Literature DB >> 2140692

Survey of general practitioners' opinions on the role of radiology in patients with low back pain.

J P Owen1, G Rutt, M J Keir, H Spencer, D Richardson, A Richardson, C Barclay.   

Abstract

Ninety general practitioners responded to a questionnaire about the role of radiology in patients with low back pain. Their clinical indications for requesting radiographs were mostly in agreement with the opinions of radiologists, but nearly 80% requested investigations for their own or patients' reassurance. Understanding of the terms used by radiologists was good, although 25% thought that acute disc prolapse could be demonstrated on plain films. Previous training in radiology did not seem to influence knowledge. When general practitioners understood radiological terms they had clear therapeutic and specialist referral preferences. Poorly understood terms and those with which they were familiar but unclear about the implications for management were also identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2140692      PMCID: PMC1371073     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  12 in total

1.  Pain in the back: An attempt to estimate the size of the problem.

Authors:  R T Benn; P H Wood
Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil       Date:  1975-08

2.  Comparative roentgenographic study of the asymptomatic and symptomatic lumbar spine.

Authors:  W R Torgerson; W E Dotter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  X-ray utilization as a result of a patient care evaluation study.

Authors:  B Wolcott; C Tabatabai
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1980-07

4.  A comparative analysis of x-ray findings of the lumbar spine in patients with and without lumbar pain.

Authors:  I Witt; A Vestergaard; A Rosenklint
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Use of lumbar spine films. Statistical evaluation at a university teaching hospital.

Authors:  J G Scavone; R F Latshaw; G V Rohrer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-09-04       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The usefulness of x-ray examinations in the evaluation of patients with back pain.

Authors:  P H Rockey; R K Tompkins; R W Wood; B W Wolcott
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 0.493

7.  A reappraisal of the genetic consequences of diagnostic radiology in Great Britain.

Authors:  B F Wall; S Rae; S C Darby; G M Kendall
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  A prospective study of low back pain in a general population. II. Location, character, aggravating and relieving factors.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1983

9.  A prospective study of low back pain in a general population. III. Medical service--work consequence.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1983

10.  A prospective study of low back pain in a general population. I. Occurrence, recurrence and aetiology.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1983
View more
  14 in total

1.  General practitioners' views on radiology reports of plain radiography for back pain.

Authors:  Ansgar Espeland; Anders Baerheim
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  Ionizing radiation exposure--more good than harm? The preponderance of evidence does not support abandoning current standards and regulations.

Authors:  André E Bussières; Carlo Ammendolia; Cindy Peterson; John A M Taylor
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-06

3.  Attitudes to carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: a survey of health care professionals, relatives of sufferers and other members of the public.

Authors:  E K Watson; R Williamson; J Chapple
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Met or matched expectations: what accounts for a successful back pain consultation in primary care?

Authors:  Ehab E Georgy; Eloise C J Carr; Alan C Breen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Diagnostic Imaging Guidelines Implementation Study for Spinal Disorders: A Randomized Trial with Postal Follow-ups.

Authors:  André E Bussières; Louis Laurencelle; Cynthia Peterson
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2010

6.  Referral for x-ray.

Authors:  P Oakeshott; S Kerry; J Williams
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Are investigations anxiolytic or anxiogenic? A randomised controlled trial of neuroimaging to provide reassurance in chronic daily headache.

Authors:  L Howard; S Wessely; M Leese; L Page; P McCrone; K Husain; J Tong; A Dowson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Radiography of the lumbar spine in primary care patients with low back pain: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  D Kendrick; K Fielding; E Bentley; R Kerslake; P Miller; M Pringle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-17

9.  Radiography for low back pain: a randomised controlled trial and observational study in primary care.

Authors:  Sally Kerry; Sean Hilton; Derek Dundas; Elizabeth Rink; Pippa Oakeshott
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Implementation of RCGP guidelines for acute low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Paola Dey; Carl W R Simpson; Stuart I Collins; G Hodgson; Christopher F Dowrick; A J M Simison; M J Rose
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.