PURPOSE: To describe the relationship between the clinical exam for trachoma and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for ocular chlamydia. METHODS: One hundred children in a trachoma-endemic area of Ethiopia were examined three times and swabbed twice for PCR analysis. The assays were compared, and an analysis of the variance between exam and PCR was performed. RESULTS: Inter-examiner agreement was 0.57 (Cohen's kappa), inter-PCR agreement 0.98, and agreement between examiner and PCR, 0.26-0.34. The positive predictive value of the exam in identifying infection was 66%. Inter-examiner variance accounted for 30% of the total variance between the exam and PCR, with the remainder presumably due to an underlying difference in what the exam and PCR measure. CONCLUSIONS: Despite modest inter-grader reliability and correlation with evidence of infection, the clinical exam is widely used due to its convenience and low cost. Efforts to make laboratory tests for ocular Chlamydia trachomatis more affordable would be useful.
PURPOSE: To describe the relationship between the clinical exam for trachoma and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for ocular chlamydia. METHODS: One hundred children in a trachoma-endemic area of Ethiopia were examined three times and swabbed twice for PCR analysis. The assays were compared, and an analysis of the variance between exam and PCR was performed. RESULTS: Inter-examiner agreement was 0.57 (Cohen's kappa), inter-PCR agreement 0.98, and agreement between examiner and PCR, 0.26-0.34. The positive predictive value of the exam in identifying infection was 66%. Inter-examiner variance accounted for 30% of the total variance between the exam and PCR, with the remainder presumably due to an underlying difference in what the exam and PCR measure. CONCLUSIONS: Despite modest inter-grader reliability and correlation with evidence of infection, the clinical exam is widely used due to its convenience and low cost. Efforts to make laboratory tests for ocular Chlamydia trachomatis more affordable would be useful.
Authors: Emma M Harding-Esch; Tansy Edwards; Ansumana Sillah; Isatou Sarr; Chrissy H Roberts; Paul Snell; Esther Aryee; Sandra Molina; Martin J Holland; David C W Mabey; Robin L Bailey Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2009-12-22
Authors: Jeremy D Keenan; Takele Lakew; Wondu Alemayehu; Muluken Melese; Travis C Porco; Elizabeth Yi; Jenafir I House; Zhaoxia Zhou; Kathryn J Ray; Nisha R Acharya; John P Whitcher; Bruce D Gaynor; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Craig W See; Wondu Alemayehu; Muluken Melese; Zhaoxia Zhou; Travis C Porco; Stephen Shiboski; Bruce D Gaynor; John Eng; Jeremy D Keenan; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Daniel P Morberg; Wondu Alemayehu; Muluken Melese; Takele Lakew; Alemayehu Sisay; Zhaoxia Zhou; Vicky Cevallos; Catherine E Oldenburg; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman; Jeremy D Keenan Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 1.648
Authors: Artemis Koukounari; Irini Moustaki; Nicholas C Grassly; Isobel M Blake; María-Gloria Basáñez; Manoj Gambhir; David C W Mabey; Robin L Bailey; Matthew J Burton; Anthony W Solomon; Christl A Donnelly Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Satasuk Joy Bhosai; Abdou Amza; Nassirou Beido; Robin L Bailey; Jeremy David Keenan; Bruce D Gaynor; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2012-07-14 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Emma M Harding-Esch; Ansumana Sillah; Tansy Edwards; Sarah E Burr; John D Hart; Hassan Joof; Mass Laye; Pateh Makalo; Ahmed Manjang; Sandra Molina; Isatou Sarr-Sissoho; Thomas C Quinn; Tom Lietman; Martin J Holland; David Mabey; Sheila K West; Robin Bailey Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2013-06-13