| Literature DB >> 21423648 |
Claude-Edouard C Michel1, Katrina G Roper, Magda A Divena, Helen H Lee, Hugh R Taylor.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trachoma is the leading infectious cause of blindness due to conjunctival infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. The presence of active trachoma and evidence of infection are poorly correlated and a strong immunologically-mediated inflammatory response means that clinical signs last much longer than infection. This population-based study in five Aboriginal communities endemic for trachoma in northern Australia compared a fine grading of clinical trachoma with diagnostic positivity and organism load.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21423648 PMCID: PMC3057949 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Detailed grading scheme for clinical assessment of trachoma.
| Grading | Definition of the finer grading |
|
| |
| TF0 | No visible follicles in the upper tarsal conjunctiva |
| TF1 | One or two small follicles in the upper tarsal conjunctiva |
| TF2 | More than two but less than 5 follicles of 0.5 mm in diameter in the upper tarsal conjunctiva |
| TF3 | Five or more follicles of 0.5 mm in diameter in the upper tarsal conjunctiva and equivalent to WHO simplified grading of TF |
| TF4 | Extensive large follicles of 0.5 mm in diameter in the upper tarsal conjunctiva |
|
| |
| TI0 | No visible inflammation of the tarsal conjunctiva |
| TI1 | Mild inflammation of the tarsal conjunctiva without obstruction of the vessels |
| TI2 | Moderate inflammation of the tarsal conjunctiva with less than half of the deep tarsal vessels being obscured |
| TI3 | Pronounced inflammatory thickening of the tarsal conjunctiva that obscures more than half of the normal deep tarsal vessels and equivalent to WHO simplified grading of TI |
| TI4 | Very pronounced inflammation of the tarsal conjunctiva |
|
| |
| TS0 | No visible scarring of the tarsal conjunctiva |
| TS1 | Small amount of early scarring apparent, but not clearly visible |
| TS2 | Moderate amount of early scarring apparent, but not clearly visible |
| TS3 | Presence of clearly visible scarring apparent in the upper tarsal conjunctiva and equivalent to WHO simplified grading of TS |
| TS4 | Extensive clearly visible scarring involving most of the tarsal conjunctiva |
Figure 1Recruitment algorithm for participants in five Aboriginal communities.
Clinical signs of active trachoma compared with the presence of C. trachomatis.
| Clinical signs of active trachoma (TF
and TI) in the left eye compared with the presence of | |||||||
| Clinical sign | PCR Positive
( | POC Positive
( | Total | ||||
| and photograding |
| % | 95% CI |
| % | 95% CI | ( |
|
| 6 | 0.8 | 0.3–1.7 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0–0.4 | 793 |
|
| 16 | 6.2 | 3.8–9.9 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.0–3.0 | 257 |
|
| 5 | 4.0 | 1.5–9.3 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.0–4.9 | 124 |
|
| 16 | 16.3 | 10.2–25.0 | 9 | 9.2 | 4.7–16.7 | 98 |
|
| 3 | 30.0 | 10.3–60.8 | 2 | 20.0 | 4.6–52.1 | 10 |
|
| 27 | 2.3 | 1.6–3.3 | 3 | 0.3 | 0.1–0.8 | 1,174 |
|
| 19 | 17.6 | 11.5–25.9 | 11 | 10.2 | 5.6–17.5 | 108 |
|
| 6 | 66.7 | 35.1–88.3 | 3 | 33.3 | 11.7–64.9 | 9 |
|
| 1 | 50.0 | 9.5–90.6 | 1 | 50.0 | 9.5–90.6 | 2 |
|
| 20 | 18.2 | 12.0–26.5 | 12 | 10.9 | 6.2–18.3 | 110 |
.
.
Figure 2Age distribution of PCR-positive subjects (n = 46/1282).
Figure 3Distribution of the organism load1 in first and second swabs showing the geometric mean2.
Figure 4Age-specific prevalence of the left eye fine grading of TF and PCR positivity.
Fig. 4A: Sign of TF1; Fig. 4B: Sign of TF2; Fig. 4C: Sign of TF3; Fig. 4D: Sign of TF4.
Figure 5Organism load versus fine left eye clinical grading.
Fig. 5A: TF0–4 vs. load1; Fig. 5B: TI0–4 in presence of TFWHO vs. load2; Fig. 5C: TI0–4 in absence of TFWHO vs. load3.