Literature DB >> 7745660

Complications of negative laparotomy for truncal stab wounds.

A Leppäniemi1, J Salo, R Haapiainen.   

Abstract

In a retrospective study of 459 patients undergoing mandatory explorative laparotomy for truncal stab wounds, 172 (37%) negative laparotomies were identified, divided in two groups: group I (n = 147) without, and group II (n = 25) with associated extra-abdominal injuries or surgical procedures other than laparotomy. One patient (0.6%) died of associated mediastinal vascular injuries. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 21%, 17% in group I, and 44% in group II (p < 0.001). The excess morbidity in group II was caused by pulmonary complications associated with a thoracic injury or procedure. In group I, the complications were not severe, prolonging the mean hospital stay by 4.6 days. It is concluded that mandatory laparotomy for truncal stab wounds leads to an unnecessary operation in about 40% of cases, with a 20% morbidity rate associated with the laparotomy itself. Although the complications are not severe, the results should be assessed against the safety and accuracy of the selective management of abdominal stab wounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7745660     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199501000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  20 in total

1.  Unnecessary laparotomy by using physical examination and different diagnostic modalities for penetrating abdominal stab wounds.

Authors:  C Ertekin; H Yanar; K Taviloglu; R Güloglu; O Alimoglu
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal trauma at a level 1 Canadian trauma centre: a quest for perfection

Authors:  Rogeh Habashi; Angela Coates; Paul T. Engels
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Ballistic thoracoabdominal injury: analysis of recent military experience in afghanistan.

Authors:  J J Morrison; M J Midwinter; J O Jansen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Management guidelines for penetrating abdominal trauma.

Authors:  Walter L Biffl; Ari Leppaniemi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Current management of penetrating torso trauma: nontherapeutic is not good enough anymore.

Authors:  Chad G Ball
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Self-inflicted injuries are an important cause of penetrating traumatic injuries in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshimitsu Izawa; Masayuki Suzukawa; Alan K Lefor
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2016-03-28

7.  Management of penetrating abdominal trauma in the conflict environment: the role of computed tomography scanning.

Authors:  Jonathan J Morrison; Jon C Clasper; Iain Gibb; Mark Midwinter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Conservative versus operative management in stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma: the experience of a Canadian level 1 trauma centre.

Authors:  Sean Bennett; Aysah Amath; Heather Knight; Jacinthe Lampron
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Analysis of 120 patients with abdominal stab wound focusing on diagnostic role of fast.

Authors:  Mehmet Kamil Yıldız; Erkan Ozkan; Hacı Mehmet Odabaşı; Cengiz Eriş; Emre Günay; Hacı Hasan Abuoğlu; Bulent Kaya; Samet Yardımcı; Ma Tolga Müftüoglu; Umit Topaloglu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-05-15

10.  Abdominal trauma in durban, South Africa: factors influencing outcome.

Authors:  M N Mnguni; D J J Muckart; T E Madiba
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.