Literature DB >> 7265399

Use of lumbar spine films. Statistical evaluation at a university teaching hospital.

J G Scavone, R F Latshaw, G V Rohrer.   

Abstract

Use of lumbar spine films was evaluated in a retrospective review of 1,095 lumbar radiological examinations in 871 patients. Patients' histories and physical examination findings were correlated with four groups of radiological findings: (1) radiologically normal, (2) incidental findings unrelated to patients' complaints, (3) diagnostic films compatible with symptoms, and (4) radiological findings of questionable clinical significance. The high percentage of nondiagnostic and questionable results suggests overuse of lumbar spine films. Forty-six percent of all studies in this investigation were normal or had incidental findings, and an additional 31.8% had radiological findings of questionable clinical significance. Three hundred seventy-five follow-up examinations (64.2%) demonstrated no radiological interval changes. Radiation exposure and medical cost of noncontributory studies may be substantially reduced by judicious consideration of the potential diagnostic yield of the examination and by careful selection of repeated or follow-up studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7265399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  17 in total

Review 1.  [Differential diagnosis of back pain].

Authors:  W Reith; A Nabhan; J Kelm; N Naumann; F Ahlhelm
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Low back pain investigations and prognosis: a review.

Authors:  K M Refshauge; C G Maher
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Survey of general practitioners' opinions on the role of radiology in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  J P Owen; G Rutt; M J Keir; H Spencer; D Richardson; A Richardson; C Barclay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Plain film evaluation of degenerative disk disease at the lumbosacral junction.

Authors:  E L Cohn; E J Maurer; T E Keats; R G Dussault; P A Kaplan
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Early diagnostic evaluation of low back pain.

Authors:  R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Lumbar spine films in primary care: current use and effects of selective ordering criteria.

Authors:  R A Deyo; A K Diehl
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Frequency of radiographic procedures in an urban 62-year-old population in relation to general health, body build, bone mineral content, locomotor discomfort, occupational work load and socio-economic factors.

Authors:  H Bergenudd; B Nilsson; I Redlund-Johnell
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  The lack of prognostic value of computerized tomography imaging examinations in patients with chronic non-progressive back pain.

Authors:  O Elkayam; E Avrahami; M Yaron
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 9.  Low back pain.

Authors:  J B Reuler
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-08

10.  Long term effects of the introduction of noninvasive investigations in neuroradiology. Part 2: Effects on management of individual patients.

Authors:  I Moseley
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.