Literature DB >> 21436335

Angioplasty and stenting of atherosclerotic middle cerebral arteries with Wingspan: evaluation of clinical outcome, restenosis, and procedure outcome.

S C H Yu1, T W H Leung, K T Lee, J W Y Hui, L K S Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: MCA is a common location of intracranial stenosis. It is relatively more peripherally located and of a smaller caliber, and could therefore be a site technically more challenging and risky for angioplasty and stenting. The study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcome, restenosis rate, and procedural safety of Wingspan stent placement for atherosclerosis in the MCA compared with stenosis in other arteries.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent Wingspan stent placement for symptomatic intracranial stenosis of ≥70% (or stenosis of ≥50% for recurrent ischemia despite medical therapy) were recruited prospectively and allocated into a study group (MCA stenosis, n=35) and a control group (other stenosis, n=25). Primary end points were the following: 1) all stroke or death rate at 1 year, and 2) significant in-stent restenosis rate at 1 year. Secondary end points were the following: 1) periprocedural complications within 24 hours, rate of TIA during the procedure, all stroke or death rate within 30 days; and 2) the inability to complete the procedure due to technical problems.
RESULTS: Results of study group versus the control group were the following: degree of stenosis, 78.4 ± 10.9% versus 72.5 ± 11.2% (P value=.0456); diameter of stenosis, 0.6 ± 0.3 versus 1.0 ± 0.5 mm (P=.0017); all stroke or death rate at 1 year, 14.3% versus 12% (OR=1.22); in-stent restenosis rate at 1 year, 10% versus 10.5% (OR=1.05); periprocedural complication rate at 24 hours, 2.9% versus 4% (OR=0.70); TIA rate during the procedure, 8.6% versus 4% (OR=2.25); all stroke or death rate at 30 days, 5.7% versus 12% (OR=0.44); and technical failure rate, 2.9% versus 0%.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, there were no significant differences in procedural safety, patient outcome, and restenosis rates of stent placement between the group with MCA stenosis and the group with stenoses located at other sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21436335      PMCID: PMC7965883          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  19 in total

1.  Predictors of ischemic stroke in the territory of a symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Scott E Kasner; Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Harriet Howlett-Smith; Barney J Stern; Vicki S Hertzberg; Michael R Frankel; Steven R Levine; Seemant Chaturvedi; Curtis G Benesch; Cathy A Sila; Tudor G Jovin; Jose G Romano; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-23       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis: outcome of patients who fail antithrombotic therapy.

Authors:  V N Thijs; G W Albers
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-08-22       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Advances in stroke research: basic science, treatment, and clinical trials outcomes. Highlights of the 29th International Stroke Conference, February 5-7, 2004, San Diego, CA.

Authors: 
Journal:  Rev Neurol Dis       Date:  2004

4.  US multicenter experience with the wingspan stent system for the treatment of intracranial atheromatous disease: periprocedural results.

Authors:  David Fiorella; Elad I Levy; Aquilla S Turk; Felipe C Albuquerque; David B Niemann; Beverly Aagaard-Kienitz; Ricardo A Hanel; Henry Woo; Peter A Rasmussen; L Nelson Hopkins; Thomas J Masaryk; Cameron G McDougall
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Influence of patient age and stenosis location on wingspan in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  A S Turk; E I Levy; F C Albuquerque; G L Pride; H Woo; B G Welch; D B Niemann; P D Purdy; B Aagaard-Kienitz; P A Rasmussen; L N Hopkins; T J Masaryk; C G McDougall; D Fiorella
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Risk factors associated with major cerebrovascular complications after intracranial stenting.

Authors:  F Nahab; M J Lynn; S E Kasner; M J Alexander; R Klucznik; O O Zaidat; J Chaloupka; H Lutsep; S Barnwell; M Mawad; B Lane; M I Chimowitz
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Follow-up study after intracranial percutaneous transluminal cerebral balloon angioplasty.

