Literature DB >> 21410531

Effects of traffic noise on occupancy patterns of forest birds.

Sarah E Goodwin1, W Gregory Shriver.   

Abstract

Noise may drive changes in the composition and abundance of animals that communicate vocally. Traffic produces low-frequency noise (<3 kHz) that can mask acoustic signals broadcast within the same frequency range. We evaluated whether birds that sing within the frequency range of traffic noise are affected by acoustic masking (i.e., increased background noise levels at the same frequency of vocalizations reduce detection of vocalization) and are less abundant in areas where traffic noise is loud (44-57 dB). We estimated occupancy, the expected probability that a given site is occupied by a species, and detection probabilities of eight forest-breeding birds in areas with and without traffic noise as a function of noise and three measures of habitat quality: percent forest cover, distance from plot center to the edge of forest, and the number of standing dead trees or snags. For the two species that vocalize at the lowest peak frequency (the frequency with the most energy) and the lowest overall frequency (Yellow-billed Cuckoo [Coccyzus americanus] and White-breasted Nuthatch [Sitta carolinensis]), the presence of traffic noise explained the greatest proportion of variance in occupancy, and these species were 10 times less likely to be found in noisy than in quiet plots. For species that had only portions of their vocalizations overlapped by traffic noise, either forest cover or distance to forest edge explained more variation in occupancy than noise or no single variable explained occupancy. Our results suggest that the effects of traffic noise may be especially pronounced for species that vocalize at low frequencies. ©2010 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21410531     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01602.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  14 in total

1.  Wildlife struggle in an increasingly noisy world.

Authors:  William F Laurance
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A phantom road experiment reveals traffic noise is an invisible source of habitat degradation.

Authors:  Heidi E Ware; Christopher J W McClure; Jay D Carlisle; Jesse R Barber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  An experimental investigation into the effects of traffic noise on distributions of birds: avoiding the phantom road.

Authors:  Christopher J W McClure; Heidi E Ware; Jay Carlisle; Gregory Kaltenecker; Jesse R Barber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Learning to cope: vocal adjustment to urban noise is correlated with prior experience in black-capped chickadees.

Authors:  Stefanie E LaZerte; Hans Slabbekoorn; Ken A Otter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Bird and invertebrate communities appear unaffected by fracking traffic along rural roads despite dust emissions.

Authors:  Jonathan Spiess; Devan Allen McGranahan; Craig Whippo; Brittany Poling; Aaron L M Daigh; Torre Hovick
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  Low-frequency songs lose their potency in noisy urban conditions.

Authors:  Wouter Halfwerk; Sander Bot; Jasper Buikx; Marco van der Velde; Jan Komdeur; Carel ten Cate; Hans Slabbekoorn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  On the relation between loudness and the increased song frequency of urban birds.

Authors:  Gonçalo C Cardoso; Jonathan W Atwell
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Noise pollution filters bird communities based on vocal frequency.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Interspecific comparison of traffic noise effects on dove coo transmission in urban environments.

Authors:  Bao-Sen Shieh; Shih-Hsiung Liang; Yuh-Wen Chiu; Szu-Ying Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A Bioacoustic Record of a Conservancy in the Mount Kenya Ecosystem.

Authors:  Ciira Wa Maina; David Muchiri; Peter Njoroge
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2016-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.