Literature DB >> 21415199

AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: physics of flat-panel fluoroscopy systems: Survey of modern fluoroscopy imaging: flat-panel detectors versus image intensifiers and more.

Edward Lee Nickoloff1.   

Abstract

This article reviews the design and operation of both flat-panel detector (FPD) and image intensifier fluoroscopy systems. The different components of each imaging chain and their functions are explained and compared. FPD systems have multiple advantages such as a smaller size, extended dynamic range, no spatial distortion, and greater stability. However, FPD systems typically have the same spatial resolution for all fields of view (FOVs) and are prone to ghosting. Image intensifier systems have better spatial resolution with the use of smaller FOVs (magnification modes) and tend to be less expensive. However, the spatial resolution of image intensifier systems is limited by the television system to which they are coupled. Moreover, image intensifier systems are degraded by glare, vignetting, spatial distortions, and defocusing effects. FPD systems do not have these problems. Some recent innovations to fluoroscopy systems include automated filtration, pulsed fluoroscopy, automatic positioning, dose-area product meters, and improved automatic dose rate control programs. Operator-selectable features may affect both the patient radiation dose and image quality; these selectable features include dose level setting, the FOV employed, fluoroscopic pulse rates, geometric factors, display software settings, and methods to reduce the imaging time. © RSNA, 2011.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21415199     DOI: 10.1148/rg.312105185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  10 in total

1.  Comparison between radiation exposure levels using an image intensifier and a flat-panel detector-based system in image-guided central venous catheter placement in children weighing less than 10 kg.

Authors:  Roberto Miraglia; Luigi Maruzzelli; Kelvin Cortis; Marcello Piazza; Roberta Gerasia; Simona Maggio; Fabio Tuzzolino; Angelo Luca
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-09-10

Review 2.  New approaches to reduce radiation exposure.

Authors:  Kevin D Hill; Andrew J Einstein
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.677

3.  High-Definition Zoom Mode: A High Resolution X-ray Microscope for Neurointerventional Treatment Procedures.

Authors:  Swetadri Vasan Setlur Nagesh; Kunal Vakharia; Muhammad Waqas; Vernard S Fennell; Gursant S Atwal; Hussain Shallwani; Daniel R Bednarek; Jason M Davies; Kenneth V Snyder; Maxim Mokin; Stephen Rudin; Elad I Levy; Adnan H Siddiqui
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  The use of digital magnification to reduce radiation dose in the cardiac catheter laboratory.

Authors:  Shailesh Dalvi; Hywel Mortimer Roberts; Christopher Bellamy; Michael Rees
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Dose reduction for fluoroscopically guided injections: phantom simulation and patient procedures.

Authors:  C Y Chang; F J Simeone; M C DeLorenzo; W E Palmer; M A Bredella; A J Huang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  A Tutorial on Diagnostic Benefit and Radiation Risk in Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Studies.

Authors:  Harry R Ingleby; Heather S Bonilha; Catriona M Steele
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 7.  History and Evolution of the Barium Swallow for Evaluation of the Pharynx and Esophagus.

Authors:  Marc S Levine; Stephen E Rubesin
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.733

8.  Methodology for Measurement of in vivo Tibiotalar Kinematics After Total Ankle Replacement Using Dual Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Dylan J Blair; Alexej Barg; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson; Amy L Lenz
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-05-05

9.  Influence of safety glasses, body height and magnification on the occupational eye lens dose during pelvic vascular interventions: a phantom study.

Authors:  Alexander Gangl; Hannes Alexander Deutschmann; Rupert Horst Portugaller; Georg Stücklschweiger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  The difference in dose and image quality between magnification methods used after the introduction of larger 60-inch operator screens.

Authors:  Hywel Mortimer-Roberts; Michael R Rees
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2020-04-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.