AIMS: To describe patient radiation utilisation during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on a series of consecutive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on radiation exposure were prospectively collected for consecutive patients undergoing TAVR and percutaneous coronary interventions at our centre. Radiation dose during the procedure was recorded using the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reference point (Ka,r) and the dose area product (PKA). In addition to quantifying overall radiation doses during TAVR, radiation exposure during transfemoral (TF) (n=79) and transapical (TA) (n=26) cases was compared. The median radiation dose during TAVR was 1,639 mGy (983-2,420), or 188 (106-321) Gy*cm2. Radiation dose was significantly lower among TA patients using either the reference point (TA: 946 [777-1,261] vs. TF: 1,932 [1,383-2,614] mGy; p<0.001) or the dose area product (TA: 89 [60-115] vs. TF: 236 [164-338] Gy*cm2; p<0.001). Fluoroscopy time was lower for TA patients (TA: 10 [8-11] vs. TF: 30 [24-34] minutes; p<0.001). Operators experience did not affect radiation exposure for TF cases. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation exposure during TAVR appears similar to other percutaneous coronary interventions of moderate complexity. Radiation doses were significantly lower for TA procedures. A higher dose of radiation in TF patients may be related to additional imaging requirements to optimise percutaneous vascular access and closure.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To describe patient radiation utilisation during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) on a series of consecutive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on radiation exposure were prospectively collected for consecutive patients undergoing TAVR and percutaneous coronary interventions at our centre. Radiation dose during the procedure was recorded using the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reference point (Ka,r) and the dose area product (PKA). In addition to quantifying overall radiation doses during TAVR, radiation exposure during transfemoral (TF) (n=79) and transapical (TA) (n=26) cases was compared. The median radiation dose during TAVR was 1,639 mGy (983-2,420), or 188 (106-321) Gy*cm2. Radiation dose was significantly lower among TA patients using either the reference point (TA: 946 [777-1,261] vs. TF: 1,932 [1,383-2,614] mGy; p<0.001) or the dose area product (TA: 89 [60-115] vs. TF: 236 [164-338] Gy*cm2; p<0.001). Fluoroscopy time was lower for TA patients (TA: 10 [8-11] vs. TF: 30 [24-34] minutes; p<0.001). Operators experience did not affect radiation exposure for TF cases. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation exposure during TAVR appears similar to other percutaneous coronary interventions of moderate complexity. Radiation doses were significantly lower for TA procedures. A higher dose of radiation in TF patients may be related to additional imaging requirements to optimise percutaneous vascular access and closure.
Authors: Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; David L Brown; Peter C Block; Robert A Guyton; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Pamela S Douglas; John L Petersen; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart Pocock Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-09-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Rodrigo Bagur; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Daniel Doyle; Robert De Larochellière; Jacques Villeneuve; Jerôme Lemieux; Sébastien Bergeron; Mélanie Côté; Olivier F Bertrand; Philippe Pibarot; Eric Dumont Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-02
Authors: Martyn Thomas; Gerhard Schymik; Thomas Walther; Dominique Himbert; Thierry Lefèvre; Hendrik Treede; Holger Eggebrecht; Paolo Rubino; Iassen Michev; Rüdiger Lange; William N Anderson; Olaf Wendler Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-06-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Charles E Chambers; Kenneth A Fetterly; Ralf Holzer; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; James C Blankenship; Stephen Balter; Warren K Laskey Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: P Signorotto; A del Vecchio; M Montorfano; F Maisano; M Giagnorio; R Bellanca; A Colombo; R Calandrino Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 0.972
Authors: Anna Sonia Petronio; Marco De Carlo; Francesco Bedogni; Antonio Marzocchi; Silvio Klugmann; Francesco Maisano; Angelo Ramondo; Gian Paolo Ussia; Federica Ettori; Arnaldo Poli; Nedy Brambilla; Francesco Saia; Federico De Marco; Antonio Colombo Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Donald L Miller; Stephen Balter; Beth A Schueler; Louis K Wagner; Keith J Strauss; Eliseo Vañó Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Alejandro Aquino; Ali J Khiabani; Matthew C Henn; Alan Zajarias; Spencer J Melby; Marc Sintek; John Lasala; Puja Kachroo; Eric Novak; Hersh S Maniar Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2019-07-06 Impact factor: 4.330