Authors:  T Mori; M Fukuoka; K Kazita; K Mori
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Angiographic patterns of Wingspan in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Felipe C Albuquerque; Elad I Levy; Aquilla S Turk; David B Niemann; Beverly Aagaard-Kienitz; G Lee Pride; Phillip D Purdy; Babu G Welch; Henry H Woo; Peter A Rasmussen; L Nelson Hopkins; Thomas J Masaryk; Cameron G McDougall; David J Fiorella
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Consensus conference on intracranial atherosclerotic disease: rationale, methodology, and results.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Edward Feldmann; Camilo R Gomez; S Claiborne Johnston; Scott E Kasner; Donald C Quick; Peter A Rasmussen; M Fareed K Suri; Robert A Taylor; Osama O Zaidat
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Prognosis of patients with symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis. The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  16 in total

1.  Temporal correlation between wall shear stress and in-stent stenosis after Wingspan stent in swine model.

Authors:  M Fujimoto; H Takao; T Suzuki; Y Shobayashi; F Mayor; S Tateshima; M Yamamoto; Y Murayama; F Viñuela
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Outcomes of middle cerebral artery angioplasty and stenting with Wingspan at a high-volume center.

Authors:  Zi-Liang Wang; Bu-Lang Gao; Tian-Xiao Li; Dong-Yang Cai; Liang-Fu Zhu; Jiang-Yu Xue; Wei-Xing Bai; Zhao-Shuo Li
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Tandem Short-length Multi-stent Construct for Emergent Revascularization of Occlusive Long-segment Left Middle Cerebral Artery In-stent Stenosis.

Authors:  Torin W Karsonovich; Brittany R Bolt; Ajeet Gordhan
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-04-15

Review 4.  Stenting in Intracranial Stenosis: Current Controversies and Future Directions.

Authors:  Arindam R Chatterjee; Colin P Derdeyn
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.113

5.  Symptom differences and pretreatment asymptomatic interval affect outcomes of stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  M D Alexander; P M Meyers; J D English; T R Stradford; S Sung; W S Smith; V V Halbach; R T Higashida; C F Dowd; D L Cooke; S W Hetts
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis.

Authors:  Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Colin P Derdeyn; Tanya N Turan; David Fiorella; Bethany F Lane; L Scott Janis; Helmi L Lutsep; Stanley L Barnwell; Michael F Waters; Brian L Hoh; J Maurice Hourihane; Elad I Levy; Andrei V Alexandrov; Mark R Harrigan; David Chiu; Richard P Klucznik; Joni M Clark; Cameron G McDougall; Mark D Johnson; G Lee Pride; Michel T Torbey; Osama O Zaidat; Zoran Rumboldt; Harry J Cloft
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Incidence and Risk Factors of In-Stent Restenosis for Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  G Peng; Y Zhang; Z Miao
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Detailed analysis of periprocedural strokes in patients undergoing intracranial stenting in Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS).

Authors:  David Fiorella; Colin P Derdeyn; Michael J Lynn; Stanley L Barnwell; Brian L Hoh; Elad I Levy; Mark R Harrigan; Richard P Klucznik; Cameron G McDougall; G Lee Pride; Osama O Zaidat; Helmi L Lutsep; Michael F Waters; J Maurice Hourihane; Andrei V Alexandrov; David Chiu; Joni M Clark; Mark D Johnson; Michel T Torbey; Zoran Rumboldt; Harry J Cloft; Tanya N Turan; Bethany F Lane; L Scott Janis; Marc I Chimowitz
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Undersized angioplasty and stenting of symptomatic intracranial tight stenosis with Enterprise: Evaluation of clinical and vascular outcome.

Authors:  Kun-Yu Lee; David Yen-Ting Chen; Hui-Ling Hsu; Chi-Jen Chen; Ying-Chi Tseng
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 1.610

10.  A Comparison of Safety and Effectiveness Between Wingspan and Neuroform Stents in Patients With Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Kai Zhou; Yuan Cao; Xiao-Hui He; Zhong-Ming Qiu; Shuai Liu; Zi-Li Gong; Jie Shuai; Qing-Wu Yang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.