Literature DB >> 21435613

Clinical determinants of radiation dose in percutaneous coronary interventional procedures: influence of patient size, procedure complexity, and performing physician.

Kenneth A Fetterly1, Ryan J Lennon, Malcolm R Bell, David R Holmes, Charanjit S Rihal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this work were to establish the primary clinical determinants of patient radiation dose associated with percutaneous coronary interventional (PCI) and to identify opportunities for dose reduction.
BACKGROUND: Use of X-ray imaging and associated radiation dose is a necessary part of PCI. Potential adverse consequences of radiation dose include skin radiation injury and predicted increase in lifetime cancer risk.
METHODS: Cumulative skin dose (CSD) (measured in gray [Gy] units) was selected as a measurement of patient radiation burden. Several patient-, disease-, and treatment-related variables, including 15 performing physicians, were analyzed in a multiple linear regression statistical model with cumulative skin dose CSD as the primary end point. The model results provide an estimate of the relative CSD increase (decrease) attributable to each variable.
RESULTS: Percutaneous coronary interventions performed on 1,287 male and 540 female patients were included. Median patient age was 68.6 years, median body mass index was 29.7 kg/m(2), and median weight was 88 kg. Median CSD was 1.64 Gy per procedure for male and 1.15 Gy for female patients. Increasing body mass index, patient sex, lesion complexity, lesion location, and performing physician were significantly associated with CSD. Physicians who performed more procedures were associated with lower CSD.
CONCLUSIONS: Several primary determinants of patient radiation dose during PCI were identified. Along with physician development of radiation-sparing methods and skills, pre-procedure dose planning is proposed to help minimize radiation dose for PCI.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21435613     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  20 in total

1.  Temporal trends of fluoroscopy time and contrast utilization in coronary chronic total occlusion revascularization: insights from a multicenter United States registry.

Authors:  Tesfaldet T Michael; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Emmanouil S Brilakis; Mohammed Alomar; Shuaib M Abdullah; Ben L Kirkland; Katrina L Mishoe; Nicholas Lembo; Anna Kalynych; Harold Carlson; Subhash Banerjee; Michael Luna; William Lombardi; David E Kandzari
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Evaluation of radiological risk during coronary angioplasty procedures: comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches.

Authors:  Piotr Iwachow; Izabela Miechowicz; Piotr Kałmucki; Beata Dziki; Andrzej Szyszka; Artur Baszko; Tomasz Siminiak
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  High-Dose Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures in Patients: Radiation Management Recommendations for Interventionalists.

Authors:  Madan M Rehani; Donald L Miller; Vinit Baliyan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Reducing radiation exposure during invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions implementing a simple four-step protocol.

Authors:  Moritz Seiffert; Francisco Ojeda; Kai Müllerleile; Elvin Zengin; Christoph Sinning; Christoph Waldeyer; Edith Lubos; Ulrich Schäfer; Karsten Sydow; Stefan Blankenberg; Dirk Westermann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Impact of StentBoost subtract imaging on patient radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Zhigeng Jin; Shengli Yang; Limin Jing; Huiliang Liu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-03-03       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Contrast Utilization During Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From a Contemporary Multicenter Registry.

Authors:  Georgios E Christakopoulos; Dimitri Karmpaliotis; Khaldoon Alaswad; Robert W Yeh; Farouc A Jaffer; R Michael Wyman; William Lombardi; J Aaron Grantham; David A Kandzari; Nicholas Lembo; Jeffrey W Moses; Ajay Kirtane; Manish Parikh; Philip Green; Matthew Finn; Santiago Garcia; Anthony Doing; Mitul Patel; John Bahadorani; Georgios Christopoulos; Aris Karatasakis; Craig A Thompson; Subhash Banerjee; Emmanouil S Brilakis
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.022

7.  Patient radiation exposure during transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures.

Authors:  Benoit Daneault; Stephen Balter; Susheel K Kodali; Mathew R Williams; Philippe Généreux; George R Reiss; Jean-Michel Paradis; Philip Green; Ajay J Kirtane; Craig Smith; Jeffrey W Moses; Martin B Leon
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.534

Review 8.  Reducing radiation in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Antonis N Pavlidis; Daniel A Jones; Alex Sirker; Anthony Mathur; Elliot J Smith
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2016

9.  Novel X-ray image noise reduction technology reduces patient radiation dose while maintaining image quality in coronary angiography.

Authors:  T Ten Cate; M van Wely; H Gehlmann; M Mauti; C Camaro; N Reifart; H Suryapranata; M J de Boer
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  STROBE--Radiation Ulcer: An Overlooked Complication of Fluoroscopic Intervention: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Kai-Che Wei; Kuo-Chung Yang; Guang-Yuan Mar; Lee-Wei Chen; Chieh-Shan Wu; Chi-Cheng Lai; Wen-Hua Wang; Ping-Chin Lai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.