Zi-Liang Wang1, Bu-Lang Gao2, Tian-Xiao Li3, Dong-Yang Cai1, Liang-Fu Zhu1, Jiang-Yu Xue1, Wei-Xing Bai1, Zhao-Shuo Li1. 1. Stroke Center, Zhengzhou University Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University, 7 Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450003, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Medical Research, Shijiazhuang First Hospital, Hebei Medical University, Hebei, People's Republic of China. 3. Stroke Center, Zhengzhou University Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University, 7 Weiwu Road, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, 450003, People's Republic of China. litianxiaod@163.com.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study was to investigate the periprocedural stroke rates, safety, and long-term effect of Wingspan stenting for symptomatic severe stenosis of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) at a high-volume center. METHODS: Between July 2007 and April 2013, 196 consecutive patients with severe MCA atherosclerotic stenosis (≥70%) who were treated with Wingspan stenting were retrospectively studied. All patients had arterial stenosis-related temporary ischemic attack or strokes. The demographic data, cerebral angiography, technical success rate, periprocedural complications, and clinical and imaging follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: The successful stenting rate was 98.0%, and the stenosis rate was improved from pre-stenting (80.6 ± 8.3 %) to post-stenting (15.5 ± 6.8%). The 30-day periprocedural stroke or death rate was 7.1%, with a disabling or fatal rate of 2.6%. The perioprocedural stroke rate was significantly (P < 0.01) greater in the early learning stage (16.0%) than in the later technical maturation stage (4.1%). The total periprocedural ischemic and perforator stroke rates were greater in patients with the most stenosis in the distal MCA 1/3 segment (6.8 and 5.7%, respectively) than in the proximal and middle 2/3 segments (0.9 and 0%, respectively). The ipsilateral stroke or death rate beyond 30 days (6-69 months, mean 30 ± 16) was 4.8%, with the 1- and 2-year cumulative stroke rates of 9.6 and 12.1%, respectively. Imaging follow-up 6-69 months (mean 10.9 ± 8.5) revealed restenosis in 21 cases (20.4 %). CONCLUSION: Intracranial stenting of MCA stenoses may have the potential of better clinical outcomes if patients are properly selected and treated by an experienced operator at a high-volume center.
INTRODUCTION: This study was to investigate the periprocedural stroke rates, safety, and long-term effect of Wingspan stenting for symptomatic severe stenosis of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) at a high-volume center. METHODS: Between July 2007 and April 2013, 196 consecutive patients with severe MCA atherosclerotic stenosis (≥70%) who were treated with Wingspan stenting were retrospectively studied. All patients had arterial stenosis-related temporary ischemic attack or strokes. The demographic data, cerebral angiography, technical success rate, periprocedural complications, and clinical and imaging follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: The successful stenting rate was 98.0%, and the stenosis rate was improved from pre-stenting (80.6 ± 8.3 %) to post-stenting (15.5 ± 6.8%). The 30-day periprocedural stroke or death rate was 7.1%, with a disabling or fatal rate of 2.6%. The perioprocedural stroke rate was significantly (P < 0.01) greater in the early learning stage (16.0%) than in the later technical maturation stage (4.1%). The total periprocedural ischemic and perforator stroke rates were greater in patients with the most stenosis in the distal MCA 1/3 segment (6.8 and 5.7%, respectively) than in the proximal and middle 2/3 segments (0.9 and 0%, respectively). The ipsilateral stroke or death rate beyond 30 days (6-69 months, mean 30 ± 16) was 4.8%, with the 1- and 2-year cumulative stroke rates of 9.6 and 12.1%, respectively. Imaging follow-up 6-69 months (mean 10.9 ± 8.5) revealed restenosis in 21 cases (20.4 %). CONCLUSION: Intracranial stenting of MCA stenoses may have the potential of better clinical outcomes if patients are properly selected and treated by an experienced operator at a high-volume center.
Authors: Walther N K A van Mook; Roger J M W Rennenberg; Geert Willem Schurink; Robert Jan van Oostenbrugge; Werner H Mess; Paul A M Hofman; Peter W de Leeuw Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Larry B Goldstein; Cheryl D Bushnell; Robert J Adams; Lawrence J Appel; Lynne T Braun; Seemant Chaturvedi; Mark A Creager; Antonio Culebras; Robert H Eckel; Robert G Hart; Judith A Hinchey; Virginia J Howard; Edward C Jauch; Steven R Levine; James F Meschia; Wesley S Moore; J V Ian Nixon; Thomas A Pearson Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-12-02 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: A S Turk; E I Levy; F C Albuquerque; G L Pride; H Woo; B G Welch; D B Niemann; P D Purdy; B Aagaard-Kienitz; P A Rasmussen; L N Hopkins; T J Masaryk; C G McDougall; D Fiorella Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-11-07 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Marios Psychogios; Alex Brehm; Elena López-Cancio; Gian Marco De Marchis; Elena Meseguer; Aristeidis H Katsanos; Christine Kremer; Peter Sporns; Marialuisa Zedde; Adam Kobayashi; Jildaz Caroff; Daniel Bos; Sabrina Lémeret; Avtar Lal; Juan F Arenillas Journal: Eur Stroke J Date: 2022-06-03