Literature DB >> 21424872

Ballistic thoracoabdominal injury: analysis of recent military experience in afghanistan.

J J Morrison1, M J Midwinter, J O Jansen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Military surgery has seen the arrival of the critical care provision and cross-sectional imaging enjoyed by civilian trauma surgeons. Ballistic injury to the thoracoabdominal region is uncommon but potentially devastating. The aim of this study was to analyze recent military experience of managing this injury complex.
METHODS: The study is a retrospective analysis of patients, admitted over a 12-month period, to the British Military Hospital in Afghanistan with ballistic thoracoabdominal injuries.
RESULTS: In total, 27 patients sustained combined thoracoabdominal injury with a mean new injury severity score of 29±12, revised trauma score of 5.94±2.93 and predicted survival of 71.1%±39.1%. In all, 20 (74%) patients underwent immediate operation, and 7 (26%) were initially managed nonoperatively. Of those requiring surgery, 11 required laparotomy and tube thoracostomy, and 9 required thoraco-laparotomy. Of the seven casualties who were initially observed and/or further investigated, two required laparotomy following computed tomography scanning, and five were managed conservatively, two of whom required delayed surgery. There were nine fatalities, all within 16 days of being wounded. Four patients died from exsanguination, one from a traumatic brain injury, and four from multiorgan failure. Five patients presented with cardiac arrest, two of whom survived.
CONCLUSIONS: Exploration remains the default treatment. Resuscitative thoracotomy may yield unexpected survivors, even if subsequent laparotomy is required. Nonoperative management appears to be feasible in a small proportion of patients but requires careful selection supported by cross-sectional imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21424872     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1046-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  20 in total

1.  Selective nonoperative management in 1,856 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds: should routine laparotomy still be the standard of care?

Authors:  G C Velmahos; D Demetriades; K G Toutouzas; G Sarkisyan; L S Chan; R Ishak; K Alo; P Vassiliu; J A Murray; A Salim; J Asensio; H Belzberg; N Katkhouda; T V Berne
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The operative management of thoracic and thoracoabdominal wounds in the combat zone in Korea.

Authors:  J F DICKSON; H R HORNBERGER
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1961-03       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Selective conservative management of abdominal gunshot wounds: a prospective study.

Authors:  D J Muckart; A T Abdool-Carrim; B King
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Selective nonoperative management of penetrating torso injury from combat fragmentation wounds.

Authors:  Alec C Beekley; Lorne H Blackbourne; James A Sebesta; Neil McMullin; Philip S Mullenix; John B Holcomb
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-02

5.  Thoracic injuries in combat casualties in Vietnam.

Authors:  J J McNamara; J K Messersmith; R A Dunn; M D Molot; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  Practice management guidelines for selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma.

Authors:  John J Como; Faran Bokhari; William C Chiu; Therese M Duane; Michele R Holevar; Margaret A Tandoh; Rao R Ivatury; Thomas M Scalea
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-03

7.  Penetrating left thoracoabdominal trauma: the incidence and clinical presentation of diaphragm injuries.

Authors:  J A Murray; D Demetriades; E E Cornwell; J A Asensio; G Velmahos; H Belzberg; T V Berne
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1997-10

8.  Penetrating thoracoabdominal injuries: ongoing dilemma-which cavity and when?

Authors:  Juan A Asensio; Hector Arroyo; William Veloz; Walter Forno; Esteban Gambaro; Gustavo A Roldan; James Murray; George Velmahos; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Cardiovascular and thoracic battle injuries in the Lebanon War. Analysis of 3,000 personal cases.

Authors:  A T Zakharia
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Complications of negative laparotomy for truncal stab wounds.

Authors:  A Leppäniemi; J Salo; R Haapiainen
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1995-01
View more
  3 in total

1.  Survivorship bias after military thoracic injuries.

Authors:  Calvin S H Ng; Anthony M H Ho; Malcolm J Underwood; Tim R Graham
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy performed in European civilian trauma patients with blunt or penetrating injuries: a systematic review.

Authors:  J K Narvestad; M Meskinfamfard; K Søreide
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Chinese expert consensus on echelons treatment of thoracic injury in modern warfare.

Authors:  Zhao-Wen Zong; Zhi-Nong Wang; Si-Xu Chen; Hao Qin; Lian-Yang Zhang; Yue Shen; Lei Yang; Wen-Qiong Du; Can Chen; Xin Zhong; Lin Zhang; Jiang-Tao Huo; Li-Ping Kuai; Li-Xin Shu; Guo-Fu Du; Yu-Feng Zhao
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2018-10-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.