Literature DB >> 14995922

Danish obstetricians' personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey.

Thomas Bergholt1, Birgitte Østberg, Jesper Legarth, Tom Weber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess Danish obstetricians' and gynecologists' personal preference and general attitude towards elective cesarean section on maternal request in uncomplicated single cephalic pregnancies at term.
DESIGN: Nation-wide anonymous postal questionnaire. POPULATION: Four hundred and fifty-five obstetricians and gynecologists identified in the records of the Danish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology from January 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Personal preference on the mode of delivery and general attitude towards elective cesarean section on maternal request in an uncomplicated single cephalic pregnancies at term.
RESULTS: Of Danish specialists in obstetrics and gynecology, 1.1% would prefer an elective cesarean section in an uncomplicated pregnancy at 37 weeks of gestation with fetal weight estimation of 3.0 kg. This rose to 22.5% when the fetal weight estimation was 4.5 kg at 37 weeks. The main reasons given for preferring abdominal deliveries was the risk to the fetus, risks of perineal injury, and urinary and anal incontinence. Of Danish specialists in obstetrics and gynecology, 37.6% agreed with a woman's right to have an elective cesarean section on maternal request without any medical indication. Obstetricians and gynecologists who had experienced a noninstrumental vaginal delivery themselves or practiced as a private gynecologist only, were less likely to agree with the woman's right to elective cesarean section on maternal request.
CONCLUSION: The vast majority of Danish obstetricians and gynecologists would personally prefer vaginal delivery in uncomplicated pregnancies, but nearly 40% agree with the woman's right to request a cesarean section.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14995922     DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.0312.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  14 in total

1.  Do caesarean section rates 'catch-up'? Evidence from 14 European countries.

Authors:  Wen-Yi Chen
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2013-03-22

2.  Patterns of deliveries in a Brazilian birth cohort: almost universal cesarean sections for the better-off.

Authors:  Aluísio J D Barros; Iná S Santos; Alicia Matijasevich; Marlos Rodrigues Domingues; Mariângela Silveira; Fernando C Barros; Cesar G Victora
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.106

3.  Cesarean delivery on maternal request: a western North Carolina perspective.

Authors:  Stephanie T Romero; Carol C Coulson; Shelley L Galvin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-04

4.  Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Kirkeby Hansen; Kirsten Wisborg; Niels Uldbjerg; Tine Brink Henriksen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-12-11

5.  Obstetrical providers' preferred mode of delivery and attitude towards non-medically indicated caesarean sections: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  J C Rivo; M Amyx; V Pingray; R A Casale; A E Fiorillo; H B Krupitzki; J D Malamud; M Mendilaharzu; M L Medina; A B Del Pino; L Ribola; J A Schvartzman; G M Tartalo; M Trasmonte; S Varela; F Althabe; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 6.531

6.  Birth outcomes following cesarean delivery on maternal request: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Yanfang Guo; Malia S Q Murphy; Erica Erwin; Romina Fakhraei; Daniel J Corsi; Ruth Rennicks White; Alysha L J Harvey; Laura M Gaudet; Mark C Walker; Shi Wu Wen; Darine El-Chaâr
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Medical students' personal choice for mode of delivery in Santa Catarina, Brazil: a cross-sectional, quantitative study.

Authors:  Tatiane Watanabe; Roxana Knobel; Guilherme Suchard; Mario Julio Franco; Eleonora d'Orsi; Elenice Bertanha Consonni; Marcos Consonni
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Prelabour caesarean section following IVF/ICSI in older-term nulliparous women: too precious to push?

Authors:  E Gillet; E Martens; G Martens; H Cammu
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2011-11-03

9.  Obstetricians' Opinions of the Optimal Caesarean Rate: A Global Survey.

Authors:  Francesca L Cavallaro; Jenny A Cresswell; Carine Ronsmans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Personal Preference of Mode of Delivery. What do Urogynaecologists choose? Preliminary Results of the DECISION Study.

Authors:  Julia Bihler; Ralf Tunn; Christl Reisenauer; Jan Pauluschke-Fröhlich; Philipp Wagner; Harald Abele; Katharina K Rall; Gert Naumann; Markus Wallwiener; Sara Y Brucker; Markus Hübner
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.