Literature DB >> 9841600

Bundle-branch block and in-hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 Investigators.

A S Go1, H V Barron, A C Rundle, J P Ornato, A L Avins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left bundle-branch block (BBB) is considered an important predictor of poor outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction, but the consequences of right BBB are not well understood.
OBJECTIVES: To 1) estimate the prevalence of left and right BBB in patients with myocardial infarction; 2) compare the clinical characteristics of and treatments received by patients with left, right, or no BBB; and 3) determine the independent association of left BBB and right BBB with in-hospital death.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Multicenter registry of 1571 U.S. hospitals. PATIENTS: 297,832 patients with acute myocardial infarction who had left, right, or no BBB on initial electrocardiography. MEASUREMENTS: Presence and type of BBB, clinical characteristics of patients, therapies given, and in-hospital death.
RESULTS: Patients with left BBB (n = 19,967; 6.7%) or right BBB (n = 18,354; 6.2%) were older and had more comorbid illness and congestive heart failure than patients with no BBB. Among patients for whom thrombolytic therapy was clearly indicated, fewer patients with left or right BBB (16.6% and 32.0%, respectively) than patients with no BBB (66.5%) received this therapy (P < 0.001). Fewer patients with left or right BBB (60.6% and 67.3%, respectively) than patients with no BBB (75.6%) received aspirin within the first 24 hours (P < 0.001), and fewer patients with left or right BBB (23.9% and 31.8%, respectively) than patients with no BBB (40.4%) received beta-blockers within the first 24 hours (P < 0.001). Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates were almost twice as high for patients with left or right BBB (22.6% and 23.0%, respectively) as for patients with no BBB (13.1%) (P < 0.001). Compared with no BBB and no ST-segment elevation, left BBB was associated with a 34% increase (odds ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.28 to 1.39]) and right BBB was associated with a 64% increase (odds ratio, 1.64 [CI, 1.57 to 1.71]) in the risk for in-hospital death, after adjustment for potential confounders.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute myocardial infarction, prevalences of right and left BBB are similar. Patients with BBB have more comorbid conditions, are less likely to receive therapy, and have an increased risk for in-hospital death compared with patients with no BBB. Compared with left BBB, right BBB seems to be a stronger independent predictor of in-hospital death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9841600     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-129-9-199811010-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  20 in total

1.  Left Bundle Branch Block and Complete Heart Block Complicating Inferior Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Jillian S Gruber; Brad Stair; Mehmet Aktas; Katia Bravo-Jaimes
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Fragmented QRS and QRS Duration As a Marker of Myocardial Reperfusion Measured by Myocardial Blush Grade in Reperfusion Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Raymond Pranata; Emir Yonas; Veresa Chintya; Amir Aziz Alkatiri
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2019-08-21

3.  Continuous ST-segment monitoring of patients with right bundle branch block and suspicion of acute myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Gunnar Gunnarsson; Peter Eriksson; Mikael Dellborg
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Evolving considerations in the management of patients with left bundle branch block and suspected myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ian J Neeland; Michael C Kontos; James A de Lemos
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Long-term cardiovascular outcomes in patients with angina pectoris presenting with bundle branch block.

Authors:  Sameer Bansilal; Ashish Aneja; Verghese Mathew; Guy S Reeder; Peter A Smars; Ryan J Lennon; Heather J Wiste; Kay Traverse; Michael E Farkouh
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Post-myocardial infarction intraventricular conduction defects and B-type natriuretic peptide levels.

Authors:  Katarzyna Ciuraszkiewicz; Marianna Janion; Janusz Sielski; Dariusz Dudek; Zenon Gawor
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Tachyarrhythmias, bradyarrhythmias and acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Trappe
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2010-04

8.  Clinical implications of QRS duration and QT peak prolongation in patients with suspected coronary disease referred for elective cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  M Nadeem Attar; Kenneth Wong; David G Groves; Nick Newall; David R Ramsdale; Roger K Moore
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.468

9.  Body surface mapping improves early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chest pain and left bundle branch block.

Authors:  S J Maynard; I B A Menown; G Manoharan; J Allen; J McC Anderson; A A J Adgey
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Thirty-year trends (1975-2005) in the magnitude, patient characteristics, and hospital outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Robert J Goldberg; Jorge Yarzebski; Frederick A Spencer; Juan C Zevallos; Darleen Lessard; Joel M Gore
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.