Literature DB >> 11524592

Selective nonoperative management in 1,856 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds: should routine laparotomy still be the standard of care?

G C Velmahos1, D Demetriades, K G Toutouzas, G Sarkisyan, L S Chan, R Ishak, K Alo, P Vassiliu, J A Murray, A Salim, J Asensio, H Belzberg, N Katkhouda, T V Berne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of a policy of selective nonoperative management (SNOM) in patients with abdominal gunshot wounds. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Selective nonoperative management is practiced extensively in stab wounds and blunt abdominal trauma, but routine laparotomy is still the standard of care in abdominal gunshot wounds.
METHODS: The authors reviewed the medical records of 1,856 patients with abdominal gunshot wounds (1,405 anterior, 451 posterior) admitted during an 8-year period in a busy academic level 1 trauma center and managed by SNOM. According to this policy, patients who did not have peritonitis, were hemodynamically stable, and had a reliable clinical examination were observed.
RESULTS: Initially, 792 (42%) patients (34% of patients with anterior and 68% with posterior abdominal gunshot wounds) were selected for nonoperative management. During observation 80 (4%) patients developed symptoms and required a delayed laparotomy, which revealed organ injuries requiring repair in 57. Five (0.3%) patients suffered complications potentially related to the delay in laparotomy, which were managed successfully. Seven hundred twelve (38%) patients were successfully managed without an operation. The rate of unnecessary laparotomy was 14% among operated patients (or 9% among all patients). If patients were managed by routine laparotomy, the unnecessary laparotomy rate would have been 47% (39% for anterior and 74% for posterior abdominal gunshot wounds). Compared with patients with unnecessary laparotomy, patients managed without surgery had significantly shorter hospital stays and lower hospital charges. By maintaining a policy of SNOM instead of routine laparotomy, a total of 3,560 hospital days and $9,555,752 in hospital charges were saved over the period of the study.
CONCLUSION: Selective nonoperative management is a safe method for managing patients with abdominal gunshot wounds in a level 1 trauma center with an in-house trauma team. It reduces significantly the rate of unnecessary laparotomy and hospital charges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11524592      PMCID: PMC1422030          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200109000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  31 in total

1.  Gunshot wound of the abdomen: role of selective conservative management.

Authors:  D Demetriades; D Charalambides; M Lakhoo; D Pantanowitz
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Selective conservative management of abdominal gunshot wounds: a prospective study.

Authors:  D J Muckart; A T Abdool-Carrim; B King
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  The management of penetrating injuries of the back. A prospective study of 230 patients.

Authors:  D Demetriades; B Rabinowitz; C Sofianos; D Charalambides; J Melissas; C Hatzitheofilou; J Da Silva
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Mandatory laparotomy for gunshot wounds penetrating the abdomen.

Authors:  E E Moore; J B Moore; S Van Duzer-Moore; J S Thompson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Penetrating injuries to the subclavian and axillary vessels.

Authors:  D Demetriades; S Chahwan; H Gomez; R Peng; G Velmahos; J Murray; J Asensio; F Bongard
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  A prospective analysis of diagnostic laparoscopy in trauma.

Authors:  T C Fabian; M A Croce; R M Stewart; F E Pritchard; G Minard; K A Kudsk
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Indications for operation in abdominal stab wounds. A prospective study of 651 patients.

Authors:  D Demetriades; B Rabinowitz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Peritoneal lavage. Its unreliability in gunshot wounds of the lower chest and abdomen.

Authors:  E R Thal; R A May; D Beesinger
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1980-04

9.  Complications of negative laparotomy for trauma.

Authors:  J A Weigelt; R G Kingman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Penetrating trauma to the back and flank. A reassessment of mandatory celiotomy.

Authors:  J Vanderzee; P Christenberry; G J Jurkovich
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  39 in total

1.  Role of Selective Management of Penetrating Injuries in Mass Casualty Incidents.

Authors:  Peep Talving; Joseph DuBose; Galinos Barmparas; Kenji Inaba; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.693

2.  Conservative management of abdominal injuries.

Authors:  Ahmet Okuş; Barış Sevinç; Serden Ay; Kemal Arslan; Ömer Karahan; Mehmet Ali Eryılmaz
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2013-12-01

3.  Ballistic thoracoabdominal injury: analysis of recent military experience in afghanistan.

Authors:  J J Morrison; M J Midwinter; J O Jansen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Current management of penetrating torso trauma: nontherapeutic is not good enough anymore.

Authors:  Chad G Ball
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries.

Authors:  Demetrios Demetriades; Pantelis Hadjizacharia; Costas Constantinou; Carlos Brown; Kenji Inaba; Peter Rhee; Ali Salim
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Abdominal gunshot wounds: multi-detector-row CT findings compared with laparotomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Ernesto Lima Araujo Melo; Marcos Roberto de Menezes; Giovanni Guido Cerri
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2011-12-02

Review 7.  [Surgical management of abdominal injury].

Authors:  G Matthes; K Bauwens; A Ekkernkamp; D Stengel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Experiences of Conflict Zone-Related Ballistic Renal Injury.

Authors:  Huseyin Taş; Rahman Şenocak; Şahin Kaymak; Emin Lapsekili
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 9.  Damage control surgical management of combined small and large bowel injuries in penetrating trauma: Are ostomies still pertinent?

Authors:  Carlos A Ordoñez; Michael W Parra; Yaset Caicedo; Natalia Padilla; Edison Angamarca; José Julián Serna; Fernando Rodríguez-Holguín; Alberto García; Alexander Salcedo; Luis Fernando Pino; Adolfo González-Hadad; Mario Alain Herrera; Laureano Quintero; Fabian Hernández; María Josefa Franco; Gonzalo Aristizábal; Luis Eduardo Toro; Mónica Guzmán-Rodríguez; Federico Coccolini; Ricardo Ferrada; Rao Ivatury
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2021-04-27

10.  Abdominal Trauma in Combat.

Authors:  K J Singh; A Galagali
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.