Literature DB >> 2141338

Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility.

C M Kemp-Scholte1, C L Davidson.   

Abstract

The use of adhesive resin composites for restoration of Class V lesions often results in cervical marginal gap formation due to polymerization contraction. In this laboratory study, flexible linings applied between the bonding agent and the bulk restorative appeared to preserve the marginal integrity of Class V restorations during curing. Measurements of the polymerization contraction stress showed 20 to 50% relief due to various flexible intermediate materials. Apparently, reduction of the total stiffness by application of an intermediate layer can render the total restoration sufficiently flexible to compensate for that part of the stress that would otherwise exceed the bond strength.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2141338     DOI: 10.1177/00220345900690060301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  33 in total

1.  Marginal and internal adaptation of Class II ormocer and hybrid resin composite restorations before and after load cycling.

Authors:  N Kournetas; M Chakmakchi; A Kakaboura; C Rahiotis; J Geis-Gerstorfer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments. "Post-fatigue adaptation of indirect composite restorations".

Authors:  Giovanni Tommaso Rocca; Ladislav Gregor; Maria Jose Sandoval; Ivo Krejci; Didier Dietschi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  In vivo interfacial adaptation of class II resin composite restorations with and without a flowable resin composite liner.

Authors:  Anders Lindberg; J W V van Dijken; P Hörstedt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Residual stress in composites with the thin-ring-slitting approach.

Authors:  J W Park; J L Ferracane
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II CAD/CAM ceramic restorations with different resinous bases and interface treatments.

Authors:  María José Sandoval; Giovanni Tommaso Rocca; Ivo Krejci; Michael Mandikos; Didier Dietschi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Halloysite nanotube incorporation into adhesive systems—effect on bond strength to human dentin.

Authors:  Mohammed S Alkatheeri; Jadesada Palasuk; George J Eckert; Jeffrey A Platt; Marco C Bottino
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Effect of different placement techniques on marginal microleakage of deep class-II cavities restored with two composite resin formulations.

Authors:  Radhika M; Girija S Sajjan; Kumaraswamy B N; Neetu Mittal
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2010-01

8.  Shrinkage Stresses Generated during Resin-Composite Applications: A Review.

Authors:  Luis Felipe J Schneider; Larissa Maria Cavalcante; Nick Silikas
Journal:  J Dent Biomech       Date:  2009-09-30

9.  Novel rechargeable calcium phosphate dental nanocomposite.

Authors:  Ling Zhang; Michael D Weir; Laurence C Chow; Joseph M Antonucci; Jihua Chen; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Two-year clinical performance of a packable posterior composite with and without a flowable composite liner.

Authors:  Claus-Peter Ernst; Kerem Canbek; Kadir Aksogan; Brita Willershausen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.