Literature DB >> 151124

The usefulness of x-ray examinations in the evaluation of patients with back pain.

P H Rockey, R K Tompkins, R W Wood, B W Wolcott.   

Abstract

Process and outcome data from 440 patients with back pain were analyzed. As a part of their care, 106 patients (24 percent) had back x-ray examinations. The non-x-rayed group of patients was used as a naturally occurring control group to determine what contribution back radiographs made to the cost, to the diagnoses and therapeutic decisions of providers, and to the outcome and satisfaction of patients. Although back x-rays contributed more to the cost of patient care than any other diagnostic study, their contribution to diagnosis was minimal, and had little effect on therapeutic decisions. Patients receiving back x-rays were more likely to have had prolonged symptoms at their first visit, and less likely to be symptom-free at four weeks, but were more likely to be satisfied with their care. The authors conclude that, for patients under 50, back x-ray examinations have negligible diagnostic value and their use could be reduced without decreasing the quality of medical care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 151124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  10 in total

1.  The Overutilization of X-rays.

Authors:  W K Lyon
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Diagnostic testing in family practice.

Authors:  R V Birtwhistle
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Survey of general practitioners' opinions on the role of radiology in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  J P Owen; G Rutt; M J Keir; H Spencer; D Richardson; A Richardson; C Barclay
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Cancer as a cause of back pain: frequency, clinical presentation, and diagnostic strategies.

Authors:  R A Deyo; A K Diehl
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Lumbar spine films in primary care: current use and effects of selective ordering criteria.

Authors:  R A Deyo; A K Diehl
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Phased trial of a proven algorithm at a new primary care clinic.

Authors:  J J Christensen-Szalanski; P H Diehr; R W Wood; R K Tompkins
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Radiography of the lumbar spine in primary care patients with low back pain: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  D Kendrick; K Fielding; E Bentley; R Kerslake; P Miller; M Pringle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-17

Review 8.  Low back pain.

Authors:  J B Reuler
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-08

9.  Persistent pain and the injured worker: Integrating biomedical, psychosocial, and behavioral factors in assessment.

Authors:  D C Turk; T E Rudy
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1991-06

10.  Radiophobia: 7 Reasons Why Radiography Used in Spine and Posture Rehabilitation Should Not Be Feared or Avoided.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Deed E Harrison
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.658

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.