K G Roper1, H R Taylor. 1. National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of the study was to determine the rates of trachoma in Aboriginal communities and to compare clinical assessment with photographic assessment for the presence of signs of trachoma. METHODS: Five Aboriginal communities in the Katherine region of the Northern Territory, Australia, were assessed for the presence of trachoma. Trachoma was diagnosed by clinical eye examination using a fine grading based on the World Health Organization (WHO) simplified grading system. Photographs were taken of the left eye of every person and graded using the fine grading system. The clinical assessment was compared with the photographic assessment for each person using the fine grading system. RESULTS: A total of 1316 people out of 1545 (85.2%) were screened for trachoma from five communities, with 1254 photographs being compared with clinical assessment scores. The overall prevalence of active trachoma was greater than 10% across the five communities, and greater than 20% in two communities. CONCLUSION: Active trachoma in young people and scarring in older people remain as problems in Aboriginal communities. Photographic assessment is a useful technique, but in comparison with clinical assessment it can result in overestimation of scoring for trachoma for inflammation.
AIMS: The aim of the study was to determine the rates of trachoma in Aboriginal communities and to compare clinical assessment with photographic assessment for the presence of signs of trachoma. METHODS: Five Aboriginal communities in the Katherine region of the Northern Territory, Australia, were assessed for the presence of trachoma. Trachoma was diagnosed by clinical eye examination using a fine grading based on the World Health Organization (WHO) simplified grading system. Photographs were taken of the left eye of every person and graded using the fine grading system. The clinical assessment was compared with the photographic assessment for each person using the fine grading system. RESULTS: A total of 1316 people out of 1545 (85.2%) were screened for trachoma from five communities, with 1254 photographs being compared with clinical assessment scores. The overall prevalence of active trachoma was greater than 10% across the five communities, and greater than 20% in two communities. CONCLUSION:Active trachoma in young people and scarring in older people remain as problems in Aboriginal communities. Photographic assessment is a useful technique, but in comparison with clinical assessment it can result in overestimation of scoring for trachoma for inflammation.
Authors: Sintayehu Gebresillasie; Zerihun Tadesse; Ayalew Shiferaw; Sun N Yu; Nicole E Stoller; Zhaoxia Zhou; Paul M Emerson; Bruce D Gaynor; Thomas M Lietman; Jeremy D Keenan Journal: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Date: 2015 Impact factor: 1.648
Authors: Bruce D Gaynor; Abdou Amza; Sintayehu Gebresailassie; Boubacar Kadri; Baido Nassirou; Nicole E Stoller; Sun N Yu; Puja A Cuddapah; Jeremy D Keenan; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2014-07-07 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Matthew C Kim; Kazunori Okada; Alexander M Ryner; Abdou Amza; Zerihun Tadesse; Sun Y Cotter; Bruce D Gaynor; Jeremy D Keenan; Thomas M Lietman; Travis C Porco Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-02-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dionna M Wittberg; Solomon Aragie; Wondyifraw Tadesse; Jason S Melo; Kristen Aiemjoy; Melsew Chanyalew; Paul M Emerson; Matthew C Freeman; Scott D Nash; E Kelly Callahan; Zerihun Tadesse; Mulat Zerihun; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman; Jeremy D Keenan Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 2.692