Literature DB >> 23549865

To operate or to radiate: the added value of the maximal standardized uptake value in PET-FDG in cervical cancer patients.

Itamar Netzer1, Shehrban Sobeh, Zohar Keidar, Lior Lowenstein, Ofer Lavie, Rahamim Ben Yosef, Amnon Amit.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of death among women with gynecological malignancies. In early stages of the disease (IB-IIA), surgical treatment alone is usually the treatment of choice. However, some high-risk patients are referred for postoperative chemo-radiotherapy, leading to increased morbidity. Maximal Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) is a positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT)-derived semiquantitative measurement of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in a defined lesion and may reflect tumor aggressiveness. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative high SUVmax values can be used for the selection of initial therapy, thus reducing the side effects resulting from bimodal treatment. PET-CT studies of 46 cervical cancer patients who underwent surgery were reviewed, and SUVmax data were collected. Statistical analyses were performed to determine the relationships between SUVmax values and clinical parameters, modalities of treatment, and outcomes. SUVmax was found to correlate with depth of tumor invasion (r = 0.46, p < 0.003). A statistically significant correlation was also found between SUVmax and histological grade, with the mean and variance of SUVmax significantly lower for grade one, as compared to grades two and three (mean 1.10, 11.06, and 8.88; variance 3.57, 45.60, and 29.79, respectively; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.076). A possible SUVmax cutoff value of 10.08 was identified as a potential indicator of increased risk for receiving bimodal treatment, with a sensitivity of 61.5 % and a specificity of 75.8 %. SUVmax can be used for differentiating early-stage cervical cancer patients who will need postoperative adjuvant treatment and therefore can serve as an additional modality to reduce the need for bimodal therapy in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23549865     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-013-0558-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  24 in total

Review 1.  Focus on endometrial and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Lora Hedrick Ellenson; T-C Wu
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 31.743

2.  Correlation of high 18F-FDG uptake to clinical, pathological and biological prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  David Groheux; Sylvie Giacchetti; Jean-Luc Moretti; Raphael Porcher; Marc Espié; Jacqueline Lehmann-Che; Anne de Roquancourt; Anne-Sophie Hamy; Caroline Cuvier; Laetitia Vercellino; Elif Hindié
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Global cancer statistics, 2002.

Authors:  D Max Parkin; Freddie Bray; J Ferlay; Paola Pisani
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Bradford P Whitcomb
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  The variation of prognostic significance of Maximum Standardized Uptake Value of [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography in different histological subtypes and pathological stages of surgically resected Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.

Authors:  Christian Casali; Marina Cucca; Giulio Rossi; Fausto Barbieri; Laura Iacuzio; Bruno Bagni; Morandi Uliano
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 5.705

6.  Radiation therapy alone in the treatment of carcinoma of the uterine cervix. II. Analysis of complications.

Authors:  C A Perez; S Breaux; J M Bedwinek; H Madoc-Jones; H M Camel; J A Purdy; B J Walz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Predictors of severe gastrointestinal toxicity after external beam radiotherapy and interstitial brachytherapy for advanced or recurrent gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Mohit Kasibhatla; Robert W Clough; Gustavo S Montana; James R Oleson; Kim Light; Beverley A Steffey; Ellen L Jones
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Cervical cancer histology and tumor differentiation affect 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kidd; Christopher R Spencer; Phyllis C Huettner; Barry A Siegel; Farrokh Dehdashti; Janet S Rader; Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  The prognostic value of PET and PET/CT in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Perry W Grigsby
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.909

10.  Standardized uptake value in para-aortic lymph nodes is a significant prognostic factor in patients with primary advanced squamous cervical cancer.

Authors:  Tzu-Chen Yen; Lai-Chu See; Chyong-Huey Lai; Chien-Sheng Tsai; Angel Chao; Swei Hsueh; Ji-Hong Hong; Ting-Chang Chang; Koon-Kwan Ng
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  1 in total

1.  Metabolic activity determines survival depending on the level of lymph node involvement in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Alejandra Martinez; Elodie Chantalat; Martina Aida Angeles; Gwénaël Ferron; Anne Ducassou; Manon Daix; Justine Attal; Sarah Bétrian; Amélie Lusque; Erwan Gabiache
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 4.638

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.