Literature DB >> 18199421

Patients' attitudes associated with cesarean delivery on maternal request in an urban population.

Leo Pevzner1, Dena Goffman, Margaret Comerford Freda, Ashlesha K Dayal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore patient attitudes related to cesarean delivery on maternal request (CDMR). STUDY
DESIGN: Questionnaires were distributed to patients in mid-trimester. Questions assessed patient demographics, knowledge, perceived risks, and attitudes about CDMR.
RESULTS: Three hundred and fourteen questionnaires and 188 written responses were used for analysis. Most patients (95%) did not believe that CDMR was advisable and felt that vaginal delivery (VD) was safer for both mother (93%) and baby (88%). Of patients who did not believe CDMR was advisable, the most common explanations were classified into categories of "normal is better," "risk of complications" (67%), only 1% of this group felt that the decision should be left up to the individual. Of the remaining patients (5%) who supported CDMR, 75% believed that the decision should be left up to the individual.
CONCLUSION: The majority of women in our population do not think that CDMR is advisable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18199421     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  6 in total

1.  Cesarean delivery on maternal request: a western North Carolina perspective.

Authors:  Stephanie T Romero; Carol C Coulson; Shelley L Galvin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2012-04

Review 2.  Women's preference for caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  A Mazzoni; F Althabe; N H Liu; A M Bonotti; L Gibbons; A J Sánchez; J M Belizán
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 7.331

3.  Investigation of factors affecting the tendency to choose the type of delivery in pregnant women referring to hospitals of Ardabil Province in 2016.

Authors:  Vahid Izadi; Vahid Zamanzadeh; Mehri Seyedjavadi; Rahele Mohammadi; Effat Mazaheri
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr

4.  How is women's demand for caesarean section measured? A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Clémence Schantz; Myriam de Loenzien; Sophie Goyet; Marion Ravit; Aurélien Dancoisne; Alexandre Dumont
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders.

Authors:  Alice Yuen Loke; Louise Davies; Yim-Wah Mak
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The preference of Iranian women to have normal vaginal or cesarean deliveries.

Authors:  Najmeh Maharlouei; Abbas Rezaianzadeh; Elham Hesami; Fariba Moradi; Ezat Mazloomi; Hassan Joulaei; Mohammad Khodayari; Kamran B Lankarani
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.852

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.