Literature DB >> 21417545

Let the force be with us: dyads exploit haptic coupling for coordination.

Robrecht P R D van der Wel1, Guenther Knoblich, Natalie Sebanz.   

Abstract

People often perform actions that involve a direct physical coupling with another person, such as when moving furniture together. Here, we examined how people successfully coordinate such actions with others. We tested the hypothesis that dyads amplify their forces to create haptic information to coordinate. Participants moved a pole (resembling a pendulum) back and forth between two targets at different amplitudes and frequencies. They did so by pulling on cords attached to the base of the pole, one on each side. In the individual condition, one participant performed this task bimanually, and in the joint condition two participants each controlled one cord. We measured the moment-to-moment pulling forces on each cord and the pole kinematics to determine how well individuals and dyads performed. Results indicated that dyads produced much more overlapping forces than individuals, especially for tasks with higher coordination requirements. Thus, the results suggest that dyads amplify their forces to generate a haptic information channel. This likely reflects a general coordination principle in haptic joint action, where force amplification allows dyads to perform at the same level as individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21417545     DOI: 10.1037/a0022337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  42 in total

1.  Information flow between interacting human brains: Identification, validation, and relationship to social expertise.

Authors:  Edda Bilek; Matthias Ruf; Axel Schäfer; Ceren Akdeniz; Vince D Calhoun; Christian Schmahl; Charmaine Demanuele; Heike Tost; Peter Kirsch; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Vision adds to haptics when dyads perform a whole-body joint balance task.

Authors:  Eric Eils; Rouwen Cañal-Bruland; Leonie Sieverding; Marc H E de Lussanet; Karen Zentgraf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Self-organized complementary joint action: Behavioral dynamics of an interpersonal collision-avoidance task.

Authors:  Michael J Richardson; Steven J Harrison; Rachel W Kallen; Ashley Walton; Brian A Eiler; Elliot Saltzman; R C Schmidt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Force-stabilizing synergies in motor tasks involving two actors.

Authors:  Stanislaw Solnik; Sasha Reschechtko; Yen-Hsun Wu; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Complexity matching and coordination in individual and dyadic performance.

Authors:  Daniel S Schloesser; Christopher T Kello; Vivien Marmelat
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Force asymmetry deteriorates complementary force production during joint action.

Authors:  Junya Masumoto; Nobuyuki Inui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  What should I do next? Using shared representations to solve interaction problems.

Authors:  Giovanni Pezzulo; Haris Dindo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention.

Authors:  Dovin Kiernan; Matthew Ray; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-10

9.  Visual influences on postural and manual interpersonal coordination during a joint precision task.

Authors:  Dilip N Athreya; Michael A Riley; Tehran J Davis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Entrainment and task co-representation effects for discrete and continuous action sequences.

Authors:  Robrecht P R D van der Wel; En Fu
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.