Literature DB >> 21435496

Complications after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Harlan C Amstutz1, Michel J Le Duff, Patricia A Campbell, Lauren E Wisk, Karren M Takamura.   

Abstract

This article determines the incidence and cause of the complications commonly associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants and the proposed methods to prevent these complications. The literature available in PubMed was reviewed. Complication rates after hip resurfacing are low, and the procedure has shown both safety and efficacy in the hands of surgeons trained in specialized centers. Proper surgical technique can further reduce the incidence of femoral neck fracture, component loosening, and abnormal wear of the prosthesis. A more systematic detection of adverse local tissue reactions is needed to provide accurate assessments of their prevalence.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21435496     DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2010.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am        ISSN: 0030-5898            Impact factor:   2.472


  14 in total

Review 1.  Surgical management of hip osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Rajiv Gandhi; Anthony V Perruccio; Nizar N Mahomed
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  High prevalence of adverse reactions to metal debris in small-headed ASR™ hips.

Authors:  Aleksi Reito; Timo Puolakka; Petra Elo; Jorma Pajamäki; Antti Eskelinen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Do revised hip resurfacing arthroplasties lead to outcomes comparable to those of primary and revised total hip arthroplasties?

Authors:  William Desloges; Isabelle Catelas; Toru Nishiwaki; Paul R Kim; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  MRI predicts ALVAL and tissue damage in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Danyal H Nawabi; Stephanie Gold; Steven Lyman; Kara Fields; Douglas E Padgett; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  What causes unexplained pain in patients with metal-on metal hip devices? A retrieval, histologic, and imaging analysis.

Authors:  Danyal H Nawabi; Nader A Nassif; Huong T Do; Kirsten Stoner; Marcella Elpers; Edwin P Su; Timothy Wright; Hollis G Potter; Douglas E Padgett
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Trunnionosis: the latest culprit in adverse reactions to metal debris following hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan M Shulman; Michael G Zywiel; Rajiv Gandhi; J Roderick Davey; David C Salonen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Adoption of hip resurfacing arthroplasty at hospital for special surgery: a cohort study.

Authors:  Edwin P Su; Sherwin L Su
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-05

8.  Groin pain after metal on metal hip resurfacing: mid-term follow-up of a prospective cohort of patients.

Authors:  Emmanuel Illical; Heather Belanger; Paul R Kim; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-09-26

9.  Contact patch to rim distance predicts metal ion levels in hip resurfacing.

Authors:  James P Yoon; Michel J Le Duff; Alicia J Johnson; Karren M Takamura; Edward Ebramzadeh; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Thermal damage during humeral reaming in total shoulder resurfacing.

Authors:  Philip A McCann; Partha P Sarangi; Richard P Baker; Ashley W Blom; Rouin Amirfeyz
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.