bergh; Elzbieta van der Steen-Banasik; Henk Beerman; Mat van Lent
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Systematic pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy in intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer: lymph-node mapping and identification of predictive factors for lymph-node status.

Authors:  Christina Fotopoulou; Konstantinos Savvatis; Robert Kraetschell; Joerg C Schefold; Werner Lichtenegger; Jalid Sehouli
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 6.  Current issues in the management of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Jesus Gonzalez-Bosquet; Nadia N Laack; Andrea Mariani; Sean C Dowdy
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.616

7.  Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Stefano Basile; Francesco Maneschi; Andrea Alberto Lissoni; Mauro Signorelli; Giovanni Scambia; Roberto Angioli; Saverio Tateo; Giorgia Mangili; Dionyssios Katsaros; Gaetano Garozzo; Elio Campagnutta; Nicoletta Donadello; Stefano Greggi; Mauro Melpignano; Francesco Raspagliesi; Nicola Ragni; Gennaro Cormio; Roberto Grassi; Massimo Franchi; Diana Giannarelli; Roldano Fossati; Valter Torri; Mariangela Amoroso; Clara Crocè; Costantino Mangioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging.

Authors:  Andrea Mariani; Sean C Dowdy; William A Cliby; Bobbie S Gostout; Monica B Jones; Timothy O Wilson; Karl C Podratz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  The role of radiotherapy in endometrial cancer: current evidence and trends.

Authors:  Carien L Creutzberg; Remi A Nout
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study.

Authors:  H Kitchener; A M C Swart; Q Qian; C Amos; M K B Parmar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sentinel-lymph-node mapping with indocyanine green in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for early endometrial cancer: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  V Cela; C Sergiampietri; M E Rosa Obino; G Bifulco; P Giovanni Artini; F Papini
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2020-03-27

2.  A Lymph Node Count-Based AJCC Staging System Facilitates a More Accurate Prediction of the Prognosis of Patients With Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Xinlong Huo; Shufang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Sentinel node biopsy for diagnosis of lymph node involvement in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Hans Nagar; Nina Wietek; Richard J Goodall; Will Hughes; Mia Schmidt-Hansen; Jo Morrison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-09

4.  Controversies in the management of endometrial cancer: a survey of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Authors:  Jung Yun Lee; Kidong Kim; Taek Sang Lee; Sokbom Kang; Seok Ju Seong; Jae Weon Kim; Byoung Gie Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.401

5.  Less Invasive Endometrial Cancer Surgery with Extraperitoneal Pelvic and Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy via a Small Midline Abdominal Incision and the Retroperitoneal Approach.

Authors:  Shinichi Komiyama; Chiaki Takeya; Rena Takahashi; Sumito Nagasaki; Kaneyuki Kubushiro
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Preoperative Monocyte Count as a Mirror of Tumor Characteristics and Likelihood of Recurrence in Endometrial Carcinoma Cases

Authors:  Mitra Modares Gilani; Zohreh Kazemi; Narges Zamani; Hadis Shahrami; Akram Ghahghaei-Nezamabadi; Soureh Sheikham
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-04-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.