Literature DB >> 11239842

Complete bundle branch block as an independent predictor of all-cause mortality: report of 7,073 patients referred for nuclear exercise testing.

B Hesse1, L A Diaz, C E Snader, E H Blackstone, M S Lauer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Complete left bundle branch block is a well-established independent risk factor for mortality, but the prognostic importance of right bundle branch block is unclear. We determined whether left and right bundle branch block was associated with all-cause mortality risk after adjustment for potential confounders, including clinical, exercise, and nuclear scintigraphic variables. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We studied 7,073 adults who were referred for symptom-limited nuclear exercise testing. Patients with heart failure or pacemakers were excluded. The presence or absence of bundle branch block was determined from resting electrocardiograms. The main outcome measure was all-cause mortality during a mean of 6.7 years of follow-up.
RESULTS: One hundred ninety patients (3%) had complete right bundle branch block, and 150 (2%) had complete left bundle branch block. There were 825 deaths (12%). Mortality was greater in patients with complete right bundle branch block (24% [46 of 190]) or left bundle branch block (24% [36 of 150]) than in those without these findings (11% [779 of 6,883 and 789 of 6,923, respectively]; both P <0.0001). After adjustment for potential confounders, right bundle branch block was as strong an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 2.1; P = 0.007) as left bundle branch block (HR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.0 to 2.0; P = 0.017). Incomplete right bundle branch block was not associated with mortality.
CONCLUSION: Complete right and left bundle branch block are independent predictors of all-cause mortality risk even after adjustment for exercise capacity, nuclear perfusion defects, and other risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11239842     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00713-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  27 in total

Review 1.  Window to the heart: the value of a native and paced QRS duration. Current perspective and review.

Authors:  Himanshu H Shukla; Erskine A James; John A Schutz; Benjamin F Lloyd; Greg C Flaker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Several common variants modulate heart rate, PR interval and QRS duration.

Authors:  Hilma Holm; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; David O Arnar; Gudmar Thorleifsson; Gudmundur Thorgeirsson; Hrafnhildur Stefansdottir; Sigurjon A Gudjonsson; Aslaug Jonasdottir; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Inger Njølstad; Audhild Nyrnes; Tom Wilsgaard; Erin M Hald; Kristian Hveem; Camilla Stoltenberg; Maja-Lisa Løchen; Augustine Kong; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-01-10       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 3.  Does cardiac resynchronization therapy benefit patients with right bundle branch block: left ventricular free wall pacing: seldom right for right bundle branch block.

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06

Review 4.  Re-evaluating the electro-vectorcardiographic criteria for left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Andrés Ricardo Pérez-Riera; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Rodrigo Daminello-Raimundo; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Marcos Célio de Almeida; Jani Rankinen; Fabio Baeub Soler; Kjell Nikus
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Electrocardiographic abnormalities in centenarians and octogenarians: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Ghassan Moubarak; Vincent Algalarrondo; Nicolas Badenco; Aurélie Guiot; Pierre-Jean Guillausseau; Jean-François Bergmann; Thomas Bardin; Antoine Leenhardt; Alain Cohen Solal
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  Prolongation of QRS duration and axis deviation in the right bundle branch block are not markers for left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

Authors:  Eric R Uyguanco; Anthony Mirandi; Ghazanfar Qureshi; Jason Lazar; Amit Chhabra; John Kassotis
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2010

7.  Right ventricular electrical and mechanical synchronization by properly timed septal pacing in a patient with right bundle branch block and first degree AV block--a case report.

Authors:  Calin Siliste; Maria-Claudia-Berenice Suran; Andrei-Dumitru Margulescu; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 1.468

8.  Association of long-term air pollution with ventricular conduction and repolarization abnormalities.

Authors:  Victor C Van Hee; Adam A Szpiro; Ronald Prineas; Jonathan Neyer; Karol Watson; David Siscovick; Sung Kyun Park; Joel D Kaufman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Post-myocardial infarction intraventricular conduction defects and B-type natriuretic peptide levels.

Authors:  Katarzyna Ciuraszkiewicz; Marianna Janion; Janusz Sielski; Dariusz Dudek; Zenon Gawor
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  Prolonged electrocardiogram QRS duration independently predicts long-term mortality in patients hospitalized for heart failure with preserved systolic function.

Authors:  Scott L Hummel; Stephen Skorcz; Todd M Koelling
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 5.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.