Literature DB >> 22825483

Quantitative vertebral morphometry based on parametric modeling of vertebral bodies in 3D.

D Stern1, V Njagulj, B Likar, F Pernuš, T Vrtovec.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Quantitative vertebral morphometry (QVM) was performed by parametric modeling of vertebral bodies in three dimensions (3D).
INTRODUCTION: Identification of vertebral fractures in two dimensions is a challenging task due to the projective nature of radiographic images and variability in the vertebral shape. By generating detailed 3D anatomical images, computed tomography (CT) enables accurate measurement of vertebral deformations and fractures.
METHODS: A detailed 3D representation of the vertebral body shape is obtained by automatically aligning a parametric 3D model to vertebral bodies in CT images. The parameters of the 3D model describe clinically meaningful morphometric vertebral body features, and QVM in 3D is performed by comparing the parameters to their statistical values. Thresholds and parameters that best discriminate between normal and fractured vertebral bodies are determined by applying statistical classification analysis.
RESULTS: The proposed QVM in 3D was applied to 454 normal and 228 fractured vertebral bodies, yielding classification sensitivity of 92.5% at 7.5% specificity, with corresponding accuracy of 92.5% and precision of 86.1%. The 3D shape parameters that provided the best separation between normal and fractured vertebral bodies were the vertebral body height and the inclination and concavity of both vertebral endplates.
CONCLUSION: The described QVM in 3D is able to efficiently and objectively discriminate between normal and fractured vertebral bodies and identify morphological cases (wedge, (bi)concavity, or crush) and grades (1, 2, or 3) of vertebral body fractures. It may be therefore valuable for diagnosing and predicting vertebral fractures in patients who are at risk of osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22825483     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2089-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  35 in total

1.  Vertebral morphometry: semiautomatic determination of detailed shape from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry images using active appearance models.

Authors:  Martin Roberts; Timothy F Cootes; Judith E Adams
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.016

2.  Reproducibility of a semi-automatic method for 6-point vertebral morphometry in a multi-centre trial.

Authors:  Giuseppe Guglielmi; Luca Pio Stoppino; Maria Grazia Placentino; Francesco D'Errico; Francesco Palmieri
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Can you diagnose for vertebral fracture correctly by plain X-ray?

Authors:  Z Ito; A Harada; Y Matsui; M Takemura; N Wakao; T Suzuki; T Nihashi; S Kawatsu; H Shimokata; N Ishiguro
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  Identification of vertebral fractures: an update.

Authors:  L Ferrar; G Jiang; J Adams; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Human lumbar vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy.

Authors:  M M Panjabi; V Goel; T Oxland; K Takata; J Duranceau; M Krag; M Price
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; C Bigelow; M Heimisdottir; S May; M Walker; J R Kirkwood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Detection of vertebral fractures in DXA VFA images using statistical models of appearance and a semi-automatic segmentation.

Authors:  M G Roberts; E M B Pacheco; R Mohankumar; T F Cootes; J E Adams
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Algorithm-based qualitative and semiquantitative identification of prevalent vertebral fracture: agreement between different readers, imaging modalities, and diagnostic approaches.

Authors:  Lynne Ferrar; Guirong Jiang; John T Schousboe; Charles R DeBold; Richard Eastell
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas; L Palermo; M Nevitt; R S Valentin; D Black; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  1 in total

1.  A deep learning framework for vertebral morphometry and Cobb angle measurement with external validation.

Authors:  Danis Alukaev; Semen Kiselev; Tamerlan Mustafaev; Ahatov Ainur; Bulat Ibragimov; Tomaž Vrtovec
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 2.721

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.