Literature DB >> 21431411

Semi-automatic determination of detailed vertebral shape from lumbar radiographs using active appearance models.

M G Roberts1, T Oh, E M B Pacheco, R Mohankumar, T F Cootes, J E Adams.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: The vertebral endplates in lumbar radiographs were located by a semi-automatic annotation method using statistical shape models.
INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fractures are common osteoporotic fractures, but current quantitative detection methods (morphometry) lack specificity. We have previously developed more specific quantitative classifiers of vertebral fracture using shape and appearance models. This method has only been applied to DXA vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) images and not to spinal radiographs. The classifiers require a detailed annotation of the outline of the vertebral endplate, so we investigated the application of similar semi-automated annotation methods to lumbar radiographs as the initial step in the generalisation of the statistical classifiers used in VFA images.
METHODS: The vertebral body outlines in a training set of 670 lumbar radiographs were manually annotated by expert radiologists. This training set was used to build statistical models of vertebral shape and appearance using triplets of vertebrae. In order to segment vertebrae, the models were refitted using a sequence of active appearance models of vertebral triplets, using a miss-40-out train/test cross-validation experiment. The accuracy was evaluated against the manual annotation and analysed by fracture grade.
RESULTS: Good accuracy was obtained for normal vertebrae (0.82 mm) and fracture grades 1 and 2 (1.19 mm), but the localisation accuracy deteriorated for grade 3 fractures to 2.12 mm.
CONCLUSION: Vertebral body shape annotation can be substantially automated on lumbar radiographs. However, an occasional manual correction may be required, typically with either severe fractures, or when there is a high degree of projectional tilting or scoliosis. The located detailed shapes may enable the development of more powerful quantitative classifiers of osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21431411     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1604-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  27 in total

1.  Vertebral morphometry: semiautomatic determination of detailed shape from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images using active appearance models.

Authors:  Martin Roberts; Timothy F Cootes; Judith E Adams
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Prevalent vertebral deformities predict mortality and hospitalization in older women with low bone mass. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group.

Authors:  K E Ensrud; D E Thompson; J A Cauley; M C Nevitt; D M Kado; M C Hochberg; A C Santora; D M Black
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Pierre D Delmas; Lex van de Langerijt; Nelson B Watts; Richard Eastell; Harry Genant; Andreas Grauer; David L Cahall
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-12-06       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 4.  Identification of vertebral fractures: an update.

Authors:  L Ferrar; G Jiang; J Adams; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; C Bigelow; M Heimisdottir; S May; M Walker; J R Kirkwood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Identification of vertebral deformities in women: comparison of radiological assessment and quantitative morphometry using morphometric radiography and morphometric X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  L Ferrar; G Jiang; N A Barrington; R Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Detection of vertebral fractures in DXA VFA images using statistical models of appearance and a semi-automatic segmentation.

Authors:  M G Roberts; E M B Pacheco; R Mohankumar; T F Cootes; J E Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS Study.

Authors:  Claus C Glüer; Richard Eastell; David M Reid; Dieter Felsenberg; Christian Roux; Reinhard Barkmann; Wolfram Timm; Tilo Blenk; Gabi Armbrecht; Alison Stewart; Jackie Clowes; Friederike E Thomasius; Sami Kolta
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  The assessment of vertebral deformity: a method for use in population studies and clinical trials.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; T D Spector; K S Eyres; E D Fern; N O'Rourke; S Vasikaran; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  6 in total

1.  The lumbar spine has an intrinsic shape specific to each individual that remains a characteristic throughout flexion and extension.

Authors:  Anastasia V Pavlova; Judith R Meakin; Kay Cooper; Rebecca J Barr; Richard M Aspden
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Quantitative vertebral morphometry based on parametric modeling of vertebral bodies in 3D.

Authors:  D Stern; V Njagulj; B Likar; F Pernuš; T Vrtovec
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Review of radiological scoring methods of osteoporotic vertebral fractures for clinical and research settings.

Authors:  Ling Oei; Fernando Rivadeneira; Felisia Ly; Stephan J Breda; M Carola Zillikens; Albert Hofman; André G Uitterlinden; Gabriel P Krestin; Edwin H G Oei
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Automatic detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in routine thoracic and abdominal MDCT.

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Jan S Bauer; Tobias Klinder; Martin Dobritz; Ernst J Rummeny; Peter B Noël; Cristian Lorenz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Diagnosis of vertebral fractures in children: is a simplified algorithm-based qualitative technique reliable?

Authors:  E Adiotomre; L Summers; A Allison; S J Walters; M Digby; P Broadley; I Lang; A C Offiah
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-02-22

Review 6.  Opportunistic diagnosis of osteoporosis, fragile bone strength and vertebral fractures from routine CT scans; a review of approved technology systems and pathways to implementation.

Authors:  Veena Aggarwal; Christina Maslen; Richard L Abel; Pinaki Bhattacharya; Paul A Bromiley; Emma M Clark; Juliet E Compston; Nicola Crabtree; Jennifer S Gregory; Eleni P Kariki; Nicholas C Harvey; Kate A Ward; Kenneth E S Poole
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 5.346

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.