Literature DB >> 21402967

Papanicolaou tests: does lubricant reduce the quality or adequacy?

G Michael Allan1, Christina Korownyk, Noah Ivers.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21402967      PMCID： PMC3056679     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Fam Physician        ISSN： 0008-350X            Impact factor:   3.275


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  The effect of vaginal speculum lubrication on the rate of unsatisfactory cervical cytology diagnosis.

Authors:  Anne-Marie E Amies; Leslie Miller; Shu-Kuang Lee; Laura Koutsky
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Is liquid-based pap testing affected by water-based lubricant?

Authors:  Jon K Hathaway; Pramod K Pathak; Rhonda Maney
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Vaginal speculum lubrication and its effects on cervical cytology and microbiology.

Authors:  William F Griffith; Gretchen S Stuart; Karen L Gluck; Stephen F Heartwell
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  The effect of lubricant contamination on ThinPrep (Cytyc) cervical cytology liquid-based preparations.

Authors:  T Holton; D Smith; M Terry; A Madgwick; T Levine
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 2.073

5.  Does gel affect cytology or comfort in the screening papanicolaou smear?

Authors:  Meredith Gilson; Alpa Desai; Gabriella Cardoza-Favarato; Penny Vroman; Jennifer A Thornton
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.657

6.  Efficacy of patient letter reminders on cervical cancer screening: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  D S Tseng; E Cox; M B Plane; K M Hla
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  General practitioner attitudes to recall systems for cervical screening.

Authors:  J J Beilby; M A Wakefield; A M Maddock
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1995-09-04       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Too much of a good thing? Physician practices and patient willingness for less frequent pap test screening intervals.

Authors:  Helen I Meissner; Jasmin A Tiro; K Robin Yabroff; David A Haggstrom; Steven S Coughlin
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Lubrication of the vaginal introitus and speculum does not affect Papanicolaou smears.

Authors:  W Benson Harer; Guillermo Valenzuela; Debra Lebo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Acceptability of reminder letters for Papanicolaou tests: a survey of women from 23 Family Health Networks in Ontario.

Authors:  Tina Karwalajtys; Janusz Kaczorowski; Lynne Lohfeld; Stephanie Laryea; Kelly Anderson; Stefanie Roder; Rolf J Sebaldt
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2007-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.