Literature DB >> 21439535

Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients with angina pectoris presenting with bundle branch block.

Sameer Bansilal1, Ashish Aneja, Verghese Mathew, Guy S Reeder, Peter A Smars, Ryan J Lennon, Heather J Wiste, Kay Traverse, Michael E Farkouh.   

Abstract

Long-term outcomes of unselected patients with angina pectoris and bundle branch block (BBB) on initial electrocardiogram are not well established. The Olmsted County Chest Pain Study is a community-based cohort of 2,271 consecutive patients presenting to 3 Olmsted County emergency departments with angina from 1985 through 1992. Patients were followed for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and revascularization at 30 days and over a median follow-up period of 7.3 years and for mortality only through a median of 16.6 years. Cox models were used to estimate associations between BBB and cardiovascular outcomes. Mean age of the cohort on presentation was 63 years, and 58% were men. MACEs at 30 days occurred in 11% with right BBB (RBBB), 8.8% with left BBB (LBBB), and 6.4% in patients without BBB (p = 0.17). Over a median follow-up of 7.3 years, patients with BBB were at higher risk for MACEs (RBBB, hazard ratio [HR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44 to 2.38, p <0.001; LBBB, HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.56, p <0.001) compared to those without BBB. Over a median of 16.6 years, the 2 BBB groups had lower survival rates than patients without BBB (RBBB, HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.73 to 2.78, p <0.001; LBBB, HR 3.32, 95% CI 2.67 to 4.13, p ≤0.001), but after adjustment for multiple risk factors an increased risk of mortality for LBBB remained significant. In conclusion, appearance of LBBB or RBBB in patients presenting with angina predicts adverse long-term cardiovascular outcomes compared to patients without BBB.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21439535      PMCID: PMC3257859          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.01.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  26 in total

1.  Natural history of isolated bundle branch block.

Authors:  G J Fahy; S L Pinski; D P Miller; N McCabe; C Pye; M J Walsh; K Robinson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-06-01       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Effect of bundle branch block patterns on mortality in hospitalized patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Alon Barsheshet; Jonathan Leor; Uri Goldbourt; Moshe Garty; Roseline Schwartz; Solomon Behar; David Luria; Michael Eldar; Michael Glikson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Risk factor implications of incidentally discovered uncomplicated bundle branch block.

Authors:  Wayne L Miller; Karla V Ballman; David O Hodge; Richard J Rodeheffer; Stephen C Hammill
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Complete bundle branch block as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality: report of 7,073 patients referred for nuclear exercise testing.

Authors:  B Hesse; L A Diaz; C E Snader; E H Blackstone; M S Lauer
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Bundle-branch block in middle-aged men: risk of complications and death over 28 years. The Primary Prevention Study in Göteborg, Sweden.

Authors:  Peter Eriksson; Lars Wilhelmsen; Annika Rosengren
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Comparison of the prognostic effect of left versus right versus no bundle branch block on presenting electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty in the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials.

Authors:  Mayra Guerrero; Kishore Harjai; Gregg W Stone; Bruce Brodie; David Cox; Judy Boura; Lorelei Grines; William O'Neill; Cindy Grines
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Usefulness of either or both left and right bundle branch block at baseline or during follow-up for predicting death in patients following acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Nigussie Bogale; Stein Orn; Margaret James; Kathleen McCarroll; Antonio Bayès de Luna; Kenneth Dickstein
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Effect of intraventricular dyssynchrony on diastolic function and exercise tolerance in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Quirino Ciampi; Bruno Petruzziello; Michele Della Porta; Salvatore Caputo; Vincenzo Manganiello; Costantino Astarita; Bruno Villari
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-07-14

9.  Bundle-branch block and in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators.

Authors:  A S Go; H V Barron; A C Rundle; J P Ornato; A L Avins
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  20-year trends in clinical characteristics, therapy and short-term prognosis in acute myocardial infarction according to presenting electrocardiogram: the MONICA/KORA AMI Registry (1985-2004).

Authors:  B Kuch; M Heier; W von Scheidt; B Kling; A Hoermann; C Meisinger
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 8.989

View more
  10 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics and value in early reperfusion therapy for new onset right bundle branch block in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jingchao Li; Xiaodong Li; Shujuan Dong; Yapan Yang; Yingjie Chu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Particularities of coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients with left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Larisa Anghel; Catalina Arsenescu Georgescu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2014-12

3.  Evolving considerations in the management of patients with left bundle branch block and suspected myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ian J Neeland; Michael C Kontos; James A de Lemos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Prognostic Significance of Right Bundle Branch Block for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Li Xiang; Anyuan Zhong; Tao You; Jianchang Chen; Weiting Xu; Minhua Shi
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-03-27

5.  Ischemia modified albumin (IMA) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). Does it make the difference?

Authors:  Mohamed Abdel Kader Abdel Wahab
Journal:  Egypt Heart J       Date:  2017-02-20

6.  Implications of Left Bundle Branch Block in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: Propensity Match Analysis from the National Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Dipesh Ludhwani; Mouyyad Rahaby; Vasu Patel; Saad Jamil; Adam Kedzia; Chunyi Wu
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2019-07-17

7.  Clinical Characteristics Predicting Worse Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA).

Authors:  Piotr Szolc; Łukasz Niewiara; Paweł Kleczyński; Krzysztof Bryniarski; Elżbieta Ostrowska-Kaim; Kornelia Szkodoń; Piotr Brzychczy; Krzysztof Żmudka; Jacek Legutko; Bartłomiej Guzik
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-08-26

8.  Decision tree model for predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest among patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Hong Li; Ting Ting Wu; Dong Liang Yang; Yang Song Guo; Pei Chang Liu; Yuan Chen; Li Ping Xiao
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Effects of Newly Developed Right Versus Left Bundle Branch Block on the QRS Axis, T-wave Axis and Frontal QRS-T Angle in Patients with a Narrow QRS.

Authors:  Satoshi Kurisu; Kazuhiro Nitta; Noriaki Watanabe; Hiroki Ikenaga; Ken Ishibashi; Yukihiro Fukuda; Yukiko Nakano
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 1.271

10.  Clinical characteristics and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis of different subtypes of bundle-branch block.

Authors:  Tongjian Zhu; Mingxian Chen; Wei Hu; Benfang Wang; Hong Jiang
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 1.468

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.