Literature DB >> 21414704

From "our world" to the "real world": Exploring the views and behaviour of policy-influential Australian public health researchers.

Abby S Haynes1, Gjemma E Derrick, Simon Chapman, Sally Redman, Wayne D Hall, James Gillespie, Heidi Sturk.   

Abstract

Research and researchers influence the genesis and development of public health policy in limited but essential ways. Surveys and interviews with 36 peer-nominated "highly influential" Australian public health researchers found they engaged in a breadth of strategies that included rigorous but targeted research design, multilateral collaboration, multiple methods of research dissemination and promotion (including tactical use of the media), and purposeful development of bridging relationships. Researchers' ability to understand the worlds of research, policy and the media and to speak their languages (or to work with others who fulfilled this role) was a key factor. Advocacy was seen as fundamental by some but was disparaged by others. Influential behaviours were guided by values and beliefs about the principles underlying traditional science and the contrasting ethos of contemporary research. This study may help researchers consider their own policy-related roles, strategies and relationships in the context of increasing calls for research that serves economic and/or social goals.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21414704     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  19 in total

1.  Galvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: the many ways that policymakers use public health researchers.

Authors:  Abby S Haynes; James A Gillespie; Gemma E Derrick; Wayne D Hall; Sally Redman; Simon Chapman; Heidi Sturk
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  The role of public health advocacy in achieving an outright ban on commercial tanning beds in Australia.

Authors:  Craig A Sinclair; Jennifer Kay Makin; Anita Tang; Irena Brozek; Vanessa Rock
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  How contexts and issues influence the use of policy-relevant research syntheses: a critical interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Kaelan A Moat; John N Lavis; Julia Abelson
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Translating active living research into policy and practice: one important pathway to chronic disease prevention.

Authors:  Billie Giles-Corti; James F Sallis; Takemi Sugiyama; Lawrence D Frank; Melanie Lowe; Neville Owen
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.222

Review 5.  Open science at the science-policy interface: bringing in the evidence?

Authors:  Stefan Reichmann; Bernhard Wieser
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-06-20

6.  The association between four citation metrics and peer rankings of research influence of Australian researchers in six fields of public health.

Authors:  Gemma Elizabeth Derrick; Abby Haynes; Simon Chapman; Wayne D Hall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Identifying trustworthy experts: how do policymakers find and assess public health researchers worth consulting or collaborating with?

Authors:  Abby S Haynes; Gemma E Derrick; Sally Redman; Wayne D Hall; James A Gillespie; Simon Chapman; Heidi Sturk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A mixed methods study of the factors that influence whether intervention research has policy and practice impacts: perceptions of Australian researchers.

Authors:  Robyn Newson; Lesley King; Lucie Rychetnik; Adrian E Bauman; Sally Redman; Andrew J Milat; Jacqueline Schroeder; Gillian Cohen; Simon Chapman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Predicting research use in a public health policy environment: results of a logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  Pauline Zardo; Alex Collie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  The Evaluation Scale: Exploring Decisions About Societal Impact in Peer Review Panels.

Authors:  Gemma E Derrick; Gabrielle N Samuel
Journal:  Minerva       Date:  2016-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.