Literature DB >> 18093222

The effect of lubricant contamination on ThinPrep (Cytyc) cervical cytology liquid-based preparations.

T Holton1, D Smith, M Terry, A Madgwick, T Levine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent of lubricant use by smear-takers and the effect of lubricant contamination of ThinPrep processed cervical cytology samples.
METHODS: All primary care smear-takers were sent a questionnaire on lubricant type and frequency of use. Fifty cervical cytology samples were then contaminated with incremental amounts of K-Y jelly, 50 samples contaminated with incremental amounts of Aquagel and ten non-contaminated vials were processed using the ThinPrep T2000 processor followed by Papanicolaou staining. The morphological appearances of lubricant contamination were described microscopically and formal cell counts performed on all slides.
RESULTS: Seventy of 94 (74.5%) primary care smear-takers indicated lubricant use of whom 9/70 (12.8%) used Aquagel and 61/70 (87.2%) used K-Y jelly. K-Y jelly appeared as mucoid blue deposits in the slide background whereas Aquagel appeared as pink stringy background material. Cell counting showed a significant difference between Aquagel and K-Y jelly contaminated slides compared to the original non-contaminated preparations for all fields and the average fields (P < 0.001) with a significantly higher count for the original non-contaminated slides than the lubricant contaminated groups.
CONCLUSION: Lubricant contamination of ThinPrep cervical cytology samples may result in reduced cellularity of the subsequent slide. This study provides evidence-based data to support British Society for Clinical Cytology recommendations for no lubricant use when taking cervical samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18093222     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2007.00525.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytopathology        ISSN: 0956-5507            Impact factor:   2.073


  4 in total

1.  Papanicolaou tests: does lubricant reduce the quality or adequacy?

Authors:  G Michael Allan; Christina Korownyk; Noah Ivers
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Comparison of 2 anal cytology protocols to predict high-grade anal intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Dorothy JoAnn Wiley; Hilary Hsu; Robert Bolan; Alen Voskanian; David Elashoff; Stephen Young; Ruvy Dayrit; Provaboti Barman; Katherine DeAzambuja; Emmanuel V Masongsong; Otoniel Martínez-Maza; Roger Detels
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Test performance and acceptability of self- versus provider-collected swabs for high-risk HPV DNA testing in female-to-male trans masculine patients.

Authors:  Sari L Reisner; Madeline B Deutsch; Sarah M Peitzmeier; Jaclyn M White Hughto; Timothy P Cavanaugh; Dana J Pardee; Sarah A McLean; Lori A Panther; Marcy Gelman; Matthew J Mimiaga; Jennifer E Potter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Etiologic factors related to unsatisfactory ThinPrep(®) cervical cytology: Evaluation and potential solutions to improve.

Authors:  Tatyana Kalinicheva; Nora Frisch; Tamar Giorgadze; Shashi Madan; Anushree Shidham; Amarpreet Bhalla; Linette Mejias-Badillo; Paul Tranchida; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Inderpreet Dhillon; Vinod B Shidham
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.091

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.